Then put that cock back in your mouth...Cannonpointer » 12 Feb 2023, 1:31 pm » wrote: ↑ Seriously? A lob?
If you insist.
No questions, dick sucker.
https://i.pinimg.com/originals/be/10/d3 ... fb8c8a.gif
Many of these idiots can't SPELL "woman"IkeBana » 12 Feb 2023, 1:31 pm » wrote: ↑ You cocksuckers don’t know the difference between woman and female any better than you know the difference between climate and weather.
Post the thread title.Zeets2 » 12 Feb 2023, 1:29 pm » wrote: ↑ I've explained PRECISELY why we need to hear a SC NOMINEE respond to such a question.
The inquisitor DOES NOT need to defend his own definition of a woman, you idiot!
Neither he or I have even the slightest doubt as to how a woman is defined! The Senate Judiciary committee is there to learn if the nominee has the wisdom and the ability to make decisions for the benefit of the country based on the accepted norms of what thousands of years of history have taught us.
AND IT'S CLEAR THAT SHE DOESN'T!!
And you can't stand seeing the nominee of the moron you voted for having her ignorance exposed before the world, can you?
FOS already defined it for the ***: A human with XX chormosomes.Zeets2 » 12 Feb 2023, 1:29 pm » wrote: ↑ I've explained PRECISELY why we need to hear a SC NOMINEE respond to such a question.
The inquisitor DOES NOT need to defend his own definition of a woman, you idiot!
Neither he or I have even the slightest doubt as to how a woman is defined! The Senate Judiciary committee is there to learn if the nominee has the wisdom and the ability to make decisions for the benefit of the country based on the accepted norms of what thousands of years of history have taught us.
AND IT'S CLEAR THAT SHE DOESN'T!!
And you can't stand seeing the nominee of the moron you voted for having her ignorance exposed before the world, can you?
*** sure likes to talk about *** ****.Blackvegetable » 12 Feb 2023, 1:22 pm » wrote: ↑ They often suck them.
You suck a lot of cock.
Are you a woman?
Blackvegetable » 12 Feb 2023, 1:21 pm » wrote: ↑Challenge: Can Any Of You FOX Dependent Slack Jaws Tell Me Why You Need "Woman" Defined For You?Huey » 12 Feb 2023, 1:19 pm » wrote: ↑ You have been screeching for two days demanding people define it.
As I told you since I don’t need woman defined for me that debunks the OP. Are your dense? You are stupid.
Read it slowly, Verbul..
You just posted the thread title. Another senior moment? Make a point.Blackvegetable » 12 Feb 2023, 1:33 pm » wrote: ↑Post the thread title.Zeets2 » 12 Feb 2023, 1:29 pm » wrote: ↑ I've explained PRECISELY why we need to hear a SC NOMINEE respond to such a question.
The inquisitor DOES NOT need to defend his own definition of a woman, you idiot!
Neither he or I have even the slightest doubt as to how a woman is defined! The Senate Judiciary committee is there to learn if the nominee has the wisdom and the ability to make decisions for the benefit of the country based on the accepted norms of what thousands of years of history have taught us.
AND IT'S CLEAR THAT SHE DOESN'T!!
And you can't stand seeing the nominee of the moron you voted for having her ignorance exposed before the world, can you?
Then shut the **** up.
You been told why we want you to define it, cuck. You pretend to support women, you owe a definition of woman. You pretend to date women, and then insist that dicks do not disqualify a person from womanhood. It is appearing more and more probable that cunnilingus pushes against your tonsils, boy. Your hysteria at being axed for a definition rather feeds that suspicion, fruity. As does your common cuckery.
Your "thread title" is completely incongruous, as is your childish argument!
A woman is a human with xx chromosomes, science denying old perv.IkeBana » 12 Feb 2023, 1:31 pm » wrote: ↑ You cocksuckers don’t know the difference between woman and female any better than you know the difference between climate and weather.
Define cock, rube. Is it a female organ, ever?
Answer the question, fluffing coward.Zeets2 » 12 Feb 2023, 1:38 pm » wrote: ↑ Your "thread title" is completely incongruous, as is your childish argument!
I DO NOT "need" you or anyone else to define what a woman is!
Apparently, a **** moron like you does!
Which question? You’ve made demands and have Asked multiple questions.
What is Funk&Wagnalls telling you?
Challenge: Can Any Of You FOX Dependent Slack Jaws Tell Me Why You Need "Woman" Defined For You?Huey » 12 Feb 2023, 1:40 pm » wrote: ↑ Which question? You’ve made demands and have Asked multiple questions.
I didn't ask funk and wagnalls, fruity. YOU brought up cock. Tell us whether it is a female organ at times.
We have answered that a dozen times, moron.Blackvegetable » 12 Feb 2023, 1:41 pm » wrote: ↑ Challenge: Can Any Of You FOX Dependent Slack Jaws Tell Me Why You Need "Woman" Defined For You?
Unreal....literally dumber than ****.
I did, ******!
Mary,Blackvegetable » 12 Feb 2023, 1:41 pm » wrote: ↑ Challenge: Can Any Of You FOX Dependent Slack Jaws Tell Me Why You Need "Woman" Defined For You?
Unreal....literally dumber than ****.
Isn't that your Science go-to?Cannonpointer » 12 Feb 2023, 1:42 pm » wrote: ↑ I didn't ask funk and wagnalls, fruity. YOU brought up cock. Tell us whether it is a female organ at times.
How does it feel to have painted your own stupid *** into a corner, fool?
No...it doesn't explain why either of you ask.Huey » 12 Feb 2023, 1:44 pm » wrote: ↑ Mary,
He already posted his definition meaning he also doesn’t need woman defined for him.