Liberal Forum

FJB » 22 Feb 2023, 8:31 am » wrote: ↑

22 Feb 2023, 8:31 am

I did answer the stupid talking points that you leftist use all the time.

Some "weapons" were not made for public use. NOTICE HOW I SAID WEAPONS AND NOT ARMS?

DO YOU REALLY WANT A 9 YEAR OLD WALKING AROUND WITH AN AR? 

GET REAL YOU **** RETARD LIBERAL ASSWIPE

Shoulder mounted stingers are arms.  Hell... you can sling them over your shoulder just like an AR-15.
Do I really want a child with an AR-15?  no.  Clearly...neither do you.  Clearly, from YOUR perspective, the right for the people to bear arms is not individual and absolute.  You clearly are fine with there being some form of regulation that will prevent stingers from falling into criminal hands, or assault rifles falling into the hands of children.... or shotguns being purchased by certifiably insane mental patients.... or handguns being purchased by men who have been convicted of assaulting their spouses.  
So don't **** talk to me about how I am the one who wants to take your guns away.... I am for sensible gun regulation.  I don't want anyone taking away guns unless there is a good reason to do so... like mental illness, like a propensity for violence... like maturity.

Gun control is NOT gun confiscation.  You are the **** fear monger here, not me.

FJB » 22 Feb 2023, 8:07 am » wrote: ↑

22 Feb 2023, 8:07 am

Except asshole, the Supreme Court has ruled it is an individual right

The Supreme Court ruled that citizens may keep a handgun at home for self-defense in District of Columbia v. Heller.  It did not rule that  citizens have a right to keep an assault weapon at home.  That is why individual states can legally ban possession of assault or "military style" weapons.

If the Supreme Court was not six-ninths full of **** conjob hypocrites they would do the same thing with gun rights that they did with abortion rights.  They would have written a clear opinion that leaves it up to the individual states.  You "states rights" hypocrite cocksuckers are only interested in States having rights that you want them to have.
 

maineman » 22 Feb 2023, 8:43 am » wrote: ↑

22 Feb 2023, 8:43 am

Shoulder mounted stingers are arms.  Hell... you can sling them over your shoulder just like an AR-15.
Do I really want a child with an AR-15?  no.  Clearly...neither do you.  Clearly, from YOUR perspective, the right for the people to bear arms is not individual and absolute.  You clearly are fine with there being some form of regulation that will prevent stingers from falling into criminal hands, or assault rifles falling into the hands of children.... or shotguns being purchased by certifiably insane mental patients.... or handguns being purchased by men who have been convicted of assaulting their spouses.  
So don't **** talk to me about how I am the one who wants to take your guns away.... I am for sensible gun regulation.  I don't want anyone taking away guns unless there is a good reason to do so... like mental illness, like a propensity for violence... like maturity.

Gun control is NOT gun confiscation.  You are the **** fear monger here, not me.

The problem is the fbi, they are not enforcing existing gun laws. They are more concerned with going after God fearing True Americans.

Look MM, the day you leftist come for our guns, is the day there is no United States of America

maineman » 21 Feb 2023, 6:00 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Feb 2023, 6:00 pm

Unlike you, who, when he finds one idea from any one thinker, feels strangely compelled to agree with each and every other idea that person has ever had or will have?

Yeah... we're definitely different in that regard.

Hey @ConsRule    you sure crawled away from THIS post pretty quick.

lol
 

IkeBana » 22 Feb 2023, 8:45 am » wrote: ↑

22 Feb 2023, 8:45 am

The Supreme Court ruled that citizens may keep a handgun at home for self-defense in District of Columbia v. Heller.  It did not rule that  citizens have a right to keep an assault weapon at home.  That is why individual states can legally ban possession of assault or "military style" weapons.

If the Supreme Court was not six-ninths full of **** conjob hypocrites they would do the same thing with gun rights that they did with abortion rights.  They would have written a clear opinion that leaves it up to the individual states.  You "states rights" hypocrite cocksuckers are only interested in States having rights that you want them to have.

LOL define an assault rifle if you can 

FJB » 22 Feb 2023, 8:46 am » wrote: ↑

22 Feb 2023, 8:46 am

The problem is the fbi, they are not enforcing existing gun laws. They are more concerned with going after God fearing True Americans.

Look MM, the day you leftist come for our guns, is the day there is no United States of America

nice dodge. 

What a ****** you are.

I just handed your *** to you, Mr. Individual and Absolute.  Why not show some real character and admit that wanting universal background checks or red flag laws is NOT gun confiscation but sensible regulation?

maineman » 22 Feb 2023, 8:49 am » wrote: ↑

22 Feb 2023, 8:49 am

nice dodge. 

What a ****** you are.

I just handed your *** to you, Mr. Individual and Absolute.  Why not show some real character and admit that wanting universal background checks or red flag laws is NOT gun confiscation but sensible regulation?

LOL you keep thinking that you unAmerican asswipe

FJB » 22 Feb 2023, 8:46 am » wrote: ↑

22 Feb 2023, 8:46 am

LOL define an assault rifle if you can

you just tap dance all the **** time, don't you?

maineman » 22 Feb 2023, 8:49 am » wrote: ↑

22 Feb 2023, 8:49 am

nice dodge. 

What a ****** you are.

I just handed your *** to you, Mr. Individual and Absolute.  Why not show some real character and admit that wanting universal background checks or red flag laws is NOT gun confiscation but sensible regulation?

funny how you don't address the fbi problem

FJB » 22 Feb 2023, 8:49 am » wrote: ↑

22 Feb 2023, 8:49 am

LOL you keep thinking that you unAmerican asswipe

Is the right to bear arms individual and absolute?  Yes or No?

maineman » 22 Feb 2023, 8:46 am » wrote: ↑

22 Feb 2023, 8:46 am

Hey @ConsRule    you sure crawled away from THIS post pretty quick.

lol

Nothing to respond to.  You are entitled to your incorrect opinions.
 

FJB » 22 Feb 2023, 8:50 am » wrote: ↑

22 Feb 2023, 8:50 am

funny how you don't address the fbi problem

you create an "FBI problem" to avoid addressing the core issue.  YOU are the one who is fear mongering... and considering you're such a cowardly homo ******, that is really EXTRA funny.
 

Blackvegetable » 22 Feb 2023, 8:15 am » wrote: ↑

22 Feb 2023, 8:15 am

Don't presume.

You're a moron.

 

Only a moron continues to strike thru facts and valid points and has no points of his own.

I accept your surrender.  

maineman » 22 Feb 2023, 8:51 am » wrote: ↑

22 Feb 2023, 8:51 am

you create an "FBI problem" to avoid addressing the core issue.  YOU are the one who is fear mongering... and considering you're such a cowardly homo ******, that is really EXTRA funny.

thata boy double down

maineman » 22 Feb 2023, 8:50 am » wrote: ↑

22 Feb 2023, 8:50 am

Is the right to bear arms individual and absolute?  Yes or No?

It is an individual right... YES

Nothing is absolute and you **** know it.

Stop asking stupid questions.

YOU LOST

maineman » 22 Feb 2023, 8:49 am » wrote: ↑

22 Feb 2023, 8:49 am

you just tap dance all the **** time, don't you?

WASN'T TALKING TO YOU ASSWIPE

ConsRule » 22 Feb 2023, 8:51 am » wrote: ↑

22 Feb 2023, 8:51 am

Nothing to respond to.  You are entitled to your incorrect opinions.

Do you think it is "incorrect" for someone to agree with another person some of the time and disagree with them at other times?  And if so, is it appropriate to use the issues one agrees with to bolster an argument one is having and not be compelled to stand behind the author on each and every issue past/present and in the future?

Huey » 22 Feb 2023, 8:53 am » wrote: ↑

22 Feb 2023, 8:53 am

 

Only a moron continues to strike thru facts and valid points and has no points of his own.

I accept your surrender.

Tiny,

You offer a limited menu of canned crap of your imagining. 

It isn't worth reading, and you don't have the peas to support it.

 

FJB » 22 Feb 2023, 8:12 am » wrote: ↑

22 Feb 2023, 8:12 am

What truly bothers me is the left is so intent on taking our rights away. Please explain why you all want to do that?

Lying *** hypocrite.  You want my nose out of your gun locker?  Get your nose out of my wife's reproductive organs.  Get your nose out of my neice's right to marry her girlfriend.   Get your nose out of anybody's right to have a sex reassignment.  You are perfectly happy to take away a woman's right to control over her own body.  You are perfectly happy to take away a woman's right or a minor child's right to medical confidentiality.  You are perfectly happy to take away the right of people to marry whoever they want.

You are a lying **** hypocrite twat.  You're more than happy to take away somebody else's rights to things you don't like.
 
 

FJB » 22 Feb 2023, 8:55 am » wrote: ↑

22 Feb 2023, 8:55 am

It is an individual right... YES

Nothing is absolute and you **** know it.

Stop asking stupid questions.

YOU LOST

"the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

How is preventing seven year olds from purchasing an AR-15 NOT an infringement on the rights of the people?