I quickly found the thread. Also from the same date:Blackvegetable » 14 Feb 2023, 10:58 am » wrote: ↑ Which weapon does that refer to?
Do you question that the words are mine?
I don't see your answer, keystroke too far.Huey » 14 Feb 2023, 11:00 am » wrote: ↑ I quickly found the thread. Also from the same date:
Well, since the weapons you are discussing are not designed for military use they are semi automatic sports rifles.
To which weapon does the snippet in your sig refer?Huey » 14 Feb 2023, 11:00 am » wrote: ↑ I quickly found the thread. Also from the same date:
Well, since the weapons you are discussing are not designed for military use they are semi automatic sports rifles.
Already posted on this thread. Pointed it out and everything.
Blackvegetable » 14 Feb 2023, 11:21 am » wrote: ↑ To which weapon does the snippet in your sig refer?
The 643rd time.
Run on, buzzy...Huey » 14 Feb 2023, 11:22 am » wrote: ↑ You really don't know? And you have been trying to use the source for months.
”have changed the weapon in basic design…”Huey » 14 Feb 2023, 11:25 am » wrote: ↑ I am not running. What you are asking has been discussed at least 642 times and has been posted to this thread.
The two weapons in question are the M 16 and the Colt Sporter. One designed for the battlefield and one designed for civilian use.
”have changed the weapon in basic design…”
Blackvegetable » 14 Feb 2023, 11:31 am » wrote: ↑”have changed the weapon in basic design…”Huey » 14 Feb 2023, 11:25 am » wrote: ↑ I am not running. What you are asking has been discussed at least 642 times and has been posted to this thread.
The two weapons in question are the M 16 and the Colt Sporter. One designed for the battlefield and one designed for civilian use.
”have changed the weapon in basic design…”
Exactly...
What weapon was "changed"?
869th time.
Blackvegetable » 14 Feb 2023, 11:31 am » wrote: ↑”have changed the weapon in basic design…”Huey » 14 Feb 2023, 11:25 am » wrote: ↑ I am not running. What you are asking has been discussed at least 642 times and has been posted to this thread.
The two weapons in question are the M 16 and the Colt Sporter. One designed for the battlefield and one designed for civilian use.
”have changed the weapon in basic design…”
Exactly...
What weapon was "changed"?
869th time.
Huey » 14 Feb 2023, 11:33 am » wrote: ↑Blackvegetable » 14 Feb 2023, 11:31 am » wrote: ↑”have changed the weapon in basic design…”Huey » 14 Feb 2023, 11:25 am » wrote: ↑ I am not running. What you are asking has been discussed at least 642 times and has been posted to this thread.
The two weapons in question are the M 16 and the Colt Sporter. One designed for the battlefield and one designed for civilian use.
”have changed the weapon in basic design…”
Exactly...
What weapon was "changed"?
869th time.
You know what basic designed was changed. I have posted the many design changes multiple times. Go on record with your stance. Go ahead and say the M 16 and the Colt Sporter are the same weapon. I know you want to......
GO for it...Blackvegetable » 14 Feb 2023, 11:33 am » wrote: ↑To what weapon does the snippet in your sig refer?Huey » 14 Feb 2023, 11:31 am » wrote: ↑ Another? You only get to say that when you finally achieve that goal for the first time.
1145th time.
Answer the question.
Blackvegetable » 14 Feb 2023, 11:35 am » wrote: ↑ Answer the question.
You insist you have..
3 keystrokes..
Can you acknowledge it?Huey » 14 Feb 2023, 11:33 am » wrote: ↑ You know what basic designed was changed. I have posted the many design changes multiple times. Go on record with your stance. Go ahead and say the M 16 and the Colt Sporter are the same weapon. I know you want to......
Not one time..Huey » 14 Feb 2023, 11:35 am » wrote: ↑ You know the answer. Given 1475 times. Still waiting on your case.
Blackvegetable » 14 Feb 2023, 11:36 am » wrote: ↑Can you acknowledge it?Huey » 14 Feb 2023, 11:33 am » wrote: ↑ You know what basic designed was changed. I have posted the many design changes multiple times. Go on record with your stance. Go ahead and say the M 16 and the Colt Sporter are the same weapon. I know you want to......
Why not?
You are running from your own sig.Huey » 14 Feb 2023, 11:42 am » wrote: ↑ Yup, not ONE time. 1572 times.
I can't take an L for an argument you never made.
Huey » 14 Feb 2023, 11:41 am » wrote: ↑ I have acknowledged it 1522 times. The better question is why you can't articulate your argument. I mean ****, dude, you misquoted an article about the Sporter being designed for civilians and you still have to ask.
If I haven't why are you melting down, while running?The better question is why you can't articulate your argument.
Nope. You have quoted the same source from the same article. You know what weapon it refers to. State you case. The M 16 and the Sporter are two very different weapons with two very different purposes.Blackvegetable » 14 Feb 2023, 11:44 am » wrote: ↑ You are running from your own sig.
Only you, Sheilagh.
I am right here. State your case.Blackvegetable » 14 Feb 2023, 11:45 am » wrote: ↑ If I haven't why are you melting down, while running?
Must I post ANOTHER example?