I don't give a monkey **** about your relationship with AARP, stooge.slideman » 11 Feb 2023, 6:32 pm » wrote: ↑ You're really not too bright you attribute a lot of things to me that have nothing to do with me at all. Stupid
I have been an adversary to Big pharma for decades. I refuse to join AARP because they failed to support the right of the government to negotiate Medicare drug prices with pharma.
Real stuff in the real world idiot boy
But it is you who want to dictate to employers what the conditions of employment should be who is the **** Nazi?Cannonpointer » 11 Feb 2023, 6:34 pm » wrote: ↑ I don't give a monkey **** about your relationship with AARP, stooge.
You are a vax nazi. And you support vax nazis. So you are NOT pro-choice, fruity. I am.
Nice talking points.slideman » 11 Feb 2023, 6:38 pm » wrote: ↑ But it is you who want to dictate to employers what the conditions of employment should be who is the **** Nazi?
You don't think employers should have the right to hire whoever they want?
They're going to be dictated to by you?
As a capitalist and an entrepreneur let me say: **** off
If that happened I am unaware of it please point me to documentation.Cannonpointer » 11 Feb 2023, 6:41 pm » wrote: ↑ Nice talking points.
When the emloyer is being FINED for the employees being unvaxed, PHARMA STOOGE, it isn't them who is dictating. It is your nanny state, "capitalist entrepreneur" parrot.
Riiight. You were under the impression that employers just suddenly and spontaneously all issued the same demand.slideman » 11 Feb 2023, 6:43 pm » wrote: ↑ If that happened I am unaware of it please point me to documentation.
Perhaps they all fell in line, fruitcake. They were still threatened, and still repsonded to the threat by issuing threats to their employees, fruity.slideman » 11 Feb 2023, 6:45 pm » wrote: ↑ Okay I looked it up and it turns out no employer has been fined.
Keep weaseling, pharma stooge. You wag your tongue about AARP not being pure enough. I gave you links that quote biden promising those fines - not the "right wing," liar.slideman » 11 Feb 2023, 6:45 pm » wrote: ↑ The right wing claims there is a provision in a bill concerning hazards in the workplace that could lead to employers being fined around the vax it is a long stretch of the imagination.
Try again
Looks like BYRON DONALD just OWNED the entire Twitter uppity ups!! MASSIVE bitch slap!!Cannonpointer » 11 Feb 2023, 5:03 pm » wrote: ↑ Just shut your dishonest dick hole, ***.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kvC4z8QD_ag
Provisions in your boy bye-DONE'S MANDATE, doofus!! You need to get out more and get into REAL news instead of your propagandists CNNaganda and LSDNBC. Not to mention the NY Slimes and the Washington Compost.slideman » 11 Feb 2023, 6:45 pm » wrote: ↑ Okay I looked it up and it turns out no employer has been fined. The right wing claims there is a provision in a bill concerning hazards in the workplace that could lead to employers being fined around the vax it is a long stretch of the imagination.
Try again
It's not a bill, stooge. It's an E.O.slideman » 11 Feb 2023, 6:45 pm » wrote: ↑ Okay I looked it up and it turns out no employer has been fined. The right wing claims there is a provision in a bill concerning hazards in the workplace that could lead to employers being fined around the vax it is a long stretch of the imagination.
Try again
Hey, that's not true. It's the right wing. Don't you believe in capitlaism? I'm an entrepreneur. The border is secure. That's q-anon.Z09 » 11 Feb 2023, 7:04 pm » wrote: ↑ Tell us...
Why under Biden you can get FIRED for not getting the vaccine...
But at the same time Biden is allowing millions of illegals in the country and they DON'T have to be vaxed?
Just wondering
It's NOT US who is trying to tell employers WHO TO HIRE or regulate conditions of employment, slippy, that would be YOUR NASTY BUNCH!!slideman » 11 Feb 2023, 6:38 pm » wrote: ↑ But it is you who want to dictate to employers what the conditions of employment should be who is the **** Nazi?
You don't think employers should have the right to hire whoever they want?
They're going to be dictated to by you?
As a capitalist and an entrepreneur let me say: **** off
Whistleblowers are protected, *******.slideman » 09 Feb 2023, 8:54 pm » wrote: ↑ The Pederast facilitator promised a dozen whistleblowers would be presented by the distort government actions committee.
No whistleblower so far just a bunch of irrelevant people like turley and Tulsi.
Whence the whistleblowers Gym?
He's a lightweight sac of ****.Beekeeper » 11 Feb 2023, 7:11 pm » wrote: ↑ It's NOT US who is trying to tell employers WHO TO HIRE or regulate conditions of employment, slippy, that would be YOUR NASTY BUNCH!!
You know, like FORCING UNIONS on employers and FORCING MANDATES on employers regarding RACE and GENDER!! Do you REALLY think you can PROVE YOUR STATEMENT?? Then DO IT!
Oh, look. Homophobic insults.
Something a creaker like you could understand.
More like sophomoric from a child who just had his lunch money taken and his butt kicked.
^^^^confuses the term 'libertarian' for 'trump cacksucker' [and monetary ignoramus]RedheadedStranger » 09 Feb 2023, 8:59 pm » wrote: ↑ They've only been at it for a month.
You sound like Misty yesterday squawking about how the Republican led House hasn't fixed the Country yet.
Damn, it's only February of the first year of the 118th Congress.