Liberal Forum

Xavier_Onassis » 10 Feb 2023, 12:48 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Feb 2023, 12:48 pm

Most of what is on Wiki is more accurate that what you peckerwoods listen to on Fox, like the Perpetually Outraged Figplucker.

colleges are not even allowed to use wiki... that says a lot right there asswipe

sunburn » 10 Feb 2023, 12:50 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Feb 2023, 12:50 pm

ok, laugh:Whistleblower timeline: Team Trump contacts and …https://www.cnn.com/2019/09/20/politics...WebSep 20, 2019 · The growing controversy stems from a whistleblower complaint that deals, at least in part, with a phone call Trump had with …

  Is CNN better for baby?

CNN???????????????? wow keep reaching you uneducated ghetto monkey

FJB » 10 Feb 2023, 12:51 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Feb 2023, 12:51 pm

CNN???????????????? wow keep reaching you uneducated ghetto monkey

you are a complete imbicile!
you don't even realize I'm shooting holes in Trumprules statement he didn't remember the Democrats saying they had a whistleblower.

you gut react to anything posted about Trump without even digesting the context.
You have TDS about as bad as liberals.

slideman » 10 Feb 2023, 10:35 am » wrote: ↑

10 Feb 2023, 10:35 am

But gym said he was going to produce the whistleblowers to testify before the committee.

"Goldman, in a tense exchange with Jordan, grilled the Republican on his claims and asked why information ― and testimony ― from the whistleblowers hadn’t been made available to Democrats on the committee.  Jordan, in response, said information from the whistleblowers would be available to Democrats “when they testify,” but Goldman wasn’t having it."

https://sports.yahoo.com/freshman-democ ... 52102.html

Gee, it was GOOD ENOUGH FOR HIM when your boy Schiffy said he didn't need to produce "no stinkin' witnesses".

So NOW you are changing your tune back to the DOUBLE STANDARD all you moronic tards have?? This is why you LWNJ's need to be put in front of a firing squad inside 2 minutes when you start this crap when you play that "gotcha" ****!!

Beekeeper » 10 Feb 2023, 1:16 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Feb 2023, 1:16 pm

Gee, it was GOOD ENOUGH FOR HIM when your boy Schiffy said he didn't need to produce "no stinkin' witnesses".

So NOW you are changing your tune back to the DOUBLE STANDARD all you moronic tards have?? This is why you LWNJ's need to be put in front of a firing squad inside 2 minutes when you start this crap when you play that "gotcha" ****!!

Be sure to foam at the mouth while you spew your nonsense. You lost the argument so you want to put me in front of a firing squad. Typical right wing nut job

What schiff did is beside the point anyway.
Gym Jordan has repeatedly averred that he would produce whistleblowers to testify.

Go wash your face

Trumprules » 10 Feb 2023, 1:20 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Feb 2023, 1:20 pm

Sorry I'm an honest old time republican and can't let you get away with this spin and lies. 

Our republican lawmakers blocked any wirltnesses. Please quit lying when it can be easily proven wrong it make us look bad.

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/31/us/p ... trial.html

You have issues with COMPREHENSION in that these are LEGISLATIVE HEARINGS to craft legislation to prevent the LOSS OF FREEDOM OF SPEECH and NOT partisan hearings to try to remove a PRESIDENT from office as somehow being one in the same.

You ALSO seem to forget that DEMOCRATS tried to block witnesses in the CLINTON impeachment Senate trial as well. Need help finding it?

Oh, and your current President ALSO didn't want witnesses either.....

Biden circulated the four-page document, titled “Arguments in Support of a Summary Impeachment Trial,” on Jan. 5, 1999. In his memo, obtained by POLITICO, Biden cited historical precedents from impeachment cases going back to the establishment of the Senate and asserted “The Senate need not hold a ‘full-blown’ trial.

“The Senate may dismiss articles of impeachment without holding a full trial or taking new evidence. Put another way, the Constitution does not impose on the Senate the duty to hold a trial,” Biden wrote at the time.

https://www.politico.com/news/2020/01/3 ... ess-109730 
 

slideman » 10 Feb 2023, 1:20 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Feb 2023, 1:20 pm

Be sure to foam at the mouth while you spew your nonsense. You lost the argument so you want to put me in front of a firing squad. Typical right wing nut job

I lost nothing, dipweed!!

It is YOUR SIDE that is losing in these hearings as your POWER TO CONTROL SPEECH AND ALL OTHER RIGHTS are slipping away in baskets filled with FACTS AND TESTIMONY!!!

You'll get your whistleblowers testimony and when you DO, you will rue the day you opened your big fact cock holster for the world to view!!

Trumprules » 10 Feb 2023, 1:30 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Feb 2023, 1:30 pm

The Republicans blocked wirltnesses you can't claim the democrats had no witnesses when you blocked them.

ARE YOU STUPID???

DEMOCRATS TRIED THAT SAME CRAP IN CLINTON'S IMPEACHMENT YOU F'ing DOLT!!

Damn, you are as bad a BV!! Maybe worse.

Beekeeper » 10 Feb 2023, 1:31 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Feb 2023, 1:31 pm

I lost nothing, dipweed!!

It is YOUR SIDE that is losing in these hearings as your POWER TO CONTROL SPEECH AND ALL OTHER RIGHTS are slipping away in baskets filled with FACTS AND TESTIMONY!!!

You'll get your whistleblowers testimony and when you DO, you will rue the day you opened your big fact cock holster for the world to view!!

You live in an interesting alternative reality

We've already established with your desire to put me in front of a firing squad that you are completely unhinged

Get some help

LoL! NOW the dicksucking dims demand whistleblowers to be exposed for retaliation.      


Where were these dicksucking dims when President Trump was being persecuted by anonymous whistleblowers?



 

Trumprules » 10 Feb 2023, 1:13 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Feb 2023, 1:13 pm

So when did the democrats have whistle blowers when they did not. I don't remember but that's OK. If you would hit me up with that link so I can educate myself. I don't know everything and never claimed to.

another mister obtuse.  during the Trump trial about the Ukrainian call; they never produced the whistleblower they said they got info from.

slideman » 10 Feb 2023, 1:34 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Feb 2023, 1:34 pm

You live in an interesting alternative reality

We've already established with your desire to put me in front of a firing squad that you are completely unhinged

Get some help

I'm not the one supporting the FASCIST Democrat NAZIS in Congress, that would be YOU, Mr. "Mueller will present his report, Trump will resign"!!
 

Trumprules » 10 Feb 2023, 10:53 am » wrote: ↑

10 Feb 2023, 10:53 am

I don't remember the democrats claiming to yave any. But I digress.

Your memory and my dick are about the same length......don't tell your wife, I'd rather not hear from either of you.

Xavier_Onassis » 10 Feb 2023, 10:50 am » wrote: ↑

10 Feb 2023, 10:50 am

This is accurate.

WORNG AGAIN, perfessor!!

You seem to forget we have ACTUAL EMAILS AND TEXTS from these same TWITTER EXECS that totally CONTRADICTS their testimony and  that the FBI and other Alphabet agencies had an OPEN LINE to them to CENSOR TWEETS OF CONSERVATIVES!!

And all of that will be used as EVIDENCE to convict them of PERJURY FOR LYING TO CONGRESS!!

Sucks for you, huh Bozoi??
 

Beekeeper » 10 Feb 2023, 5:22 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Feb 2023, 5:22 pm

WORNG AGAIN, perfessor!!

You seem to forget we have ACTUAL EMAILS AND TEXTS from these same TWITTER EXECS that totally CONTRADICTS their testimony and  that the FBI and other Alphabet agencies had an OPEN LINE to them to CENSOR TWEETS OF CONSERVATIVES!!

And all of that will be used as EVIDENCE to convict them of PERJURY FOR LYING TO CONGRESS!!

Sucks for you, huh Bozoi??
 

You do not have diddly-****, imbecile.

 

Beekeeper » 10 Feb 2023, 6:54 am » wrote: ↑

10 Feb 2023, 6:54 am

PSsst. Wingbreath.

The whistleblower REPORTS are all you need. They are SWORN affidavits that hold 100% clout as EVIDENCE in any trial you WILL SEE!!

Run along now before you get spanked over and over and over!!

"Mueller will preset his report. Trump will resign" worked out for you real good, huh??

Does that hold for the testimony before the Jan 6th Commission?

Trumprules » 10 Feb 2023, 5:33 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Feb 2023, 5:33 pm

It's quite interesting that they seem to show no proof of what they say and we are to believe them. When I clearly shown proof.

Did Gym SAY he had whistle-blowers?

Why is that not good enough?


Oh...yea....that.....


Never mind.



 

Xavier_Onassis » 10 Feb 2023, 10:39 am » wrote: ↑

10 Feb 2023, 10:39 am

He has no whistleblowers, perhaps.
Those he thought were whistleblowers turned out to have no whistles, only kazoos vuvuzelas, and squeakers they took out of their doggy's toys.

What is a vuvuzelas? Or you meant 'vulvazelas", something Buck Naked would be very interested in?
     

An opinion piece in today's LA times

"It was obvious from these first two attempts at oversight that House Republicans have absolutely nothing. Their strained efforts to prove there is a “there” there are backfiring spectacularly and raising serious questions about the basic competence of Jordan and Comer."

https://www.latimes.com/opinion/story/2 ... n-mccarthy