You don't believe life is self evident either, it always was. When everyone is intellectually ignoring how and why the specificity exists now, all the hope, faith, charity, generations practicing , power, wealth, fame achieved in self deception as a social greater good and larger illusions than instinctive intuition of living as one of a kind, just sustains what was promised in an afterlife was manifested into real time adapting to the moment here.ScottMon » 21 Feb 2023, 8:17 pm » wrote: ↑ I don't support taking guns away from lawful owners. But I also don't believe that Guns are Sacred Cows. We have a gun violence problem in America and it's heavily politized. We're taking tiny steps to stop it when we need a full on cooperation.
The better part of you was left dripping down the whorehouse wall.
why do you insist on putting words in my mouth, you ignorant ****?Z09 » 22 Feb 2023, 5:59 am » wrote: ↑ Maineman..
Will you be turning in your gun since you're convinced you have no right to have it?
ScottMon » 21 Feb 2023, 8:11 pm » wrote: ↑ Actually, states that its a well regulated militia. In modern terms, That means you're in the armed services defending the country.
He's absolutely correct.Punch » 20 Feb 2023, 8:05 pm » wrote: ↑
He's not wrong. Goodbye assault weapons. He's a passionate young man that has decided what his goal in life is. It is difficult to fight against that.
David Hogg says Second Amendment 'intentionally misinterpreted' to protect individual rights (msn.com)
(Full article at above link)
Gun control activist David Hogg recently stated that the Founding Fathers never intended the 2nd Amendment to protect an individual’s right to own a gun. Hogg wrote a Twitter thread on Sunday insisting that historians and law professors have informed him that the law was "intentionally misinterpreted" away from its intention to "protect state militias." "After reading about the history of the second amendment and talking with a lot of hist & law professors- I believe the second amendment has been intentionally misinterpreted. It was never meant as an individual right it was created to protect state militias like the national guard," Hogg tweeted.
He continued, "It says well-regulated militia for a reason. The ‘shall not be infringed’ part means the federal government is not allowed to forcibly disarm state militias. I’m not alone in this interpretation. Over 100 years of jurisprudence back me up on this."
He added, "To those who don’t agree that’s fine- you are entitled to your own opinion and I’m still ready to work with you on what we can agree on. Disagreement and hatred are not the same thing."
"When I graduate, I will be running for office. And I will win. Things will change, I promise you that."
that's not locked in stone, though, is it? SCOTUS once ruled that "separate but equal" was acceptable as well.FJB » 22 Feb 2023, 8:07 am » wrote: ↑ Except asshole, the Supreme Court has ruled it is an individual right
Have you seen the ones falling out of hers?maineman » 22 Feb 2023, 8:06 am » wrote: ↑ why do you insist on putting words in my mouth, you ignorant ****?
maineman » 22 Feb 2023, 8:09 am » wrote: ↑ that's not locked in stone, though, is it? SCOTUS once ruled that "separate but equal" was acceptable as well.
When the law says the public shall not have legal possession of automatic pistols and rifles, anybody who actually supports law and order will turn in their automatic pistols and rifles.Z09 » 22 Feb 2023, 5:59 am » wrote: ↑ Maineman..
Will you be turning in your gun since you're convinced you have no right to have it?
Don't presume.Huey » 22 Feb 2023, 8:12 am » wrote: ↑ You are wrong. I posted this yesterday:
And the counter to that is from the moment the 2nd was ratified in 1791 until 1934 when the National Firearms Act was signed, there was no gun legislation passed by the Federal Government. The framers became politicians and presidents and no changes were were made. None. As a matter of fact Madison funded research and development of technology to mass produce repeating rifles so the common citizen could afford one.
So I disagree with you.
Last I checked Madison was considered the father of the second amendment and instrumental in processes to make firearms cheaper for the common citizen.
It's not locked ever.... all it ever takes is a landmark case and everything changes. Roe v Wade was locked in stone too.FJB » 22 Feb 2023, 8:12 am » wrote: ↑ It is locked for right now...
What truly bothers me is the left is so intent on taking our rights away. Please explain why you all want to do that?
maineman » 22 Feb 2023, 8:17 am » wrote: ↑ It's not locked ever.... all it ever takes is a landmark case and everything changes. Roe v Wade was locked in stone too.
And I don't want to take anyone's rights away.
Two questions:
Do you think you have the right to own a surface to air shoulder mounted missile? And if not, why not?
Do you think we ought to allow seven year olds to purchase AR-15s? And if not, why not?
And exactly how have those red flag laws stopped gun violence?ScottMon » 21 Feb 2023, 8:24 pm » wrote: ↑ All over the country, Red Flag laws have popped up. Police forces are trained to rush the shooter instead of waiting outside like the Uvalde Cops did.
you really need to put on your big boy pants and answer questions.FJB » 22 Feb 2023, 8:20 am » wrote: ↑ 1. There is no Federal Ban on Abortion, Roe v Wade was not overturned.
2.Why do you leftist insist on bringing up types of weapons that will never be made available to the public?
3. There are already age limitations for AR's.
You people really need to STOP fearmongering.
maineman » 22 Feb 2023, 8:25 am » wrote: ↑ you really need to put on your big boy pants and answer questions.
Why ARE some arms not available to the public if the people's right to bear arms is individual and absolute?
Why ARE there age limitations for AR's if the people's right to bear arms is individual and absolute?
We don't know for sure if they have. But It's become necessary because nothing else is being done.ConsRule » 22 Feb 2023, 8:25 am » wrote: ↑ And exactly how have those red flag laws stopped gun violence?
ScottMon » 22 Feb 2023, 8:34 am » wrote: ↑ We don't know for sure if they have. But It's become necessary because nothing else is being done.
So you were making **** up...again.ScottMon » 22 Feb 2023, 8:34 am » wrote: ↑ We don't know for sure if they have. But It's become necessary because nothing else is being done.