Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
Where Are The Fiscal Conservatives?
Where Are The Fiscal Conservatives?
By ScottMon
17 Feb 2023 6:53 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
19 Feb 2023 7:30 am
Post some numbers, Rube.FJB » 17 Feb 2023, 8:16 am » wrote: ↑ Democrats have a habit of overspending with all their pork projects... you really need to stop lying shilly.
19 Feb 2023 7:35 am
I am not posting **** for you bv, you never show proof of anything you say. Hell you can't even answer a simple question
19 Feb 2023 7:41 am
Duck,FJB » 19 Feb 2023, 8:35 am » wrote: ↑ I am not posting **** for you bv, you never show proof of anything you say. Hell you can't even answer a simple question
Put a tampon in it.
19 Feb 2023 7:43 am
bv eat **** and die
19 Feb 2023 7:46 am
I give back what these **** libtards throw. Piss off you **** RINOTrumprules » 19 Feb 2023, 8:43 am » wrote: ↑ You cant back your *** up. You think that makes our party look better. You running around spouting off and not providing anything. You are a disgrace to the party.
I am not a Republican bitch like you.
20 Feb 2023 4:02 pm
ScottMon » 19 Feb 2023, 7:52 am » wrote: ↑ Never mentioned surplus. Clinton aggressively cut the budget. That is documented fact.
You mentioned it in your first post!
[https://i.imgflip.com/9z0a87.jpg][/img]
20 Feb 2023 4:08 pm
Trumprules » 19 Feb 2023, 8:43 am » wrote: ↑ You cant back your *** up. You think that makes our party look better. You running around spouting off and not providing anything. You are a disgrace to the party.
Now *** is playing a Republican!
[https://i.imgflip.com/9z0a87.jpg][/img]
20 Feb 2023 4:58 pm
wasn't that back when home mortgages were 9% and above. tht was when credit cards were 28 to 30% started. How long were dems in charge of both houses for over 4 decades.Cannonpointer » 18 Feb 2023, 7:41 pm » wrote: ↑ Thank you for acknowledging that.
Carter grew the economy in the four years of HIS budget 78,79, 80 and 81 (he took office in 77, but that was ford's year - and a good one) faster than reagan did in his eight years 81-89. If anyone wants to swap years (pretend 77 was Carter's, even though the fiscal year runs from October to October) that's fine, too. Either way, Carter ROMPS on Reagan - I just want to be accurate.
http://useconomy.about.com/od/GDP-by-Ye ... istory.htm
In 4 years, carter grew the economy to 154% of where he took over. It was 2.086 trillion in 77 when he took office, and 3.211 trillion for 81 - his last fiscal budget. The numbers are even better if you run it by election year rather than fiscal year.
In his 8 years, Reagan took the economy from 3.211 trillion - Carter's last fiscal year - to 5,6577 trillion in 1989 - his last fiscal year, That's an increase to 177% of what it was when he took over - in EIGHT years. Carter almost made that figure in FOUR years.
Aided and abbetted by a willing conservative (at that time) MSM, republicans have floated a false narrative about Carter and Reagan, playing the former as befuddled and incompetent and the latter as an economic goliath. Nothing could be farther from the truth.
CARTER WAS BETTER FOR THE ECONOMY THAN REAGAN. SO WAS CLINTON - BETTER THAN REAGAN, BUSH AND BUSH.
Let's see what Forbes has to say: http://www.forbes.com/sites/mikepatton/ ... -creation/
Carter's economy produced 10 million jobs in four years, against 16 million in 8 years in Reagan's economy. That's a win for Carter on jobs.
Just WAIT until I show you what Carter did to government (Spoiler alert - he shrunk it) compared to what Reagan did to government (spoiler alert - he BALLOONED it. Biden considered shooting it down).
Who is online
In total there are 7492 users online :: 8 registered, 14 bots, and 7470 guests
Bots: Bolt, CensysInspect, CriteoBot, Googlebot, okhttp, YandexBot, proximic, ADmantX, Mediapartners-Google, Applebot, curl/7, facebookexternalhit, bingbot, Baiduspider