Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 12 Feb 2023, 12:30 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Feb 2023, 12:30 pm

Tell me what you still don't get.

I’m good.  I answered your question.  Tell me what you still don’t get?  
 

Blackvegetable » 12 Feb 2023, 12:23 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Feb 2023, 12:23 pm

With what do you disagree?

The failure of Supply Side?

The timing? FOX began laboring it as the bathysphere SS Grifty was plumbing new depths in maladministration.

It beats the drum even harder, as inflation/gas prices/federal spending/deficit ALL fall, and Brandon sets records in job growth.

Then there's the potential of 4 billion in judgments.....


 

You sure do think outside your boxed in narrative to whom you rather be socially. Your intellectual mind took prioity over your own instinctive awareness being equally proportionately alive forward now.

You are a "soul we character" without a "sole me ancestor" performing people in reality of humanity being more than just another reproduction occupying space now genetics eternally separates while here.

Huey » 12 Feb 2023, 12:32 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Feb 2023, 12:32 pm

I’m good.  I answered your question.  Tell me what you still don’t get?

no...not one...

You've run from every one.


It's what you do.

Now make a case..

 

Blackvegetable » 12 Feb 2023, 12:41 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Feb 2023, 12:41 pm

no...not one...

You've run from every one.

It's what you do.

Now make a case..

I have no need of a case.  The only question in the OP was “thoughts?”  I answered.

I debunked your Title.

I gave my definition of “woman”.

I have previously answered you question concerning how many weapons I own.  You ram from that.  The number is more than 3 but less than 6.  Gives you two choices.  And still no point.

Blackvegetable » 12 Feb 2023, 11:45 am » wrote: ↑

12 Feb 2023, 11:45 am

Zeet,

You're owed nothing.

You're a blowhard, idiot and ****** in equal measure. 

Can you answer the question.

YOU'RE the one who called such gender dysphoria "science" despite being unable to show ANY evidence that's been tested and proven factual using any scientific method!

And OF COURSE I can define what a woman is, so read it below and educate your stupid self!:
A woman is the result when a human has two X chromosomes in their DNA, barring any mutations REGARDLESS of what her subjective feelings are.  And no amount of personal choice in grooming, dress, surgery, or voice modification can EVER change that!  THAT is what the SCIENTIFIC METHOD has proven beyond ANY non-intellectual argument.

Now, tell me why a nominee for the Supreme Court of the United States, who are supposedly among our most intelligent citizens IS SO IGNORANT OF THOSE FACTS, just as you are?
Let's just see you defend such a lack of intelligence further!
 
 

Huey » 12 Feb 2023, 12:46 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Feb 2023, 12:46 pm

I have no need of a case.  The only question in the OP was “thoughts?”  I answered.

I debunked your Title.

I gave my definition of “woman”.

I have previously answered you question concerning how many weapons I own.  You ram from that.  The number is more than 3 but less than 6.  Gives you two choices.  And still no point.

 The only question in the OP was “thoughts?”  I answered

yes. About something in particular..

your slack jawed credulity.

 I answered.

Impossible...you never do, quimmie.

 I debunked your Title.

You can't tell me what it means.

I gave my definition of “woman”.

Irrelevant....no one cares....You're a moron.

I have previously answered you question

1 keystroke.

You ram from that.  The number is more than 3 but less than 6

Still, no number..

how do you do it, Tiny?

And still no point.

No...it is obvious, and it has been explained to you.

you haven’t answered a single question...

because you're a coward.

which I don't need to go anywhere to confirm.


 

Zeets2 » 12 Feb 2023, 12:49 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Feb 2023, 12:49 pm

YOU'RE the one who called such gender dysphoria "science" despite being unable to show ANY evidence that's been tested and proven factual using any scientific method!

And OF COURSE I can define what a woman is, so read it below and educate your stupid self!:
A woman is the result when a human has two X chromosomes in their DNA, barring any mutations REGARDLESS of what her subjective feelings are.  And no amount of personal choice in grooming, dress, surgery, or voice modification can EVER change that!  THAT is what the SCIENTIFIC METHOD has proven beyond ANY non-intellectual argument.

Now, tell me why a nominee for the Supreme Court of the United States, who are supposedly among our most intelligent citizens IS SO IGNORANT OF THOSE FACTS, just as you are?
Let's just see you defend such a lack of intelligence further!

Zeet,

I don't respond to your cretinous narratives.

Tell my why you and your fellow idiots ask the question. 
 

Blackvegetable » 12 Feb 2023, 12:54 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Feb 2023, 12:54 pm

yes. About something in particular..

your slack jawed credulity.

Impossible...you never do, quimmie.

You can't tell me what it means.

Irrelevant....no one cares....You're a moron.

1 keystroke.

Still, no number..

how do you do it, Tiny?

No...it is obvious, and it has been explained to you.

you haven’t answered a single question...

because you're a coward.

which I don't need to go anywhere to confirm.

More lies….I have 5 guns, which I have told you before.  Now make you point.

Blackvegetable » 11 Feb 2023, 1:41 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Feb 2023, 1:41 pm

Go ahead...

Define "woman"...

Whyn o you keep asking if you don’t care?  Did you forget?  Senior moment? 

Huey » 12 Feb 2023, 12:58 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Feb 2023, 12:58 pm

More lies….I have 5 guns, which I have told you before.  Now make you point.

You posted that ONCE?

I've made my point more frequently in this one thread.

What did I tell you the last time you asked?

Huey » 12 Feb 2023, 1:01 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Feb 2023, 1:01 pm

Whyn o you keep asking if you don’t care?  Did you forget?  Senior moment?

Post the thread title

Blackvegetable » 12 Feb 2023, 1:03 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Feb 2023, 1:03 pm

You posted that ONCE?

I've made my point more frequently in this one thread.

What did I tell you the last time you asked?

As I thought, no point.  So you admit I have answered that in the last.  And here is what in told you last time:

That has already been explained to you.  First and foremost because I can.

Next, firearms are tools.  And different tools have different purposes.

1.  I have two semi automatic 9 mm pistols.  Both for concealed carry. One of those is the EZ version for my wife.  Google it.  But I will probably get rid of that one and go with the Glock 43x.

2.  I have a Henry 45 long colt lever action for fun.

3.  I have a 12 gouge for very occasional hunting trips and skeet.  Also a backup home defense weapon.

4.  I have a Judge for home defense.

Try to remember this for the next time you forget. 

viewtopic.php?p=2038903#p2038903

Blackvegetable » 12 Feb 2023, 12:57 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Feb 2023, 12:57 pm

Zeet,

I don't respond to your cretinous narratives.

Tell my why you and your fellow idiots ask the question.

Of course a gullible nitwit like you can't answer such a simple question and THAT'S why you refuse to respond!

And your idiot nominee was asked that question in the hopes that her answer wouldn't prove what a **** moron she is!
It's the job of the Senate Judiciary committee to uncover such ignorance, and use the criteria of her answers to determine if she's suitable for the position of making wise and valid judicial decisions for the country, and clearly SHE IS NOT QUALIFIED, much like the **** moron of a president who was dumb enough to nominate her in the first place!  And of course, you support HIS incredible ignorance as well!
AND SHE FAILED THAT TEST WITH FLYING COLORS, just as you did!

And what's even funnier is that you're such a gullible moron, that you believe it's your duty to defend the most asinine fools in the party YOU call home, which you've done by exposing your own ignorance with such a stupid OP!
 

Blackvegetable » 12 Feb 2023, 1:04 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Feb 2023, 1:04 pm

Post the thread title

Nobody cares…
If you have a point you can.  I have already addressed and debunked it.  Earlier, when I answered the thread title you whined I needed to address the OP.  You sound confused, lost.
 

Blackvegetable » 12 Feb 2023, 1:04 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Feb 2023, 1:04 pm

Post the thread title

**** your demands, narcissist. 

And post a new OP, get your punishment over with. 

Now!

Huey » 12 Feb 2023, 1:09 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Feb 2023, 1:09 pm

Nobody cares…
If you have a point you can.  I have already address and debunked it.  Earlier, when I answered the thread title you whined I needed to address the OP.  You sound confused, lost.

Post the thread title.

You're confused and need to re-center..

 

Blackvegetable » 12 Feb 2023, 1:10 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Feb 2023, 1:10 pm

Post the thread title.

You're confused and need to re-center..

Nobody cares…
If you have a point you can.  I have already address and debunked it.  Earlier, when I answered the thread title you whined I needed to address the OP.  You sound confused, lost.

Zeets2 » 12 Feb 2023, 1:09 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Feb 2023, 1:09 pm

Of course a gullible nitwit like you can't answer such a simple question and THAT'S why you refuse to respond!

And your idiot nominee was asked that question in the hopes that her answer wouldn't prove what a **** moron she is!
It's the job of the Senate Judiciary committee to uncover such ignorance, and use the criteria of her answers to determine if she's suitable for the position of making wise and valid judicial decisions for the country, and clearly SHE IS NOT QUALIFIED, much like the **** moron of a president who was dumb enough to nominate her in the first place!  And of course, you support HIS incredible ignorance as well!
AND SHE FAILED THAT TEST WITH FLYING COLORS, just as you did!

And what's even funnier is that you're such a gullible moron, that you believe it's your duty to defend the most asinine fools in the party YOU call home, which you've done by exposing your own ignorance with such a stupid OP!

So tell me WHY you and your fellow rubes labor the matter...

I say it is because Supply Side failed again.

 

Huey » 12 Feb 2023, 1:11 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Feb 2023, 1:11 pm

 

Challenge: Can Any Of You FOX Dependent Slack Jaws Tell Me Why You Need "Woman" Defined For You?


Can you, quimmie?

Blackvegetable » 12 Feb 2023, 1:12 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Feb 2023, 1:12 pm

Challenge: Can Any Of You FOX Dependent Slack Jaws Tell Me Why You Need "Woman" Defined For You?

Can you, quimmie?

I already posted my definition.  Meaning I don’t need if defined for me.  Told you that yesterday.  Multiple times.