Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
Who remembers when Conservatives supported environmental conservation?
Who remembers when Conservatives supported environmental conservation?
By Jes' Fuchinwitcha
1 Mar 2023 6:18 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
So, destroying one eco-system to save or remediate another isn't really "environmental improvement" then is it.Jes'Fuchinwitcha » 01 Mar 2023, 7:32 am » wrote: ↑ Remediating or preventing damage to ecological systems.
What is your definition? (please feel free to use anyone else’s definition if you can’t think of one)
That was not a question.
That's all I wanted to know.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
You’re making **** up again.RebelGator » 01 Mar 2023, 7:39 am » wrote: ↑ I see now, you want the case to be dismissed on procedural grounds.....just like the election fraud.
Tell me what charges you (and Jordan) think the DOJ should open an investigation into. “Everybody knows” is not a basis for an investigation, either for alleged election fraud or HB. Perhaps the DOJ took a look already and didn’t find sufficient cause.
Great contribution to the discussion Rico.Blackvegetable » 01 Mar 2023, 7:37 am » wrote: ↑ It's so much more than that.
Ginger has a tude about that type of thing.
Ginger is a **** idiot.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
Are you deliberately trying to be pointlessly obscure?RedheadedStranger » 01 Mar 2023, 7:42 am » wrote: ↑ So, destroying one eco-system to save or remediate another isn't really "environmental improvement" then is it.
That was not a question.
That's all I wanted to know.
The fact that no “Conservative” here can post a single thing about supporting environmental conservation is persuasive evidence that you all don’t support it.
You didn't counter my point... as usual.Jes'Fuchinwitcha » 01 Mar 2023, 7:49 am » wrote: ↑ Are you deliberately trying to be pointlessly obscure?
The fact that no “Conservative” here can post a single thing about supporting environmental conservation is persuasive evidence that you all don’t support it.
Maybe the veggie man can help you out.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
Jes'Fuchinwitcha » 01 Mar 2023, 7:49 am » wrote: ↑ Are you deliberately trying to be pointlessly obscure?
The fact that no “Conservative” here can post a single thing about supporting environmental conservation is persuasive evidence that you all don’t support it.
Teddy Roosevelt was a big conservationist.
Don't dig the hole any deeper, Rusty..
You're right... I should start covering you on up now, before you start to stink.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
6 feet is good for you bitch
You haven’t addressed my point, nothing but dodge and deflect so far.RedheadedStranger » 01 Mar 2023, 7:51 am » wrote: ↑ You didn't counter my point... as usual.
Maybe the veggie man can help you out.
I don’t even know what point you thought you made. It certainly wasn’t on topic, whatever it was. Maybe you should read the title of the thread and the OP again?
Sure it was.Jes'Fuchinwitcha » 01 Mar 2023, 7:54 am » wrote: ↑ You haven’t addressed my point, nothing but dodge and deflect so far.
I don’t even know what point you thought you made. It certainly wasn’t on topic, whatever it was. Maybe you should read the title of the thread and the OP again?
You were saying that conservatives didn't support "environmental improvement" and I pointed out that anyone that would destroy one eco-system to save another isn't supporting it either.
How is that not on topic?
Personally, I whole heartedly support conservation... but the **** that's going on with the "green" movement ain't it.
It's merely trading one set of problems for another... and the environment is still suffering. More so in many cases.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
You have no substance and no integrity.RedheadedStranger » 01 Mar 2023, 8:01 am » wrote: ↑ Sure it was.
You were saying that conservatives didn't support "environmental improvement" and I pointed out that anyone that would destroy one eco-system to save another isn't supporting it either.
How is that not on topic?
Personally, I whole heartedly support conservation... but the **** that's going on with the "green" movement ain't it.
It's merely trading one set of problems for another... and the environment is still suffering. More so in many cases.
And you can't counter my point.
Have a nice day.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
WHAT DO YOU SUPPORT…?
Personally, I whole heartedly support conservation... but the **** that's going on with the "green" movement
in other words he kicked your ***.
Certainly not this...
https://www.brookings.edu/blog/up-front ... l-problem/
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
He validated my point that Conservatives don’t support environment conservation. Dodging and deflection, like you do, is the opposite of “***-kicking”. You guys kick your own asses, then gloat about it.
Actually I made the point that "greenies" don't support it either... they just like to say they do to try and claim the moral high ground... as you did in the OP.Jes'Fuchinwitcha » 01 Mar 2023, 8:13 am » wrote: ↑ He validated my point that Conservatives don’t support environment conservation. Dodging and deflection, like you do, is the opposite of “***-kicking”. You guys kick your own asses, then gloat about it.
That seems to have put a burr in your saddle as well.
Oh well.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
Are you a sock for Rubba? And DumDuk?RedheadedStranger » 01 Mar 2023, 8:15 am » wrote: ↑ Actually I made the point that "greenies" don't support it either... they just like to say they do to try and claim the moral high ground... as you did in the OP.
That seems to have put a burr in your saddle as well.
Oh well.
Even if we assume this is a true statement (and I don't), exactly what does that have to do with the subject of this thread?Blackvegetable » 01 Mar 2023, 7:28 am » wrote: ↑ Since 1989, GOP administrations have generated negative private industry payroll "growth"..
Who is online
In total there are 3163 users online :: 8 registered, 16 bots, and 3139 guests
Registered users: Johnny You, Blackvegetable, ROG62, RebelGator, Beekeeper, LowIQTrash, SouthernFried, nefarious101
Bots: Mediatoolkitbot, NING, Bolt, LieBaoFast, okhttp, YandexBot, ADmantX, Applebot, facebookexternalhit, Googlebot, CriteoBot, curl/7, Baiduspider, proximic, bingbot, Mediapartners-Google