A grain of salt is healthy. A pound of salt drowns the story. You did not take any time to verify the information before attempting to discredit the source.Cannonpointer » 12 Feb 2023, 3:06 pm » wrote: ↑ Yes, kid. I am down the rabbit hole.
I take everything the media says - ESPECIALLY on this topic - with a grain of salt.
I learned that from YOU, dad.slideman » 12 Feb 2023, 3:08 pm » wrote: ↑ A grain of salt is healthy. A pound of salt drowns the story. You did not take any time to verify the information before attempting to discredit the source.
Keep trying
Labeling something defeats free speech rights how, precisely?slideman » 11 Feb 2023, 5:59 pm » wrote: ↑ U.S. Accuses Zero Hedge of Spreading Russian Propaganda
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles ... propaganda
lol
Her mother is pretty loveable. But EVERYONE?
Polish General Skshipchak said that Ukraine has no forces for an offensive.The Ukrainian army does not have the means for offensive actions, the situation is close to complete defeat, the former commander of the Polish ground forces, General Waldemar Skshipchak, said in an interview with the portal Wirtualna Polska.Meanwhile, German Leopard-2 tanks will be in Ukraine at the end of March according to the Minister of Defense Boris PistoriusAlso adding to the potential tank capabilities, Ukrainian crews that arrived in the UK last week will be using Challenger 2 tanks to defend Ukraine next month, UK prime minister Sunak says.Responding to the supply of tanks by Europe to Ukraine, Russia says it will increase tank production in response to Western arms supplies to Ukraine, according to for Russia President, Dmitry Medvedev.In related news, the issue of long-range weapons and fighters for Ukraine has been resolved, said the Head of Ukraine's Presidents office, Yermak.Poland says it is ready to supply Ukraine with fighter jets, but will not be first among NATO countries.Earlier this week, Russian President Putin held an operational meeting with members of the Russian Security Council. It was the first time such a meeting has happened at night. https://halturnerradioshow.com/index.ph ... ete-defeatslideman » 12 Feb 2023, 3:08 pm » wrote: ↑ A grain of salt is healthy. A pound of salt drowns the story. You did not take any time to verify the information before attempting to discredit the source.
Keep trying
Your question makes no sense at all. You also seem incapable of distinguishing the fact that people are individuals and that each one of them has his own set of political beliefs that differ from everyone else.Cannonpointer » 12 Feb 2023, 3:10 pm » wrote: ↑ Labeling something defeats free speech rights how, precisely?
Hurry, show us your "liberalism."
PUTIN IS NOT USING PRISONERS TO PROP UP THE FRONT LINES. THATS PROPAGANDA.johndnorth » 12 Feb 2023, 1:45 pm » wrote: ↑ Why do we never see casualty figures for the Ukrainian fighters? Putin is mobilizing another 500,000 men. The Wagner group has been forbidden to recruit from Russian prisons. Putin is now recruiting from prisons. In Russia there is a limited amount of resistance to Putin policy in Ukraine. This resistance is in the form of demonstrations. The resistance is not amounting to much and Putin will just keep grinding the Ukrainians. Criminals are tossed into the front lines and decimated. Even though the Russian criminals are killed in vast numbers they undoubtedly kill some Ukrainians along the way. Putin is now in a war of attrition against Ukraine. Over the long haul Putin will outlast Ukraine.
Even if the criminals don't kill a single ukie, they eat a bullet and clear a cell and spare a regular troop.johndnorth » 12 Feb 2023, 1:45 pm » wrote: ↑ Why do we never see casualty figures for the Ukrainian fighters? Putin is mobilizing another 500,000 men. The Wagner group has been forbidden to recruit from Russian prisons. Putin is now recruiting from prisons. In Russia there is a limited amount of resistance to Putin policy in Ukraine. This resistance is in the form of demonstrations. The resistance is not amounting to much and Putin will just keep grinding the Ukrainians. Criminals are tossed into the front lines and decimated. Even though the Russian criminals are killed in vast numbers they undoubtedly kill some Ukrainians along the way. Putin is now in a war of attrition against Ukraine. Over the long haul Putin will outlast Ukraine.
That's why we values free speech, pookie.slideman » 12 Feb 2023, 3:15 pm » wrote: ↑ Your question makes no sense at all. You also seem incapable of distinguishing the fact that people are individuals and that each one of them has his own set of political beliefs that differ from everyone else.
You certainly aren't, fruitcake. Liberals stand for free speech. They don't celebrate it being censored.slideman » 12 Feb 2023, 3:15 pm » wrote: ↑ You want to label me a liberal but I am not your standard idea of what a liberal is at all.
Your idea of censorship is when a private company doesn't want hate speech on its own website or doesn't want to traffic with people who have hate speech on their linked websites.Cannonpointer » 12 Feb 2023, 3:23 pm » wrote: ↑ That's why we values free speech, pookie.
Simply labeling it "propaganda" does not overcome the first Amendment.
You certainly aren't, fruitcake. Liberals stand for free speech. They don't celebrate it being censored.
You're not very bright are you
Publicly traded companies are not private, pookie, and are not allowed to violate public policy. The supreme court distinguished between publicly traded companies and privately held ones in the Hobby Lobby decision.
Inventing a facile construction called "hate speech" with no legal definition is propaganda, fruity - falling for it is unmasculine, ******.
My idea of censorship is when the FBI gives them marching orders, fruitcake. Or when one campaign or another is allowed to dictate what does and does not get seen by the public - on a PUBLICLY TRADED platform.slideman » 12 Feb 2023, 3:25 pm » wrote: ↑ on its own website or doesn't want to traffic with people who have hate speech on their linked websites.
It's not their platform. It's a public platform, responsible to maintain public policy. It's a corporation - it has LESS rights than a person, you stooge - not more.slideman » 12 Feb 2023, 3:25 pm » wrote: ↑ You are very in favor of free speech until it comes to the free speech of these companies to who can choose whatever they want to put on their platform.
It's none of your goddamn business
@slideman As you can see, I am not the only one who sees your blatant hypocrisy.Cannonpointer » 12 Feb 2023, 3:44 pm » wrote: ↑
If facebook decided to follow Hobby Lobby and tell obama to **** off with regard to to providing every service required by the legislation, you would suddenly understand - with miraculous speed and clarity - the difference between private firms and publicly held ones, hypocrite.
Cannonpointer » 12 Feb 2023, 3:44 pm » wrote: ↑ Publicly traded companies are not private, pookie, and are not allowed to violate public policy. The supreme court distinguished between publicly traded companies and privately held ones in the Hobby Lobby decision.
If facebook decided to follow Hobby Lobby and tell obama to **** off with regard to to providing every service required by the legislation, you would suddenly understand - with miraculous speed and clarity - the difference between private firms and publicly held ones, hypocrite.
Inventing a facile construction called "hate speech" with no legal definition is propaganda, fruity - falling for it is unmasculine, ******.
My idea of censorship is when the FBI gives them marching orders, fruitcake. Or when one campaign or another is allowed to dictate what does and does not get seen by the public - on a PUBLICLY TRADED platform.
It's not their platform. It's a public platform, responsible to maintain public policy. It's a corporation - it has LESS rights than a person, you stooge - not more.
You're not very smart are you
I have been responsible for him abandoning multiple threads.Vegas » 12 Feb 2023, 3:56 pm » wrote: ↑ You have just utterly nuked him. He literally has radiation emanating from his person. It is now necessary to wear a HAZMAT suit within a 50-mile radius of him.
slideman » 11 Feb 2023, 2:26 pm » wrote: ↑ "With repeated disasters near Vuhledar, a failed attack based out of Kreminna, and what looks to be two full companies lost in a fruitless assault on Avdiivka, Russia has been throwing away its troops at a sustained rate far greater than it did at any point in 2022."
https://m.dailykos.com/stories/2023/2/1 ... aults-fail
BlueDevil » 12 Feb 2023, 3:33 pm » wrote: ↑ It's hard to find accurate casualty numbers, but it's clearly in Ukraine's favor to some extent. That only continues as long as American weapons and aid flow into the country. Russia isn't in any danger of running out of troops or weapons anytime soon. At some point we have to tell Ukraine it's time to step to the negotiating table.
https://www.france24.com/en/live-news/2 ... egian-army
Vegas » 12 Feb 2023, 3:54 pm » wrote: ↑ @slideman As you can see, I am not the only one who sees your blatant hypocrisy.