None of this has anything to do with slavery. America was not built on the backs of slaves. The fact that you are going into what blacks did or didn't do - post civil war, shows me that you and I are really not in disagreement on this essential fact.Vegas » 15 Feb 2023, 12:28 pm » wrote: ↑ Cheap labor = enormous profits.
At first, it was almost free labor: enormous profits and industrial progress.
After war, blacks got paid slave wages, compared to the whites: enormous profits and industrial progress.
words mean things, in the meantime obey the law of the land or else.Skans » 15 Feb 2023, 1:07 pm » wrote: ↑ None of this has anything to do with slavery. America was not built on the backs of slaves. The fact that you are going into what blacks did or didn't do - post civil war, shows me that you and I are really not in disagreement on this essential fact.
Skans » 15 Feb 2023, 1:07 pm » wrote: ↑ None of this has anything to do with slavery. America was not built on the backs of slaves. The fact that you are going into what blacks did or didn't do - post civil war, shows me that you and I are really not in disagreement on this essential fact.
No one was responsible for their "slavery mindset". That's on them. They didn't come to America "equal in society". They were essentially no-skill, non-educated, laborers. Lots of people weren't treated fairly - the Irish, Chinese, Jews, Italians, Germans, Swedes - ****, you could go on and on about this.Vegas » 15 Feb 2023, 1:10 pm » wrote: ↑ How so? The slavery mindset was still alive and well. Just because they were free doesn't mean the that society thought their place in society was equal. Lincoln made some great speeches about it, but that's not what happened. I am trying to explain that it was slavery that instilled the idea of blacks being unequal into the minds of employers. Again, legally they were no longer slaves. But socially they were.
Skans » 15 Feb 2023, 1:44 pm » wrote: ↑ No one was responsible for their "slavery mindset". That's on them. They didn't come to America "equal in society". They were essentially no-skill, non-educated, laborers. Lots of people weren't treated fairly - the Irish, Chinese, Jews, Italians, Germans, Swedes - ****, you could go on and on about this.
Society was much harsher back then - free men were responsible for their own. If you couldn't make it, then you and your family starved. This wasn't only for Blacks.
Vegas » 15 Feb 2023, 1:46 pm » wrote: ↑ We keep going around and around about that. The whites were unskilled and uneducated also. I said that about 600 times now.
All things were equal, except their status.
Skans » 15 Feb 2023, 1:49 pm » wrote: ↑
- Whites could speak english and were more skilled. Blacks had no skills.
- Women didn't get paid the same as men either
- Irish couldn't find jobs
- Chinese immigrant workers didn't get paid the same as whites.
- Once the Blacks were freed - America, from that time forward, was not built upon slave labor.
Some spoke some unintelligible form of English. Not all black slaves spoke English.Vegas » 15 Feb 2023, 1:53 pm » wrote: ↑
- Blacks spoke English also. Neither had skills.
- They got paid more than blacks.
- Because they were competing with the blacks since the blacks worked slave wages, hence the riots.
- They got paid more than blacks.
- Yes, it was. From very cheap labor costs.
Skans » 15 Feb 2023, 1:55 pm » wrote: ↑ Some spoke some unintelligible form of English. Not all black slaves spoke English.
Getting paid more than blacks is not equivalent to America being built on the back of Slaves. As I said, Men got paid more than Women too.
It's been 6 generations since slavery ended, the only noticeable black advancement has been due to interracial marriage and the subsequent genetic improvement.slideman » 14 Feb 2023, 2:33 pm » wrote: ↑ Whether you realize it or not you have given a very good summary of critical race Theory. Thank you
You have argued with eggplant so long you don't know how to discuss actual evolving when genetics eternally separates each reproduction naturally here.Vegas » 15 Feb 2023, 1:46 pm » wrote: ↑ We keep going around and around about that. The whites were unskilled and uneducated also. I said that about 600 times now.
All things were equal, except their status.
What farming is needed living in the tropics where food is always in season. or tribes migrated with the animals each season. Nomads, hunter gathers. wow you really don't venture beyond a specific talking point while preaching 6 degrees of separation during a two sided debate on a singular details over and in the past as quick as it arrived..Xavier_Onassis » 15 Feb 2023, 3:56 pm » wrote: ↑ No one was responsible for their "slavery mindset". That's on them. They didn't come to America "equal in society". They were essentially no-skill, non-educated, laborers. Lots of people weren't treated fairly - the Irish, Chinese, Jews, Italians, Germans, Swedes - ****, you could go on and on about this.
Most immigrants,even slaves, were familiar with farming and livestock. These may have been considered menial chores, but they do require skills. It would be amusing to watch any of you righties hitch up a team and plow a field.
As long as people believe it, you will repeat it.Warcok » 15 Feb 2023, 4:16 pm » wrote: ↑ We inherit our wealth off the back of hard working Americans I'll say. 😁
You clearly know nothing of the South. The pre civil war South was agrarian. The economy was heavily dependent on agriculture and farming. People worked on large plantations to grow crops. It was far less industrialized than the North. Whatever little industry there was, it was completely destroyed during the war. As were the large plantations.Vegas » 15 Feb 2023, 2:01 pm » wrote: ↑ There were 5 million dirt poor whites in the South just before the war broke out. They spoke like 3rd graders. No different than blacks. Most couldn't even read/write. They had no skills either, nor were they educated.
Doesn't matter that women were paid less than white men. Blacks were always at the bottom of the pyramid and made up most of the tough labor like building the railroads, hammering the iron for the steel, and other factory hard labor tasks. And yes, the South still had factories, they weren't completely nuked.
Skans » 15 Feb 2023, 4:17 pm » wrote: ↑ You clearly know nothing of the South. The pre civil war South was agrarian. The economy was heavily dependent on agriculture and farming. People worked on large plantations to grow crops. It was far less industrialized than the North. Whatever little industry there was, it was completely destroyed during the war. As were the large plantations.
The south was not an industrial economy like you indicated. It was completely agrarian. Nothing in today's USA was built on the backs of slaves. Nothing.Vegas » 16 Feb 2023, 9:24 am » wrote: ↑ You need to research before you make these claims. They were not completely nuked. If they were, then everyone would have migrated to the North. Yes, their economy was ruined. However, many former slaves, like half, stayed with their former masters to continue to work 9inj the fields. They were just paid...very little, but still paid.