You're an idiot.Vegas » 01 Mar 2023, 11:42 am » wrote: ↑ No moron. That's a claim. Name these "conservation easements." Specifically. Name some of these agreements between landowners.
Again, I don't have crayons.
Blackvegetable » 01 Mar 2023, 11:49 am » wrote: ↑ You're an idiot.
You have no idea what a CE is, or why it matters.
But if you want to learn, I can link you to a law review article by my friends Brad Updike and Bryan Mick.
But I'm not wasting a second of my life explaining it to you.
^^^ **** runner...
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom You've got that right.Vegas » 01 Mar 2023, 11:50 am » wrote: ↑ Oh for God sakes. You didn't know it also includes an agreement with landowners?
Another 'survivorship bias' moment.
****...Blackvegetable » 01 Mar 2023, 11:36 am » wrote: ↑ See for yourself.
Take the private industry payroll numbers at the start and end of each term since 1989.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom Vegas » 01 Mar 2023, 11:42 am » wrote: ↑ No moron. That's a claim. Name these "conservation easements." Specifically. Name some of these agreements between landowners.
Again, I don't have crayons.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom keep running ****...it's what you do best...
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom You're lying, Rog.
I wasn't asking for the specific landowner or land, I am asking for the general agreements...which are public knowledge. THE AGREEMENTS! Such as this:Blackvegetable » 01 Mar 2023, 11:55 am » wrote: ↑
There is no public listing of them....you know about individual cases because they find themselves targeted by the IRS....like the vise Grifty is in.
which generation gap one is evolving in now.Blackvegetable » 01 Mar 2023, 11:49 am » wrote: ↑ You're an idiot.
You have no idea what a CE is, or why it matters.
But if you want to learn, I can link you to a law review article by my friends Brad Updike and Bryan Mick.
But I'm not wasting a second of my life explaining it to you.
Vegas » 01 Mar 2023, 12:00 pm » wrote: ↑ I wasn't asking for the specific landowner or land, I am asking for the general agreements...which are public knowledge. THE AGREEMENTS! Such as this:
Microsoft Word - AppendixI_conseasements.doc (ca.gov)
These are examples. They specific landowners are not authorized for the public, but the agreements are.
Acknoweldge that you are stupid as hell. Now!
No..you weren't.I wasn't asking for the specific landowner or land, I am asking for the general agreements...
Blackvegetable » 01 Mar 2023, 12:04 pm » wrote: ↑
No..you weren't.
You can stop faking now.
You aren't even allowed to see CE proposals.
Constantly Evolving works a whole lot better than Common Era.Blackvegetable » 01 Mar 2023, 12:04 pm » wrote: ↑
No..you weren't.
You can stop faking now.
You aren't even allowed to see CE proposals.
Why?Vegas » 01 Mar 2023, 12:06 pm » wrote: ↑ If I show you my comment, you promise to take off a year.
Deal?
I love exposing your lies. Do it! Now!