Blackvegetable » 14 Feb 2023, 1:29 pm » wrote: ↑ It doesn't answer the question.
Acknowledge that you've been answered.
Now answer.
Post the question.Huey » 14 Feb 2023, 1:30 pm » wrote: ↑ Already have. Take your L. One designed for combat the other for civilians.
Run.Huey » 14 Feb 2023, 1:44 pm » wrote: ↑ No need. One was designed for combat and the other for civilians.
Sheilagh,Huey » 14 Feb 2023, 1:46 pm » wrote: ↑ Waiting....
One was designed for combat and the other for civilians.
Which one are you arguing about?
Tiny,Huey » 14 Feb 2023, 3:43 pm » wrote: ↑ You haven't done anything but avoid making a case. I'm good with the win.
You lose. You have posted from my source. You now what it is. Why do you lie?Blackvegetable » 14 Feb 2023, 4:44 pm » wrote: ↑ Tiny,
Running from your sig, crying "Is too!" is losing....even among little girls...
White flag.
Waiting....Blackvegetable » 14 Feb 2023, 4:44 pm » wrote: ↑ Tiny,
Running from your sig, crying "Is too!" is losing....even among little girls...
White flag.
One was designed for the battlefield field, the other the same weapon simply MODIFIED "so as to not be a machine gun".Huey » 14 Feb 2023, 6:43 pm » wrote: ↑ Waiting....
One was designed for combat and the other for civilians.
Which one are you arguing about?
I've said I know what other is, ****.Huey » 14 Feb 2023, 6:43 pm » wrote: ↑ You lose. You have posted from my source. You now what it is. Why do you lie?
Waiting....
One was designed for combat and the other for civilians.
Which one are you arguing about?
Keep running…
Post what they are. My argument is made. Yours isnt.Blackvegetable » 14 Feb 2023, 7:03 pm » wrote: ↑ I've said I know what other is, ****.
Now you acknowledge it.
Geebus.
One was designed for combat and the other for civilians.Blackvegetable » 14 Feb 2023, 6:56 pm » wrote: ↑ One was designed for the battlefield field, the other the same weapon simply MODIFIED "so as to not be a machine gun".
According to your citation.
That's 100% Verbul, hence entirely irrelevant.
No, it isn't..
Nope, that is the crux of the matter, as the sources point out. Still waiting for you to post your firearm knowledge concerning the discussion I have won.
It isn't "crux"Huey » 15 Feb 2023, 10:58 am » wrote: ↑ Nope, that is the crux of the matter, as the sources point out. Still waiting for you to post your firearm knowledge concerning the discussion I have won.