Liberal Forum

Huey » 12 Feb 2023, 1:16 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Feb 2023, 1:16 pm

I already posted my definition.  Meaning I don’t need if defined for me.  Told you that yesterday.  Multiple times.

Meaning I don’t need if defined for me.  Told you that yesterday.  Multiple times.

WHY DO YOU ASK, THEN?

no one asked you for your definition.

holy **** are you **** stupid.

Blackvegetable » 12 Feb 2023, 1:12 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Feb 2023, 1:12 pm

So tell me WHY you and your fellow rubes labor the matter...

I say it is because Supply Side failed again.

Gee, how come you suddenly have the need to change the subject after getting your *** so thoroughly kicked?

Explain how exposing the ignorance of a Supreme Court nominee has ANYTHING to do with whether the economic policies of supply side results in successes or failures?

And I've already explained why it matters.  The entire process of learning whether or not a SC nominee is qualified for the position IS DETERMINED by exactly those type of questions!  And an imbecile that doesn't know what makes a female a woman IS CLEARLY UNQUALIFIED TO MAKE JUDGEMENTAL DECISIONS ON ANY OTHER MATTER BEFORE THE COURT!
 

Blackvegetable » 12 Feb 2023, 1:18 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Feb 2023, 1:18 pm

WHY DO YOU ASK, THEN?

no one asked you for your definition.

holy **** are you **** stupid.

You have been screeching for two days demanding people define it.  

As I told you since I don’t need woman defined for me that debunks the OP.  Are your dense?  You are stupid.

Zeets2 » 12 Feb 2023, 1:19 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Feb 2023, 1:19 pm

Gee, how come you suddenly have the need to change the subject after getting your *** so thoroughly kicked?

Explain how exposing the ignorance of a Supreme Court nominee has ANYTHING to do with whether the economic policies of supply side results in successes or failures?

And I've already explained why it matters.  The entire process of learning whether or not a SC nominee is qualified for the position IS DETERMINED by exactly those type of questions!  And an imbecile that doesn't know what makes a female a woman IS CLEARLY UNQUALIFIED TO MAKE JUDGEMENTAL DECISIONS ON ANY OTHER MATTER BEFORE THE COURT!

Post the thread title, you stupid piece of ****.

golfboy » 11 Feb 2023, 10:30 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Feb 2023, 10:30 pm

We're the ones who know what a woman is and which bathroom to use. 
You're the idiots trying to redefine gender roles because you have nor morals, or understanding of science.

Beevee INSISTS that women can have dicks, and brags about how many "women" he has dated.

Then he gets pissy when we ask him to define woman.

I'm no mathematorian, but this sitchiashun don't call for algabraic geometrics, either. 
 

Huey » 12 Feb 2023, 1:19 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Feb 2023, 1:19 pm

You have been screeching for two days demanding people define it.  

As I told you since I don’t need woman defined for me that debunks the OP.  Are your dense?  You are stupid.

Challenge: Can Any Of You FOX Dependent Slack Jaws Tell Me Why You Need "Woman" Defined For You?


Read it slowly, Verbul..
 

Cannonpointer » 12 Feb 2023, 1:20 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Feb 2023, 1:20 pm

Beevee INSISTS that women can have dicks, and brags about how many "women" he has dated.

Then he gets pissy when we ask him to define woman.

I'm no mathematorian, but this sitchiashun don't call for algabraic geometrics, either.

that women can have dicks,

They often suck them.

You suck a lot of cock.


Are you a woman?

Blackvegetable » 12 Feb 2023, 1:21 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Feb 2023, 1:21 pm

Challenge: Can Any Of You FOX Dependent Slack Jaws Tell Me Why You Need "Woman" Defined For You?

Read it slowly, Verbul..

Strikethrough and you are still projecting. You are blaming others for you not knowing what a woman is. 

Your next OP will be trashed for this redundancy. 

Blackvegetable » 12 Feb 2023, 1:21 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Feb 2023, 1:21 pm

Challenge: Can Any Of You FOX Dependent Slack Jaws Tell Me Why You Need "Woman" Defined For You?

Read it slowly, Verbul..

Read it carefully, Mary.  Pat attention to the second sentence.  I don’t need it defined for me.  

You have been screeching for two days demanding people define it.  

As I told you since I don’t need woman defined for me that debunks the OP.  Are your dense?  You are stupid.

Huey » 12 Feb 2023, 1:19 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Feb 2023, 1:19 pm

You have been screeching for two days demanding people define it.  

As I told you since I don’t need woman defined for me that debunks the OP.  Are your dense?  You are stupid.

As I just told golfboy, this is not hard math.

Beevee INSISTS that women can have dicks, and brags about how many "women" he has dated.

Then he gets pissy when we ask him to define woman.

I'm no mathematorian, but this sitchiashun don't call for algabraic geometrics, either. 
 

Blackvegetable » 12 Feb 2023, 1:22 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Feb 2023, 1:22 pm

Are you a woman?

This is why we suggest you learn to define woman, fruitcake. 

You live your "life" in a state of cucked confusion.
 

Huey » 12 Feb 2023, 1:23 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Feb 2023, 1:23 pm

Read it carefully, Mary.  Pat attention to the second sentence.  I don’t need it defined for me.  

You have been screeching for two days demanding people define it.  

As I told you since I don’t need woman defined for me that debunks the OP.  Are your dense?  You are stupid.

THEN WHY DO YOU ASK?


what a **** idiot.


 

FJB » 12 Feb 2023, 9:00 am » wrote: ↑

12 Feb 2023, 9:00 am

LOL, I have more land and open space than you do bitch.

The only land you have is your expansive white ***, and the space is the space between your ears.
 

Blackvegetable » 12 Feb 2023, 1:26 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Feb 2023, 1:26 pm

THEN WHY DO YOU ASK?

what a **** idiot.

Meltdown Mary,

Why did you ask?  YOU tagged me why bakc in the second post of this thread.  Now you are just repeating yourself. Getting old is a bitch.

So why does it matter if I have 5 firearms?

Cannonpointer » 12 Feb 2023, 1:26 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Feb 2023, 1:26 pm

This is why we suggest you learn to define woman, fruitcake. 

You live your "life" in a state of cucked confusion.

Answer the question. 

Blackvegetable » 12 Feb 2023, 1:19 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Feb 2023, 1:19 pm

Post the thread title, you stupid piece of ****.

I've explained PRECISELY why we need to hear a SC NOMINEE respond to such a question.

The inquisitor DOES NOT need to defend his own definition of a woman, you idiot!
Neither he or I have even the slightest doubt as to how a woman is defined!  The Senate Judiciary committee is there to learn if the nominee has the wisdom and the ability to make decisions for the benefit of the country based on the accepted norms of what thousands of years of history have taught us.

AND IT'S CLEAR THAT SHE DOESN'T!!

And you can't stand seeing the nominee of the moron you voted for having her ignorance exposed before the world, can you?
 

Huey » 12 Feb 2023, 1:29 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Feb 2023, 1:29 pm

Meltdown Mary,

Why did you ask?  YOU tagged me why bakc in the second post of this thread.  Now you are just repeating yourself. Getting old is a bitch.

So why does it matter if I have 5 firearms?

First answer the question, Tiny.

Then your diversion.

Blackvegetable » 12 Feb 2023, 1:29 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Feb 2023, 1:29 pm

Answer the question.

Seriously? A lob?

If you insist. 

No questions, dick sucker.

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/be/10/d3 ... fb8c8a.gif
 

Blackvegetable » 12 Feb 2023, 1:30 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Feb 2023, 1:30 pm

First answer the question, Tiny.

Then your diversion.

You questions have been answered

Meltdown Mary,

Why did you ask?  YOU tagged me why bakc in the second post of this thread.  Now you are just repeating yourself. Getting old is a bitch.

So why does it matter if I have 5 firearms?

Cannonpointer » 12 Feb 2023, 1:26 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Feb 2023, 1:26 pm

This is why we suggest you learn to define woman, fruitcake. 

 

You cocksuckers don’t know the difference between woman and female any better than you know the difference between climate and weather.