ScottMon » 17 Feb 2023, 7:49 am » wrote: ↑ Trump produced 25% of our current deficit Funny how that only counts when a Democrat is in the Whitehouse. You guys were sure mad when Obama didn't stop the deficit from ramping up.
Xavier_Onassis » 17 Feb 2023, 9:14 am » wrote: ↑ This balloon was YUGE and clearly not any sort of school project.
None of you RWNJ saps knows anything about balloons or shooting them down.
Shooting it down over Alaska would have made retrieving it nearly impossible in cold and deep waters.
Shooting it down over land could have harmed someone or a lot of property.
It made good sense for Biden to follow the advice of the military.
dildo_swaggins » 17 Feb 2023, 11:41 am » wrote: ↑ If he didn't blow up the balloon he's an asshole if he does blow it up he's an asshole. You are just a bunch of unhappy partisan ***.wipes
ScottMon » 17 Feb 2023, 7:49 am » wrote: ↑ Trump produced 25% of our current deficit Funny how that only counts when a Democrat is in the Whitehouse. You guys were sure mad when Obama didn't stop the deficit from ramping up.
Xavier_Onassis » 17 Feb 2023, 11:52 am » wrote: ↑ To shoot down an object that is at 40,000 feet up in the sky,you need an aircraft that can fly that high, moron.
Your idiot EARNED the title of asshole LONG BEFORE the balloon incidents!dildo_swaggins » 17 Feb 2023, 11:41 am » wrote: ↑ If he didn't blow up the balloon he's an asshole if he does blow it up he's an asshole. You are just a bunch of unhappy partisan ***.wipes
Xavier_Onassis » 17 Feb 2023, 11:52 am » wrote: ↑ To shoot down an object that is at 40,000 feet up in the sky,you need an aircraft that can fly that high, moron.
any gamblers, the middle school gets a multi million dollar grant as an apology. compound the mistake to assure the government goes bankrupt.Warcok » 16 Feb 2023, 7:34 pm » wrote: ↑ Missed the first shot but got it on the second one. $400,000 per missile :die: :die: :rofl:
The balloon that is the subject of this thread was last tracked flying at an altitude of 38,910 ft. and posed a threat to civilian commercial air traffic.PastorBlast » 17 Feb 2023, 12:53 pm » wrote: ↑Interesting question.. What plane did they use to get the Chinese spy balloon? An F-16 has a cieling of 50,000 feet.Xavier_Onassis » 17 Feb 2023, 11:52 am » wrote: ↑ To shoot down an object that is at 40,000 feet up in the sky,you need an aircraft that can fly that high, moron.
Warcok » 16 Feb 2023, 7:34 pm » wrote: ↑ Missed the first shot but got it on the second one. $400,000 per missile![]()
![]()
They're not pointing fingers yet, but you are even before the evidence is in.A small, globe-trotting balloon declared “missing in action” by an Illinois-based hobbyist club on Feb. 15 has emerged as a candidate to explain one of the three mystery objects shot down by four heat-seeking missiles launched by U.S. Air Force fighters since Feb. 10.
The club—the Northern Illinois Bottlecap Balloon Brigade (NIBBB)—is not pointing fingers yet.
https://aviationweek.com/defense-space/ ... -down-usaf
Glad you are so smart you cannot tell the difference from factual plausible deniability and making **** up.Misty » 17 Feb 2023, 1:27 pm » wrote: ↑ The balloon that is the subject of this thread was last tracked flying at an altitude of 38,910 ft. and posed a threat to civilian commercial air traffic.
Xavier_Onassis » 17 Feb 2023, 9:14 am » wrote: ↑ This balloon was YUGE and clearly not any sort of school project.
None of you RWNJ saps knows anything about balloons or shooting them down.
Shooting it down over Alaska would have made retrieving it nearly impossible in cold and deep waters.
Shooting it down over land could have harmed someone or a lot of property.
It made good sense for Biden to follow the advice of the military.
ScottMon » 17 Feb 2023, 7:49 am » wrote: ↑ Trump produced 25% of our current deficit Funny how that only counts when a Democrat is in the Whitehouse. You guys were sure mad when Obama didn't stop the deficit from ramping up.