Have I not made clear I don’t care what you are looking for? I have I made clear the question has been answered in the past?Blackvegetable » 11 Feb 2023, 1:40 pm » wrote: ↑ Did I make clear I was looking for ONE number, 2Stand......or did I anticipate what you would claim to be this "answer" of yours?
Or both?
Why do you feel the need to ask the same questions over and over and over again?Blackvegetable » 11 Feb 2023, 1:40 pm » wrote: ↑ Did I make clear I was looking for ONE number, 2Stand......or did I anticipate what you would claim to be this "answer" of yours?
Or both?
He is.RedheadedStranger » 11 Feb 2023, 1:43 pm » wrote: ↑ Why do you feel the need to ask the same questions over and over and over again?
Are you that forgetful ?
Maybe you should see a neurologist.
I've already told you.RedheadedStranger » 11 Feb 2023, 1:43 pm » wrote: ↑ Why do you feel the need to ask the same questions over and over and over again?
Are you that forgetful ?
Maybe you should see a neurologist.
And can’t remember the answer to the same question he has asked numerous times,
Is it that far beyond your grasp of understanding that precisely how WE define a woman IS NOT THE ISSUE?
You found the answer to the question you have already had answered?Blackvegetable » 11 Feb 2023, 1:50 pm » wrote: ↑ I've already told you.
You just saw a perfect example.
Huey » 11 Feb 2023, 2:46 pm » wrote: ↑ You found the answer to the question you have already had answered?
I will say it is more than two. I will also say at the moment I have what I think I need. A different weapon for different types of shooting.
Just curious…you adding this to your massive database?
We all notice that you can't do it, little girl.
Zeet,Zeets2 » 11 Feb 2023, 2:06 pm » wrote: ↑ Is it that far beyond your grasp of understanding that precisely how WE define a woman IS NOT THE ISSUE?
The fact is that when we see a potential Supreme Court nominee WHO IS UNABLE TO ANSWER THAT QUESTION, we should AND MUST question her ability to rule on dozens of other topics that are far less apparent and/or have been accepted as the unquestionable truth for thousands of years!
If anything, your OP exposes your severe lack of intelligence to comprehend that simple fact.
There's a nasty bit of projection, Fredo......Huey » 11 Feb 2023, 2:46 pm » wrote: ↑ You found the answer to the question you have already had answered?
I will say it is more than two. I will also say at the moment I have what I think I need. A different weapon for different types of shooting.
Just curious…you adding this to your massive database?
Explain why you need to know…again.Blackvegetable » 11 Feb 2023, 3:23 pm » wrote: ↑ There's a nasty bit of projection, Fredo......
If it was already answered, why are you yapping about "more than 2"?
There are a lot of numbers that are "more than 2", like pi.....and 11....just to name......uhhhhh......2...
I have had that for years.Vegas » 11 Feb 2023, 2:52 pm » wrote: ↑ I like what your political identity, on your profile, says: "libercon." I am going to change mine to that.
I miss classical liberals. There is nothing wrong them. It's the progressives that are evil.
Immediately, to confirm that you lied about having answered already, again.Huey » 11 Feb 2023, 3:32 pm » wrote: ↑ Explain why you need to know…again.
you should really read posts. Early I said more than 2 but less than 7. If you read posts you might remember them. Which is all you really need to know.
No, "we" DON'T have to ask! The only reason that dopes like YOU have to ask is because even far-left radical liberals like yourself honestly had no idea whatsoever that this was EVER a question that needed to be answered!Blackvegetable » 11 Feb 2023, 3:19 pm » wrote: ↑ Zeet,
Thank for that earnest effort...
In short, you HAVE to ask
Because democrats.......
Nope. That would be a lie if I said I haven’t answered already. You were answered 25 May 22. The number and type hasn’t changed.Blackvegetable » 11 Feb 2023, 3:36 pm » wrote: ↑ Immediately, to confirm that you lied about having answered already, again.
More generally, to establish that you are the one playing "gunslinger".
Acknowledge that you've been answered.
But this isn't about "norms"Zeets2 » 11 Feb 2023, 3:37 pm » wrote: ↑ No, "we" DON'T have to ask! The only reason that dopes like YOU have to ask is because even far-left radical liberals like yourself honestly had no idea whatsoever that this was EVER a question that needed to be answered!
And once that (or any other) topic is embraced so deeply by the vast number of liberal morons out there, you find it necessary to establish the fact that you too are on board with the most ignorant of your party. Might as well shout from the rooftops, "LET ME IN, PLEASE LET ME IN! I too want to play and add my voice to define deviancy further downward!"
The rest of us with active brain cells are quite content with the norms established over the past 2000+ years.
So go pin a rose on yourself, moron!
Huey » 11 Feb 2023, 3:41 pm » wrote: ↑ Nope. That would be a lie if I said I haven’t answered already. You were answered 25 May 22. The number and type hasn’t changed.
Imdomt play gunslinger. Good way to get killed.
Ok, Travis....no one has seen any picture...ever...Imdomt play gunslinger.
You do that just posting ...Good way to get killed.