That reinforces my point you idiotLincolnNebraska » 15 Feb 2023, 1:43 pm » wrote: ↑ You just reinforced what he said in your own article: Britannica says: "Some of Hitler’s other enemies were also murdered,..."
It contradicts it.
Can't even make a point without using profanity.slideman » 15 Feb 2023, 1:53 pm » wrote: ↑ Hitler's idea of an enemy was anyone in a opposing political party posed a threat to his power.
You mother **** are totally out to lunch
Hitler apologist so I can't **** believe it.
What a bunch of **** assholes
**** Americans
LincolnNebraska » 15 Feb 2023, 1:29 pm » wrote: ↑ The lecture snippet makes no sense. Germany was in horrible ruins after WW I. The Nazi leadership resurrected the country’s economy and spirit, despite world condemnation and boycotts. Camp laborers is a documented historical fact, and yet this pop psychologist professor rabidly spews afternoon tv theology.
Any adult should be able to see how Germany’s pre-WWII state contradicts Peterson, but they hang on his every word like a tv pitchman flipping houses. He looks like a cultist with a zombie tranced audience. Many people—and college students especially—are so steeped in non-critical thinking that that will never see the irony in being awestruck from charisma over well-documented history.
You realize that the night of the long knives had nothing to do with people disagreeing with Hitler.. right?slideman » 15 Feb 2023, 1:34 pm » wrote: ↑ Yeah sure right Hitler had nothing to say or do about people who disagreed with him.
You think you're going to sell anyone that line of crap?
https://www.britannica.com/event/Night- ... ong-Knives
Dunno. Why?roadkill » 15 Feb 2023, 2:37 pm » wrote: ↑ Peterson also bashes Trudeau...is he wrong about that too?
Not really.