Americans are not going to move across the country because of politics.Cannonpointer » 20 Feb 2023, 5:30 pm » wrote: ↑ People move. If they want to go red, they load up the sled, and soon enough, they've fled to a better place to lay their head.
You're trying to complicate it. It's blood simple. We draw a line, you pick a side. There'd likely be an equal number of homes for sale.
Xavier_Onassis » 21 Feb 2023, 9:43 am » wrote: ↑ Americans are not going to move across the country because of politics.
There are no states that are even 80% red or blue.
Oh, look. you've answered Misty's falsely premised question. Thanks, Pook.Xavier_Onassis » 21 Feb 2023, 9:43 am » wrote: ↑Americans are not going to move across the country because of politics.Misty » 20 Feb 2023, 4:08 pm » wrote: ↑ I wonder who she thinks will have to pay for people to relocate to the appropriate state.
You don't require 100% red or blue to draw a line and have separate polities. No one is forced to move - though, OVER TIME, it is likely that an orderly cross migration would in fact occur, and you would get the soys, and the men would move hither, fruit basket.
I GUARANTEE 100% that if you play by HIS VERSION of "texas rules," you will find yourself in a near-naked wrestling match clothed only in army boots and underwear, fighting for your virginity - and likely being allowed to win, as he is, at bottom, a bottom.Xavier_Onassis » 21 Feb 2023, 10:30 am » wrote: ↑ You are a phony amateur Texan and have not a thing to do with any Texas rules.
I have no obligation to play by any rules or even to play stupid games such as MTG proposes.
...the republicrat-level retards will just fight about something else in their new communities...that's how republicrat-level retards [and monetary ignoramuses] roll...Cannonpointer » 21 Feb 2023, 11:52 am » wrote: ↑ Oh, look. you've answered Misty's falsely premised question. Thanks, Pook.
You don't require 100% red or blue to draw a line and have separate polities. No one is forced to move - though, OVER TIME, it is likely that an orderly cross migration would in fact occur, and you would get the soys, and the men would move hither, fruit basket.
Gee could that be relative to urban sprawl over populating concrete jungles that cannot supply their own raw materials for the needs of those adopting social mantras cradle to grave saying they have more rights than rural self reliant people willing to work and share what they grow for a fee usually lest than 10% total cost of finished product yet taxed 50% of what they earn feeding people that cannot do it themselves?Xavier_Onassis » 21 Feb 2023, 9:43 am » wrote: ↑ Americans are not going to move across the country because of politics.
There are no states that are even 80% red or blue.
Guarantee? You cannot guarantee diddly-squat.Cannonpointer » 21 Feb 2023, 11:55 am » wrote: ↑ I GUARANTEE 100% that if you play by HIS VERSION of "texas rules," you will find yourself in a near-naked wrestling match clothed only in army boots and underwear, fighting for your virginity - and likely being allowed to win, as he is, at bottom, a bottom.
I can guarrantee now is kinetically eternity by how evolving works in compounding simplicity of genetic results never exceeding mutually timed apart you won't accept as possible.Xavier_Onassis » 21 Feb 2023, 1:04 pm » wrote: ↑ Guarantee? You cannot guarantee diddly-squat.
He is a phony Texan and a very silly and rather ignorant person.
I see no reason to play any game with anyone.
But what about the folks in Houston and Austin who are liberal? You're going to Nuke San Antonio? Or 4 million people can just get up and leave Texas?Taipan » 20 Feb 2023, 10:08 pm » wrote: ↑ Negative.
Freedom of choice.
If I work out of Seattle for 6mos., on a contract...... then I play by their rules.
If a Yankee Dem chooses to live in Dallas,......then he lives by our rules.
Example--
1. Seattle. No guns. OK.
2. Dallas. $50.00 Fine for any White Man who does not have
a firearm in his P/U truck.
I'm just sayin' - his fake "texas rules" will always come down to a game of strip poker between two fellas.Xavier_Onassis » 21 Feb 2023, 1:04 pm » wrote: ↑ Guarantee? You cannot guarantee diddly-squat.
He is a phony Texan and a very silly and rather ignorant person.
I see no reason to play any game with anyone.
slideman » 21 Feb 2023, 1:36 pm » wrote: ↑ But what about the folks in Houston and Austin who are liberal? You're going to Nuke San Antonio? Or 4 million people can just get up and leave Texas?
You are as smart as David Hogg trained to recite what his handlers educated him to believe.Taipan » 21 Feb 2023, 2:03 pm » wrote: ↑ NO, Silly-***.
But,
they must play by our rules.
Example--
1. No more Affirmative Action.
2. Merit will decide the game......but the color of skin is a moot point.
3. The Dems are Pro-Black Bigots......but we are not.
4. And we do not teach Anti-White Racism, like CRT, in our schools.
5. We will be free to fly the Confederate Flag anywhere.
6. And you? You are free to leave Texas anytime you wish.
We are cowboys........not prison wardens.
Our ranch.........our rules.
Your ranch......your rules.
Can ya dig it ? :)
Nostradamus'omh » 21 Feb 2023, 2:08 pm » wrote: ↑ You are as smart as David Hogg trained to recite what his handlers educated him to believe.
not a concern of mine. What he is being used for by the media is.Taipan » 21 Feb 2023, 2:11 pm » wrote: ↑ I will bet that Hogg owns a handgun
today for self-protection.
So you are a fascist you believe in State control and that local school board should not have control of their own curricula?Taipan » 21 Feb 2023, 2:03 pm » wrote: ↑ NO, Silly-***.
But,
they must play by our rules.
Example--
1. No more Affirmative Action.
2. Merit will decide the game......but the color of skin is a moot point.
3. The Dems are Pro-Black Bigots......but we are not.
4. And we do not teach Anti-White Racism, like CRT, in our schools.
5. We will be free to fly the Confederate Flag anywhere.
6. And you? You are free to leave Texas anytime you wish.
We are cowboys........not prison wardens.
Our ranch.........our rules.
Your ranch......your rules.
Can ya dig it ?
Misty » 20 Feb 2023, 4:02 pm » wrote: ↑
Are Republicans prepared to defend a member of the House Homeland Security Committee openly endorsing the dissolution of the United States?
I would bet good money that they are.
I'd pay good money to be able to divorce the 39% of this Nation that supports Democrats.Misty » 20 Feb 2023, 4:02 pm » wrote: ↑
Are Republicans prepared to defend a member of the House Homeland Security Committee openly endorsing the dissolution of the United States?
I would bet good money that they are.