Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 12 Feb 2023, 2:20 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Feb 2023, 2:20 pm

Do you disagree that Supply Side has failed, repeatedly?

You don't need to contradict my opinion....

and you're asking me to define "woman"...

why?

Told you why.  Using your theory.  

murdock » 12 Feb 2023, 2:25 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Feb 2023, 2:25 pm

He don't care as long as he can suck them.

He claims to date a lot of women.

He also claims that a lot of women have dicks.

The math gets pretty simple pretty quick - ESPECIALLY when he gets hysterical because we ax him to define woman. 
 

Huey » 12 Feb 2023, 2:26 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Feb 2023, 2:26 pm

Told you why.  Using your theory.

Not ONE question. 

You yapped about not having to contradict..

You can't. 

Now the next part.

Do you believe FOX is laboring this because everything thing they've flacked for over the past 30 years has failed - spectacularly?
 

Cannonpointer » 12 Feb 2023, 2:27 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Feb 2023, 2:27 pm

He claims to date a lot of women.

He also claims that a lot of women have dicks.

The math gets pretty simple pretty quick - ESPECIALLY when he gets hysterical because we ax him to define woman.

Did you just say "math"?


 

Blackvegetable » 12 Feb 2023, 2:29 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Feb 2023, 2:29 pm

Not ONE question. 

You yapped about not having to contradict..

You can't. 

Now the next part.

Do you believe FOX is laboring this because everything thing they've flacked for over the past 30 years has failed - spectacularly?

Before I answer ANYMORE questions define woman and prove you are intelligent enough to participate.

Huey » 12 Feb 2023, 2:25 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Feb 2023, 2:25 pm

Keep lying….my very first post.

That is a response.

Not an answer.


 

Blackvegetable » 12 Feb 2023, 2:30 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Feb 2023, 2:30 pm

Did you just say "math"?

Did you just panty dance around the fact that your title question got stuff down your throat, fruitcake?

We challenge you to define woman because you jackasses are calling anything and everything a woman. You are sending men into women's sports and insisting they are women "because they SAY they are women."

That's is an anti-science proposition. 

Can you EVER address my anwer, you plaintive little weasel?
 

Huey » 12 Feb 2023, 2:31 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Feb 2023, 2:31 pm

Before I answer ANYMORE questions define woman and prove you are intelligent enough to participate.

Answer the first....
 

Cannonpointer » 12 Feb 2023, 2:33 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Feb 2023, 2:33 pm

Did you just panty dance around the fact that your title question got stuff down your throat, fruitcake?

We challenge you to define woman because you jackasses are calling anything and everything a woman. You are sending men into women's sports and insisting they are women "because they SAY they are women."

That's is an anti-science proposition.

Can you EVER address my anwer, you plaintive little weasel?

Go sit in the corner with Tiny.

 

Blackvegetable » 12 Feb 2023, 2:32 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Feb 2023, 2:32 pm

That is a response.

Not an answer.

Your turn.  After you.

Blackvegetable » 12 Feb 2023, 2:33 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Feb 2023, 2:33 pm

Answer the first....

Ok, Bv can’t define woman.  That proves he is not smart enough to be in this conversation.

Huey » 12 Feb 2023, 2:35 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Feb 2023, 2:35 pm

Your turn.  After you.

No...the thread title came first.


I'm still waiting. 
 

Blackvegetable » 12 Feb 2023, 2:30 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Feb 2023, 2:30 pm

Did you just say "math"?


 

simple arithmatic. origins of ancestral progression become 1 of 16 great great grandparents of each great great grandchild changing poulation of a species 5 generation gaps present.

It is a 30 into 1 compression ration of combined DNA linking all 5 generation gaps to specific displacement being one of a kind adapting to the shared moment occupying space native to this atmosphere and specific ancestry before one's arriving regardles male or female homo sapien reproduction, with or without birth defects happening between conceived and birth.

6th generation forward is just a repeat of the original 5 never same populaiotn since originals conceived another generation gap. So there is a New World Order of reproductions arriving one at a time never same populaiton again here now.

Extinction arriving is when great great grandchildren aren't born anymore as currenty they still are a eternally separated to this point.

Watch you deny this applies within the whole food chain native to this atmosphere since it takes rocket science to escape it when everything is naturally insulated from the rest of the universe by the atmosphere present.

the whether systems of organized doubt have divided generation gaps into self fulfilling prophecies each generation ignoring the basics in evolving never staying same population again, living doesn't exceed being ancestrally positioned now.

So what is relative time logistics factually about? Denying the time one gets since conceived is limited to behavior of each stereotype protecting their own type cast leaderships all demanding human rights to eliminate honesty anytime someone can show where humanity went completely corrupt hiding in plain sight with power of suggesting now never was genetics eternally spearating current populaiton now.

Blackvegetable » 12 Feb 2023, 2:36 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Feb 2023, 2:36 pm

No...the thread title came first.

I'm still waiting.

Which I answered on 10 Feb at 1055 with my very first post.

Stop lying.  

Blackvegetable » 12 Feb 2023, 2:34 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Feb 2023, 2:34 pm

Cannonpointer » 12 Feb 2023, 2:33 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Feb 2023, 2:33 pm

You are sending men into women's sports and insisting they are women "because they SAY they are women."

That's is an anti-science proposition. 

Can you EVER address my anwer, you plaintive little weasel?

Go sit in the corner with Tiny.

So that's a no.

That's what I expected, Pook.
 
 

Huey » 12 Feb 2023, 2:35 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Feb 2023, 2:35 pm

Ok, Bv can’t define woman.  That proves he is not smart enough to be in this conversation.

Tiny,

I have already done so..

You have yet to answer the OP.


 

Blackvegetable » 12 Feb 2023, 2:37 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Feb 2023, 2:37 pm

Tiny,

I have already done so..

You have yet to answer the OP.

I had to post my answer multiple times.  You’re turn.  

Make up your mind.  Op or thread title?  Youre confused. 

Blackvegetable » 12 Feb 2023, 2:37 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Feb 2023, 2:37 pm

Tiny,

I have already done so..

You have yet to answer the OP.

STFU, you never answer anything

Huey » 12 Feb 2023, 2:38 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Feb 2023, 2:38 pm

I had to post my answer multiple times.  You’re turn.  

Make up your mind.  Op or thread title?  Youre confused.

You've never answered...

You responded.


 

Blackvegetable » 12 Feb 2023, 2:40 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Feb 2023, 2:40 pm

You've never answered...

You responded.

Nope.

Im off to the store.  Which of my two sidearms should I carry?