Your articles are a dime a dozen being pumped out by your propaganda machine .....slideman » 16 Feb 2023, 2:41 pm » wrote: ↑ But here's an article about some lawyers who represented Trump who aren't going to lose their law licenses because they refuse to lie in court.
Trump Cries Voter Fraud. In Court, His Lawyers Don’t.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/trump-crie ... 1605271267
The Trump campaign or Republican allies have brought lawsuits in several battleground states contesting election results that favored President-elect Joe Biden, seeking to stop the certification of results or have ballots thrown out. Under questioning from judges handling the cases, at least two of Mr. Trump’s lawyers have backed away from suggestions that the election was stolen or fraudulent.
Court system protects reasonable doubt, when that gets debunked, all legal precedences supporting reasonable doubt are what? Null and void.slideman » 16 Feb 2023, 2:41 pm » wrote: ↑ But here's an article about some lawyers who represented Trump who aren't going to lose their law licenses because they refuse to lie in court.
Trump Cries Voter Fraud. In Court, His Lawyers Don’t.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/trump-crie ... 1605271267
The Trump campaign or Republican allies have brought lawsuits in several battleground states contesting election results that favored President-elect Joe Biden, seeking to stop the certification of results or have ballots thrown out. Under questioning from judges handling the cases, at least two of Mr. Trump’s lawyers have backed away from suggestions that the election was stolen or fraudulent.
Bingo!RedheadedStranger » 16 Feb 2023, 2:08 pm » wrote: ↑ What the 65 Project is trying to do is change the rules that will prevent anyone from questioning any election moving forward, ever.
That's what this is about.
You will sit down, shut up, and accept the outcomes without question.
Sounds pretty "democratic" doesn't it.
https://news.bloomberglaw.com/business- ... -bar-rules
Tom Fitton, president of the conservative group Judicial Watch, called the Project 65 effort a “political attack on those who are on the wrong side of litigation in a political dispute.” George Washington University Law School Professor Jonathan Turley said the effort could “place the bar on a slippery slope where lawyers addressing novel or new legal theories can be stripped of their licenses.”
I may seem to say the same things over and over again because those things happen to be true.
slideman
I may seem to say the same things over and over again because those things happen to be true.
Unlike you folks on the other side I don't have to memorize a lot of **** so I can keep my story somewhat consistent
Simple facts
Ya you show off your TDS daily.
Simple facts are established by reasonable doubt,slideman » 16 Feb 2023, 2:49 pm » wrote: ↑ I may seem to say the same things over and over again because those things happen to be true.
Unlike you folks on the other side I don't have to memorize a lot of **** so I can keep my story somewhat consistent
Simple facts
You think the Wall Street journal is a part of the left-wing propaganda machine?Majik » 16 Feb 2023, 2:46 pm » wrote: ↑ Your articles are a dime a dozen being pumped out by your propaganda machine .....
They mean literally nothing in the real world .....snowflake.
We have more guns and already know that at least 30% of you idiots would not fight at all .....slideman » 16 Feb 2023, 2:02 pm » wrote: ↑ Lol
There are more Democrats than Republicans in America.
Absolutely.slideman » 16 Feb 2023, 2:52 pm » wrote: ↑ You think the Wall Street journal is a part of the left-wing propaganda machine?
You're going to have to do better than that Boris your Masters are not going to be pleased
Are you advocating civil war?Majik » 16 Feb 2023, 2:53 pm » wrote: ↑ We have more guns and already know that at least 30% of you idiots would not fight at all .....
We keep pushing by insisting on the truth rather than the nonsense you people spout
No, The Dem propaganda machine .....slideman » 16 Feb 2023, 2:52 pm » wrote: ↑ You think the Wall Street journal is a part of the left-wing propaganda machine?
You're going to have to do better than that Boris your Masters are not going to be pleased
No, you and your ilk are and you may just get what you are pushing for ....
I won't have too, you prepared for your reality to fade away like it never existed in real time without deniers dying to support it historically here. Your martyrdom is in vain because you only exist with past characteristics flowing through your veins.slideman » 16 Feb 2023, 2:58 pm » wrote: ↑ The last tranche of idiot Republicans who thought violence was an answer are looking at the insides of federal penitentiaries about now
Would you care to join them?
Except that is a flat lie and you know it all the talk of civil war is coming from the right.Majik » 16 Feb 2023, 3:00 pm » wrote: ↑ No, you and your ilk are and you may just get what you are pushing for ....
An actual civil war, people simply change their minds. That ballots over bullets style of honest compromising not done in this country for over a century. End reasonable doubt and why mind deniers loathing the skin they exist in anymore.slideman » 16 Feb 2023, 3:02 pm » wrote: ↑ Except that is a flat lie and you know it all the talk of civil war is coming from the right.
Would you like their number .....oh ,I forgot you have it on speed dial ....slideman » 16 Feb 2023, 2:58 pm » wrote: ↑ The last tranche of idiot Republicans who thought violence was an answer are looking at the insides of federal penitentiaries about now
Would you care to join them?
slideman » 16 Feb 2023, 2:56 pm » wrote: ↑ We keep pushing by insisting on the truth rather than the nonsense you people spout
Your response to the cognitive dissonance is violence?
We have cops for that