Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
When considering Presidents Day, which two do you have the most, and the least respect for?
When considering Presidents Day, which two do you have the most, and the least respect for?
By DeplorablePatriot
17 Feb 2023 2:03 pm in No Holds Barred Political Forum
17 Feb 2023 10:47 pm
I worked for a couple of years in North Dakota, on and off res. The only reason white folks ever go to the res if for oil. Never to party. Never to gamble. The res is a **** hole. White folks stay away.DeplorablePatriot » 17 Feb 2023, 11:42 pm » wrote: ↑ **** off and stop lying, Tonto.
Liberal "statistics" will show that non-native men commit most of the murders to native women on the reservation. Those are total ****. I know LEOs who work very near MT reservations and know that this is not the case by any means.
Here is non-biased date for you: (American Indian/Alaskan Native)
Results: NVDRS collected data on 2,226 homicides of AI/ANs in 34 states and the District of Columbia during 2003–2018. The age-adjusted AI/AN homicide rate was 8.0 per 100,000 population. The homicide rate was three times higher in AI/AN males than females (12.0 versus 3.9), and the median age of AI/AN victims was 32 years (interquartile range: 23–44 years). Approximately half of AI/AN homicide victims lived or were killed in metropolitan areas (48.2% and 52.7%, respectively). A firearm was used in nearly half (48.4%) of homicides and in a higher percentage of homicides of AI/AN males than females (51.5% versus 39.1%). More AI/AN females than males were killed in a house or apartment (61.8% versus 53.7%) or in their own home (47.7% versus 29.0%). Suspects were identified in 82.8% of AI/AN homicides. Most suspects were male (80.1%), and nearly one third (32.1%) of suspects were AI/ANs. For AI/AN male victims, the suspect was most often an acquaintance or friend (26.3%), a person known to the victim but the exact nature of the relationship was unclear (12.3%), or a relative (excluding intimate partners) (10.5%). For AI/AN female victims, the suspect was most often a current or former intimate partner (38.4%), an acquaintance or friend (11.5%), or a person known to the victim but the exact nature of the relationship was unclear (7.9%). A crime precipitated 24.6% of AI/AN homicides (i.e., the homicide occurred as the result of another serious crime). More AI/AN males were victims of homicides due to an argument or conflict than females (54.7% versus 37.3%), whereas more AI/AN females were victims of homicides due to IPV than males (45.0% versus 12.1%). For homicides related to IPV, 87.2% of AI/AN female victims were killed by a current or former intimate partner, whereas approximately half (51.5%) of AI/AN male victims were corollary victims (i.e., victims killed during an IPV-related incident who were not the intimate partners themselves).
Read it and weep or tell your tribe to get off the drugs and booze.
Likewise, I lived around reservations for several years in western washington state. Same story. The res is a toilet. Any crimes happening there are committed by natives.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
17 Feb 2023 10:58 pm
jerrab » 17 Feb 2023, 8:52 pm » wrote: ↑ think again,. the indians treat their woman with much respect.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Getting natives not to rape their **** DAUGHTER is a pipe dream.
In north dakota, when they get federam money or tribal money - from time to time they get big cash infusions, and the rest of the time they live in drunken squalor on food stamps, - they will buy a semi truck to make big money in the oil patch. But then they will end up sleeping in it, because they can't stay sober and keep their license. The res is a crime pit and a toilet.
You can romantacize the natives all you like, fruitcake. They were stone age savages when we came upon them, offering literally MAGIC, from their perspective. Google, "Columbian Exchange" for a bit of enlightenment. Even though they were extremey primitive compared to us, we took IMMEASURABLE wealth from the natives - potatoes, corn, tobacco. We got a great deal of philosophy and government and wildcraft and wood lore - all of which we managed to digest into our culture in a manner that strengthened, rather than threatened it. We took so many wonderful things from them because we had a culture destined to succeed - a culture competent to shake out the best and leave the rest. What did THEY take? Alchoholism. The horse - which they used to war against each other. Any fire arms they could get their hands on.
And they remain savages to this day, on their reservations. The few who can manage to comport in decent society get the **** off the res, tout de suite.
Marketing materials are one thing, fruity - life experience is another.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
17 Feb 2023 10:59 pm
DeplorablePatriot » 17 Feb 2023, 11:42 pm » wrote: ↑ **** off and stop lying, Tonto.
Liberal "statistics" will show that non-native men commit most of the murders to native women on the reservation. Those are total ****. I know LEOs who work very near MT reservations and know that this is not the case by any means.
Here is non-biased date for you: (American Indian/Alaskan Native)
Results: NVDRS collected data on 2,226 homicides of AI/ANs in 34 states and the District of Columbia during 2003–2018. The age-adjusted AI/AN homicide rate was 8.0 per 100,000 population. The homicide rate was three times higher in AI/AN males than females (12.0 versus 3.9), and the median age of AI/AN victims was 32 years (interquartile range: 23–44 years). Approximately half of AI/AN homicide victims lived or were killed in metropolitan areas (48.2% and 52.7%, respectively). A firearm was used in nearly half (48.4%) of homicides and in a higher percentage of homicides of AI/AN males than females (51.5% versus 39.1%). More AI/AN females than males were killed in a house or apartment (61.8% versus 53.7%) or in their own home (47.7% versus 29.0%). Suspects were identified in 82.8% of AI/AN homicides. Most suspects were male (80.1%), and nearly one third (32.1%) of suspects were AI/ANs. For AI/AN male victims, the suspect was most often an acquaintance or friend (26.3%), a person known to the victim but the exact nature of the relationship was unclear (12.3%), or a relative (excluding intimate partners) (10.5%). For AI/AN female victims, the suspect was most often a current or former intimate partner (38.4%), an acquaintance or friend (11.5%), or a person known to the victim but the exact nature of the relationship was unclear (7.9%). A crime precipitated 24.6% of AI/AN homicides (i.e., the homicide occurred as the result of another serious crime). More AI/AN males were victims of homicides due to an argument or conflict than females (54.7% versus 37.3%), whereas more AI/AN females were victims of homicides due to IPV than males (45.0% versus 12.1%). For homicides related to IPV, 87.2% of AI/AN female victims were killed by a current or former intimate partner, whereas approximately half (51.5%) of AI/AN male victims were corollary victims (i.e., victims killed during an IPV-related incident who were not the intimate partners themselves).
Read it and weep or tell your tribe to get off the drugs and booze.
like I said one word of white men killing native women. white men kill mostly white women,
17 Feb 2023 11:21 pm
the ones in virginia are doing just fine. they were not screwed like the plains indians and **** over on the trail of tears. the ones in virginia stayed on their homelands and allowed to keep their culture and speak their language.DeplorablePatriot » 17 Feb 2023, 11:42 pm » wrote: ↑ **** off and stop lying, Tonto.
Liberal "statistics" will show that non-native men commit most of the murders to native women on the reservation. Those are total ****. I know LEOs who work very near MT reservations and know that this is not the case by any means.
Here is non-biased date for you: (American Indian/Alaskan Native)
Results: NVDRS collected data on 2,226 homicides of AI/ANs in 34 states and the District of Columbia during 2003–2018. The age-adjusted AI/AN homicide rate was 8.0 per 100,000 population. The homicide rate was three times higher in AI/AN males than females (12.0 versus 3.9), and the median age of AI/AN victims was 32 years (interquartile range: 23–44 years). Approximately half of AI/AN homicide victims lived or were killed in metropolitan areas (48.2% and 52.7%, respectively). A firearm was used in nearly half (48.4%) of homicides and in a higher percentage of homicides of AI/AN males than females (51.5% versus 39.1%). More AI/AN females than males were killed in a house or apartment (61.8% versus 53.7%) or in their own home (47.7% versus 29.0%). Suspects were identified in 82.8% of AI/AN homicides. Most suspects were male (80.1%), and nearly one third (32.1%) of suspects were AI/ANs. For AI/AN male victims, the suspect was most often an acquaintance or friend (26.3%), a person known to the victim but the exact nature of the relationship was unclear (12.3%), or a relative (excluding intimate partners) (10.5%). For AI/AN female victims, the suspect was most often a current or former intimate partner (38.4%), an acquaintance or friend (11.5%), or a person known to the victim but the exact nature of the relationship was unclear (7.9%). A crime precipitated 24.6% of AI/AN homicides (i.e., the homicide occurred as the result of another serious crime). More AI/AN males were victims of homicides due to an argument or conflict than females (54.7% versus 37.3%), whereas more AI/AN females were victims of homicides due to IPV than males (45.0% versus 12.1%). For homicides related to IPV, 87.2% of AI/AN female victims were killed by a current or former intimate partner, whereas approximately half (51.5%) of AI/AN male victims were corollary victims (i.e., victims killed during an IPV-related incident who were not the intimate partners themselves).
Read it and weep or tell your tribe to get off the drugs and booze.
17 Feb 2023 11:51 pm
Well, fruitcake, you took injuns out of the equation:jerrab » 17 Feb 2023, 11:59 pm » wrote: ↑ like I said one word of white men killing native women. white men kill mostly white women,
So, what ARE ya saying? Is it meskins, or ***, that are doin' fer the squaws?jerrab » 17 Feb 2023, 8:52 pm » wrote: ↑ think again,. the indians treat their woman with much respect.
How ya like that corner you've painted yourself into, nutjobber?
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
18 Feb 2023 8:35 am
But look a the damage you keep adding by enabling reasonable doubt.Lincoln Nebraska » 17 Feb 2023, 6:08 pm » wrote: ↑ Harrison was da best. He died before he had a chance to do real damage. :mrgreen:
18 Feb 2023 9:44 am
"THIS" was their land first? ****. A handful of Indians did not occupy all of America when the Europeans arrived. The Europeans did not come here running the Indians off the land which they claimed for their villages. It was mostly, more than 99% a vast wilderness.jerrab » 17 Feb 2023, 5:22 pm » wrote: ↑ funny you should say that when this was their land first. they were protecting their home.
18 Feb 2023 9:48 am
Some of what Regan did was good. Other things were bad. Every bit as bad as Mitt Romney would have done. In fact, he really wasn't that much different than Mitt Romney. He just appeared "conservative" after that idiot Jimmy "55 MPH" Carter.DeplorablePatriot » 17 Feb 2023, 6:06 pm » wrote: ↑ I had a hard time leaving old TR out of the two. I liked Reagan because he brought the people together and didn't take any ****.
18 Feb 2023 9:50 am
Regardless, they never occupied more than 1% of the land in America. The woke idiots here forget that nearly all of it was a vast wilderness. 99% of it simply wasn't "theirs".DeplorablePatriot » 17 Feb 2023, 6:16 pm » wrote: ↑ The Indians were backward savages, truly...and they cannot run their lives well even today.
18 Feb 2023 10:44 am
Skans » 18 Feb 2023, 10:44 am » wrote: ↑ "THIS" was their land first? ****. A handful of Indians did not occupy all of America when the Europeans arrived. The Europeans did not come here running the Indians off the land which they claimed for their villages. It was mostly, more than 99% a vast wilderness.
and the white man eventually wanted every single inch of it, every river, every mountain, every stream from sea to shining sea.
18 Feb 2023 10:47 am
there was no good tobacco in america.Cannonpointer » 17 Feb 2023, 11:58 pm » wrote: ↑
Getting natives not to rape their **** DAUGHTER is a pipe dream.
In north dakota, when they get federam money or tribal money - from time to time they get big cash infusions, and the rest of the time they live in drunken squalor on food stamps, - they will buy a semi truck to make big money in the oil patch. But then they will end up sleeping in it, because they can't stay sober and keep their license. The res is a crime pit and a toilet.
You can romantacize the natives all you like, fruitcake. They were stone age savages when we came upon them, offering literally MAGIC, from their perspective. Google, "Columbian Exchange" for a bit of enlightenment. Even though they were extremey primitive compared to us, we took IMMEASURABLE wealth from the natives - potatoes, corn, tobacco. We got a great deal of philosophy and government and wildcraft and wood lore - all of which we managed to digest into our culture in a manner that strengthened, rather than threatened it. We took so many wonderful things from them because we had a culture destined to succeed - a culture competent to shake out the best and leave the rest. What did THEY take? Alchoholism. The horse - which they used to war against each other. Any fire arms they could get their hands on.
And they remain savages to this day, on their reservations. The few who can manage to comport in decent society get the **** off the res, tout de suite.
Marketing materials are one thing, fruity - life experience is another.
18 Feb 2023 10:53 am
Most native Americans understood a person doesn't own land, land supports those living on it. Not bad for 3rd world savages. Second, native americans had their own style of feudalism as did any other geographical area or the Mayans wouldn't have destroyed themselves after creating their calendar no other society matched its accuracy.Skans » 18 Feb 2023, 10:44 am » wrote: ↑ "THIS" was their land first? ****. A handful of Indians did not occupy all of America when the Europeans arrived. The Europeans did not come here running the Indians off the land which they claimed for their villages. It was mostly, more than 99% a vast wilderness.
so what was the common denominator to the numerating population never same reproduction twice? it is really instinctively obvious.
18 Feb 2023 10:57 am
Product of social engineering. Intellectually the result by a species playing pretend cradle to grave.Cannonpointer » 17 Feb 2023, 11:47 pm » wrote: ↑ I worked for a couple of years in North Dakota, on and off res. The only reason white folks ever go to the res if for oil. Never to party. Never to gamble. The res is a **** hole. White folks stay away.
Likewise, I lived around reservations for several years in western washington state. Same story. The res is a toilet. Any crimes happening there are committed by natives.
18 Feb 2023 11:03 am
Yeah well, no one's perfect.jerrab » 18 Feb 2023, 11:44 am » wrote: ↑ and the white man eventually wanted every single inch of it, every river, every mountain, every stream from sea to shining sea.
18 Feb 2023 11:05 am
Well, they understood wrong, didn't they! Because that kind of faulty thinking caused them to lose their land. Stupidity has consequences, Omh!Nostradamus'omh » 18 Feb 2023, 11:53 am » wrote: ↑ Most native Americans understood a person doesn't own land, land supports those living on it. Not bad for 3rd world savages. Second, native americans had their own style of feudalism as did any other geographical area or the Mayans wouldn't have destroyed themselves after creating their calendar no other society matched its accuracy.
so what was the common denominator to the numerating population never same reproduction twice? it is really instinctively obvious.
18 Feb 2023 11:09 am
No, they fell prey to their own ideas life cannot be navigated by one's personal brain adapting to space limited to timed apart now. You choose to follow that mentality rather than risk being one of a kind on your own.Skans » 18 Feb 2023, 12:05 pm » wrote: ↑ Well, they understood wrong, didn't they! Because that kind of faulty thinking caused them to lose their land. Stupidity has consequences, Omh!
Human rights exist when the majorty silence and remove anyone that can explain kinetic displacement in real time.
18 Feb 2023 12:11 pm
He certainly got a thumb's up from me when he launched that missile into Omar Ghaddafi's home. Made in instant point. Killed his son....oh well.Skans » 18 Feb 2023, 10:48 am » wrote: ↑ Some of what Regan did was good. Other things were bad. Every bit as bad as Mitt Romney would have done. In fact, he really wasn't that much different than Mitt Romney. He just appeared "conservative" after that idiot Jimmy "55 MPH" Carter.
18 Feb 2023 1:10 pm
You may confused about the definition of a woman, but there's no doubt this is a definition of a moron.Trumprules » 18 Feb 2023, 6:58 am » wrote: ↑ Nixon and Trump are my least favorite .
Obama and clinton are my favorite.
18 Feb 2023 2:56 pm
RebelGator » 18 Feb 2023, 2:10 pm » wrote: ↑ You may confused about the definition of a woman, but there's no doubt this is a definition of a moron.
Obama, the President who divided a country. How stupid can you be?
18 Feb 2023 4:36 pm
A company I worked for processed and presented tuition grants to some of the qualified injun teens for college use. I’d go the reservation to hand out the grants, the houses all had abandoned cars, the homes smelled cat urine, chickens running around inside. Assorted feces was everywhere including human ****. Just pigs, parents would be passed out laying in their own ****. Teenage daughters pregnant and high, to make it worse the dirty injun teens never used the grants to continue their education. Most of them ended up working at smoked filled casino changing out used tampon dispensers.DeplorablePatriot » 17 Feb 2023, 11:42 pm » wrote: ↑ **** off and stop lying, Tonto.
Liberal "statistics" will show that non-native men commit most of the murders to native women on the reservation. Those are total ****. I know LEOs who work very near MT reservations and know that this is not the case by any means.
Here is non-biased data for you: (American Indian/Alaskan Native)
Results: NVDRS collected data on 2,226 homicides of AI/ANs in 34 states and the District of Columbia during 2003–2018. The age-adjusted AI/AN homicide rate was 8.0 per 100,000 population. The homicide rate was three times higher in AI/AN males than females (12.0 versus 3.9), and the median age of AI/AN victims was 32 years (interquartile range: 23–44 years). Approximately half of AI/AN homicide victims lived or were killed in metropolitan areas (48.2% and 52.7%, respectively). A firearm was used in nearly half (48.4%) of homicides and in a higher percentage of homicides of AI/AN males than females (51.5% versus 39.1%). More AI/AN females than males were killed in a house or apartment (61.8% versus 53.7%) or in their own home (47.7% versus 29.0%). Suspects were identified in 82.8% of AI/AN homicides. Most suspects were male (80.1%), and nearly one third (32.1%) of suspects were AI/ANs. For AI/AN male victims, the suspect was most often an acquaintance or friend (26.3%), a person known to the victim but the exact nature of the relationship was unclear (12.3%), or a relative (excluding intimate partners) (10.5%). For AI/AN female victims, the suspect was most often a current or former intimate partner (38.4%), an acquaintance or friend (11.5%), or a person known to the victim but the exact nature of the relationship was unclear (7.9%). A crime precipitated 24.6% of AI/AN homicides (i.e., the homicide occurred as the result of another serious crime). More AI/AN males were victims of homicides due to an argument or conflict than females (54.7% versus 37.3%), whereas more AI/AN females were victims of homicides due to IPV than males (45.0% versus 12.1%). For homicides related to IPV, 87.2% of AI/AN female victims were killed by a current or former intimate partner, whereas approximately half (51.5%) of AI/AN male victims were corollary victims (i.e., victims killed during an IPV-related incident who were not the intimate partners themselves).
Read it and weep or tell your tribe to get off the drugs and booze.
Who is online
In total there are 4917 users online :: 13 registered, 16 bots, and 4888 guests
Registered users: Vegas, Johnny You, *Roshambo, Blackvegetable, Buck Naked, ConservativeWave, Beekeeper, jerra b, LowIQTrash, Cannonpointer, nefarious101, sole, Huey
Bots: Feedfetcher-Google, MicroMessenger, ADmantX, Adsbot, NING, facebookexternalhit, YandexBot, proximic, Applebot, okhttp, curl/7, Googlebot, CriteoBot, Mediapartners-Google, Baiduspider, bingbot