Squatchman » 19 Feb 2023, 3:25 am » wrote: ↑ They all deserve our respect regardless of political party.
It looks like it's a pretty ****,thankless job.
Jimmy Carter did some good things during his time here on this Earth, I won't deny it. However, being President wasn't one of them.
I agree...2nd worse president ever...a great human being and humanitarian tho...Skans » 19 Feb 2023, 10:02 pm » wrote: ↑ Jimmy Carter did some good things during his time here on this Earth, I won't deny it. However, being President wasn't one of them.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom The good things he did was after being slamed in his second election, so his handlers created habitate for humanity to regain popularity while they bashed Reagan for 8 years being a war manger. Then the congress and senate got GHB to break his promise "No new taxes.". and that lead to Clinton getting into office by dividing the vote with Perot being a 3rd party taking all the votes away from GHB.Skans » 19 Feb 2023, 10:02 pm » wrote: ↑ Jimmy Carter did some good things during his time here on this Earth, I won't deny it. However, being President wasn't one of them.
I'm going to say Carter was the 3rd worst president.ROG62 » 19 Feb 2023, 11:48 pm » wrote: ↑ I agree...2nd worse president ever...a great human being and humanitarian tho...
This (part) is an interesting post. I can find nothing about "Carter's Handlers" getting him involved with Habitat for Humanity. However, it was not Carter who invented the organization nor even the idea. He donated his time and his name to the cause. While admirable, it was not something he created.Nostradamus'omh » 20 Feb 2023, 8:05 am » wrote: ↑ The good things he did was after being slamed in his second election, so his handlers created habitate for humanity to regain popularity while they bashed Reagan for 8 years being a war manger. Then the congress and senate got GHB to break his promise "No new taxes.". and that lead to Clinton getting into office by dividing the vote with Perot being a 3rd party taking all the votes away from GHB.
That's a good point...like an abused child, I've erased obummer from my memory...Skans » 20 Feb 2023, 8:52 am » wrote: ↑ I'm going to say Carter was the 3rd worst president.
- Biden - absolute worst of all time - Complete moron who F-s everything up. Lead around by the Communist Easter Bunny.
- Obama - Horrible, **** president who was all about pitting Blacks against Whites. They should re-name him the Segregationist.
- Carter - "Wrong-Way" Carter. Everything he did was just wrong for America.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom Never forget Christianity didn't become an established religion until Rome converted from mythology of many gods to the worship of one time God. Really doesn't matter if it is named by Hebrews of Abraham or Allah in Islam, each have their own messiah be it Moses, Jesus, Mohammad.Skans » 20 Feb 2023, 9:13 am » wrote: ↑ This (part) is an interesting post. I can find nothing about "Carter's Handlers" getting him involved with Habitat for Humanity. However, it was not Carter who invented the organization nor even the idea. He donated his time and his name to the cause. While admirable, it was not something he created.
Now, I cannot find anything about Carter's Handlers getting him involved with it. Yet, I do not necessarily doubt it either - just have no information on this. Regardless, Jimmy and his wife are Christians and their involvement in charitable organizations wasn't just for show.
I happened to attend a speech old-man Jimmy Carter gave - long after his presidency about where he spoke about his involvement in Habitat for Humanity.
The Democrats are good with coming up with a short elevator speech bashing republicans over one thing or another. Regan - senile warmonger. Bush I - they didn't need to do it, Bush I screwed himself. Bush II - made him out to be an idiot. Romney - dog-killer and greedy capitalist.
DeplorablePatriot » 17 Feb 2023, 3:03 pm » wrote: ↑ The most respect: President Theodore Roosevelt and President Ronald Reagan
The least respect: obama and biden
What are your choices?
The respect for the office for certain. The person has to grow into the job as well.Squatchman » 19 Feb 2023, 3:25 am » wrote: ↑ They all deserve our respect regardless of political party.
It looks like it's a pretty ****,thankless job.
how about understanding the ancestral nature of the beast since conceived, performing as a civic minded soul after birth for the sole time they get adapting to the moment here.?.Deezer Shoove » 20 Feb 2023, 9:54 am » wrote: ↑ The respect for the office for certain. The person has to grow into the job as well.
They all should be given at least a chance to become the person we hoped for.
...unless they have been in politics for nearly 50 years and held the office as VP already.
Those "newly elected" should hit the ground running...
We have to have SOME reasonable expectations from their prior experience (should they remember any of it).
Yeah, Hoover, Landon, Willkie and Dewey were all such terrific choices. Without FDR, we would have no Social Security, and it is hard to imagine that Dewey would have backed the Marshall Plan.
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha. FDR didn't develp it alone. He needed people in every institution to work together to implement it. Top down social architecture works inside out of central authority about human behavior cradle to grave among the 5 generation gaps changing ancestral displacements cradle to grave naturlaly here at the same time all the time. Economics is the central authority to mind over matter governance around the world of alternate realities here now within one species intellectually typecast by vernacular tribalisms of race, creed, color, national origin, gender, all the social narratives of who's who within what this species actually is doing here now.Xavier_Onassis » 20 Feb 2023, 7:23 pm » wrote: ↑ Yeah, Hoover, Landon, Willkie and Dewey were all such terrific choices. Without FDR, we would have no Social Security, and it is hard to imagine that Dewey would have backed the Marshall Plan.
Republicans suck. they have sucked at least since Harding.
Eisenhower was the only Republican president that was worth a ****... and he never voted until he voted for himself.
We haven't had social security for over 40 years now. The Democrats raided the fund for other Democrat projects. What we have is a Ponzi-Scheme tax where young people have to pay for the "hope and dream" that legislators in the future will actually pay them some pittance out when they get to be 88.