the 65 project
By slideman
16 Feb 2023 11:08 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
16 Feb 2023 11:08 am
In March 2022, the 65 Project launched by filing ethics complaints against 10 lawyers who worked on lawsuits to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election in favor of Trump. The group seeks to disbar 111 lawyers from 26 states in total. The targeted lawyers include President Trump’s legal advisors such as Sidney Powell and Jenna Ellis, lawyers who were purported “alternate electors” for Trump, and attorneys who allegedly supported the January 6, 2021 storming of the U.S. Capitol. [6]
https://www.influencewatch.org/organization/65-project/
I hope they manage to disbar all 111 of them. Now That's what I call cancel culture!
https://www.influencewatch.org/organization/65-project/
I hope they manage to disbar all 111 of them. Now That's what I call cancel culture!
16 Feb 2023 11:09 am
16 Feb 2023 11:10 am
Nice tryZ09 » 16 Feb 2023, 12:10 pm » wrote: ↑ So now you want to disbar lawyers that worked for Trump?
How about the 51 "experts" that said Hunter's laptop wasn't real...?
What should we do with them?
16 Feb 2023 11:12 am
You know...when Trump dies, liberals are going to have A LOT of free time on their hands. I suspect many will need counseling and a 12 step program.
16 Feb 2023 11:13 am
slideman
In March 2022, the 65 Project launched by filing ethics complaints against 10 lawyers who worked on lawsuits to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election in favor of Trump. The group seeks to disbar 111 lawyers from 26 states in total. The targeted lawyers include President Trump’s legal advisors such as Sidney Powell and Jenna Ellis, lawyers who were purported “alternate electors” for Trump, and attorneys who allegedly supported the January 6, 2021 storming of the U.S. Capitol. [6]
I hope they manage to disbar all 111 of them. Now That's what I call cancel culture!
You **** really want a war?
16 Feb 2023 11:16 am
16 Feb 2023 11:19 am
In March 2022, the 65 Project launched by filing ethics complaints against 10 lawyers who worked on lawsuits to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election in favor of Trump. The group seeks to disbar 111 lawyers from 26 states in total. The targeted lawyers include President Trump’s legal advisors such as Sidney Powell and Jenna Ellis, lawyers who were purported “alternate electors” for Trump, and attorneys who allegedly supported the January 6, 2021 storming of the U.S. Capitol. [6]The group will air ads in Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin, all battleground states. The 65 Project will also encourage the American Bar Association to codify rules banning frivolous attempts to overturn elections. [7]The 65 Project expressed plans to spend $2.5 million on its campaign in its first year. [8]slideman » 16 Feb 2023, 12:08 pm » wrote: ↑ In March 2022, the 65 Project launched by filing ethics complaints against 10 lawyers who worked on lawsuits to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election in favor of Trump. The group seeks to disbar 111 lawyers from 26 states in total. The targeted lawyers include President Trump’s legal advisors such as Sidney Powell and Jenna Ellis, lawyers who were purported “alternate electors” for Trump, and attorneys who allegedly supported the January 6, 2021 storming of the U.S. Capitol. [6]
https://www.influencewatch.org/organization/65-project/
I hope they manage to disbar all 111 of them. Now That's what I call cancel culture!
whose dark money is funding this .....?
considering ....
The 65 Project was “devised” by Democratic consultant and former Clinton administration official Melissa Moss. It is a project of Law Works, a group with no website or public financial disclosures. [1] The name “65 Project” refers to the number of lawsuits filed by supporters of President Donald Trump to overturn the 2020 presidential election. [2]
16 Feb 2023 11:26 am
You seem a little confused as to what dark money is. Funding of a private entity that has nothing to do with an election is not dark money.Majik » 16 Feb 2023, 12:19 pm » wrote: ↑ In March 2022, the 65 Project launched by filing ethics complaints against 10 lawyers who worked on lawsuits to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election in favor of Trump. The group seeks to disbar 111 lawyers from 26 states in total. The targeted lawyers include President Trump’s legal advisors such as Sidney Powell and Jenna Ellis, lawyers who were purported “alternate electors” for Trump, and attorneys who allegedly supported the January 6, 2021 storming of the U.S. Capitol. [6]The group will air ads in Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin, all battleground states. The 65 Project will also encourage the American Bar Association to codify rules banning frivolous attempts to overturn elections. [7]The 65 Project expressed plans to spend $2.5 million on its campaign in its first year. [8]
whose dark money is funding this .....?
considering ....
The 65 Project was “devised” by Democratic consultant and former Clinton administration official Melissa Moss. It is a project of Law Works, a group with no website or public financial disclosures. [1] The name “65 Project” refers to the number of lawsuits filed by supporters of President Donald Trump to overturn the 2020 presidential election. [2]
If you're going to be effective you're going to have to study American government and Mores; your Russian Masters are not going to be happy.
16 Feb 2023 11:29 am
The 65 project is funded by concerned citizens like me; in addition many of the lawyers who work for the 65 project work pro bono
16 Feb 2023 11:36 am
Why do you try to change the subjectZ09 » 16 Feb 2023, 12:31 pm » wrote: ↑ You're a concerned citizen?
Why don't you care about the millions crossing the border?
You are the most intellectually dishonest person I have ever encountered
16 Feb 2023 11:37 am
The money spent here comes really close to being dark money. It could be argued, that one of the ulterior motives of the group is to keep adverse stories related to Trump in the news. That would certainly fall under "efforts to influence elections"...while technically it isn't dark money (yet), it is a distinction without a difference.slideman » 16 Feb 2023, 12:26 pm » wrote: ↑ You seem a little confused as to what dark money is. Funding of a private entity that has nothing to do with an election is not dark money.
16 Feb 2023 11:38 am
He's only "a concerned citizen" if he likes the law in question. If he disagrees with, or dislikes, the law...not so much.Z09 » 16 Feb 2023, 12:31 pm » wrote: ↑ You're a concerned citizen?
Why don't you care about the millions crossing the border?
16 Feb 2023 11:40 am
That seems quite a stretch to meConsRule » 16 Feb 2023, 12:37 pm » wrote: ↑ The money spent here comes really close to being dark money. It could be argued, that one of the ulterior motives of the group is to keep adverse stories related to Trump in the news. That would certainly fall under "efforts to influence elections"...while technically it isn't dark money (yet), it is a distinction without a difference
16 Feb 2023 11:40 am
Dark money yet you have no problem with the millions of dollars that go to the heritage foundation and CPAC.
Can you say hypocrite
Can you say hypocrite
16 Feb 2023 11:47 am
slideman » 16 Feb 2023, 12:08 pm » wrote: ↑ In March 2022, the 65 Project launched by filing ethics complaints against 10 lawyers who worked on lawsuits to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election in favor of Trump. The group seeks to disbar 111 lawyers from 26 states in total. The targeted lawyers include President Trump’s legal advisors such as Sidney Powell and Jenna Ellis, lawyers who were purported “alternate electors” for Trump, and attorneys who allegedly supported the January 6, 2021 storming of the U.S. Capitol. [6]
https://www.influencewatch.org/organization/65-project/
I hope they manage to disbar all 111 of them. Now That's what I call cancel culture!
I doubt anyone supported storming the capital building though a few plants encouraged it.
16 Feb 2023 11:48 am
But you're an idiot...so there's that
16 Feb 2023 11:50 am
What you say is the opposite of the facts go awayGoodgrief » 16 Feb 2023, 12:47 pm » wrote: ↑ I doubt anyone supported storming the capital building though a few plants encouraged it.
16 Feb 2023 11:51 am
I'm an idiot yet you conservatives seem to regularly lose the argument; isn't that amazing
16 Feb 2023 11:54 am
Yes, little girl. We all know that cancel culture makes your ****** twitch.slideman » 16 Feb 2023, 12:08 pm » wrote: ↑ In March 2022, the 65 Project launched by filing ethics complaints against 10 lawyers who worked on lawsuits to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election in favor of Trump. The group seeks to disbar 111 lawyers from 26 states in total. The targeted lawyers include President Trump’s legal advisors such as Sidney Powell and Jenna Ellis, lawyers who were purported “alternate electors” for Trump, and attorneys who allegedly supported the January 6, 2021 storming of the U.S. Capitol. [6]
https://www.influencewatch.org/organization/65-project/
I hope they manage to disbar all 111 of them. Now That's what I call cancel culture!
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
16 Feb 2023 11:54 am
Of course it is, fruity. Cancel culture is in the blood of authoritarian cultists.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
Who is online
In total there are 3537 users online :: 9 registered, 16 bots, and 3512 guests
Registered users: Johnny You, *Roshambo, Blackvegetable, RebelGator, Beekeeper, Fat Checker, SouthernFried, nefarious101, PoliticalPopUp
Bots: okhttp, Custo, YandexBot, DuckDuckBot, Bolt, CriteoBot, ADmantX, Nutch, Applebot, proximic, facebookexternalhit, Googlebot, Mediapartners-Google, curl/7, Baiduspider, bingbot