He followed the same "science" you did, to find himself a test subject. He HAS to be calling you out on the gender "science."Skans » 20 Feb 2023, 4:52 pm » wrote: ↑ AGAIN, since you tagged me, what specifically, do you believe I call "science" that is nothing more than scandal-mongering?
Since you had the audacity to call me stupid because you're stupid.....let's examine your first few words.Phelix_Dacat » 20 Feb 2023, 4:29 pm » wrote: ↑ I read books on history and studies that show the stuff the drooling ideologues on this site believe to be science are nothing more than figments of adolescent inferior scandal mongering. But those involve math which leaves out every @Taipan , @Skans , @Cannonpointer .
Every time I hear/see a liberal state that, I'm reminded of the sage words of my Intermediate Accounting professor; "Figures never lie...but liars figure."Misty » 20 Feb 2023, 4:49 pm » wrote: ↑ Check the numbers.
Red states get back more from the federal government than they pay in.
Why don't you tell me which entity breaks it down like that?ConsRule » 20 Feb 2023, 5:03 pm » wrote: ↑Every time I hear/see a liberal state that, I'm reminded of the sage words of my Intermediate Accounting professor; "Figures never lie...but liars figure."Misty » 20 Feb 2023, 4:49 pm » wrote: ↑ Check the numbers.
Red states get back more from the federal government than they pay in.
What is the breakdown between what goes to the state and what goes to the individuals? How much of the money is spent on people who are here illegally? How much is spent on National Parks (which generate nothing for the state and take up space)? How much is spent for military installations (which generate far less return in the economy than civilian payrolls and contribute nothing in property taxes). And that isn't everything.
I've read what the freudians had to say about the castrati fruitcake. It isn't pretty. Butchered males are extremely suicidal. You and your kind consume agenda-driven pseudo-science. Anytime you want to share these enlightening tomes for the edification of the unwashed, fruitcake, I am - in the immortal words of Ross Perot - "all ears."Phelix_Dacat » 20 Feb 2023, 4:29 pm » wrote: ↑ I read books on history and studies that show the stuff the drooling ideologues on this site believe to be science are nothing more than figments of adolescent inferior scandal mongering. But those involve math which leaves out every
I tried to stay on topic and got called an idiot.Misty » 20 Feb 2023, 5:07 pm » wrote: ↑
This was supposed to be a thread about what MTG said and as usual it has gone off on a tangent.
Don't have time to do the research...and much more importantly, don't care enough to do it. I'm smart enough to understand the comment is just an uniformed liberal talking point. I just occasionally like to point out the obvious and see what kind of reaction I get. To date, I have yet to encounter a liberal who also understands that and is honest enough to admit as much.Misty » 20 Feb 2023, 5:08 pm » wrote: ↑ Why don't you tell me which entity breaks it down like that?
Because of your comments. Maybe you should take a supplement that helps with mental focus.Misty » 20 Feb 2023, 5:07 pm » wrote: ↑
This was supposed to be a thread about what MTG said and as usual it has gone off on a tangent.
RG - you don't have to convince the rest of us that @Phelix_Dacat is stupid! He's a moronic bowl of limp, soggy fruitloops.RebelGator » 20 Feb 2023, 5:02 pm » wrote: ↑ Since you had the audacity to call me stupid because you're stupid.....let's examine your first few words.
You said, "I read books on history and studies....."
That pretty much is crystal clear that you read books about history AND studies.....that's poor sentence structuring and leads to confusion that you're reading books about studies, which is a stupid statement.
Your language tutor wasn't Onassis by any chance, was it?
That would explain a lot.
Why don't YOU just keep paying high property taxes to your state while subsidizing our low ones? Did WE complain?Misty » 20 Feb 2023, 5:08 pm » wrote: ↑ Why don't you tell me which entity breaks it down like that?

slideman » 20 Feb 2023, 5:15 pm » wrote: ↑ Georgia? Mississippi? Texas?
Lol
If they want to go let them go.
country is supposed to be based on self-determination after all.
Phelix_Dacat » 20 Feb 2023, 4:11 pm » wrote: ↑ She sounds like @Taipan and a few others.
They, MTG and Taipan and Republicans and MAGAts and etc, are traitors to the country, heart and soul. As the confederates they are descended from. As the confederates my ancestors and my wife's ancestors killed. Deservedly.
More importantly, what's a nice girl like you doing in a place like this? Can I buy you a drink? Care to dance?
You can do better than here. And you should.
Peace be unto you, Misty.
My thought is that if the red states are taker states, that just shows how stupid the blue states are.ConsRule » 20 Feb 2023, 5:17 pm » wrote: ↑ Don't have time to do the research...and much more importantly, don't care enough to do it. I'm smart enough to understand the comment is just an uniformed liberal talking point. I just occasionally like to point out the obvious and see what kind of reaction I get. To date, I have yet to encounter a liberal who also understands that and is honest enough to admit as much.
RebelGator » 20 Feb 2023, 5:21 pm » wrote: ↑ What are your plans for Seattle, make it a suburb of South Africa?
Ouch...Cannonpointer » 20 Feb 2023, 5:19 pm » wrote: ↑ Why don't YOU just keep paying high property taxes to your state while subsidizing our low ones? Did WE complain?
No. We didn't.
And while your giver states slide into child molestation as policy, our taker states will continue sending boys to the boys' room and goils to the goils' room.
One more thought. Could you PLEASE get the blue state police departments to stop murdering innocent black men?
So they'll stop burning your cities?
PLEEEEASE????
ConsRule » 20 Feb 2023, 5:17 pm » wrote: ↑ Don't have time to do the research...and much more importantly, don't care enough to do it. I'm smart enough to understand the comment is just an uniformed liberal talking point. I just occasionally like to point out the obvious and see what kind of reaction I get. To date, I have yet to encounter a liberal who also understands that and is honest enough to admit as much.
I only want to dissolve the 41% of Americans who voted for Biden. But, what should I dissolve them in?Misty » 20 Feb 2023, 4:02 pm » wrote: ↑
Are Republicans prepared to defend a member of the House Homeland Security Committee openly endorsing the dissolution of the United States?
I would bet good money that they are.
slideman » 20 Feb 2023, 5:15 pm » wrote: ↑ Georgia? Mississippi? Texas?
Lol
If they want to go let them go.
country is supposed to be based on self-determination after all.