Liberal Forum

Z09 » 02 Mar 2023, 7:21 am » wrote: ↑

02 Mar 2023, 7:21 am

Remember Pelosi saying it's "pay as we go"...???

That was $24 trillion ago

You must mean "before Supply Side Idiocy, Part Deux"...

When there was serious talk of eliminating the Debt Held by the Public.


 

Both parties spend way too much. I keep hearing/seeing people talk about spending control initiatives failing in the past. So? Because someone or something failed in the past, does that mean we never try again? If that approach was universal, we wouldn't have incandescent electric light. Only idiots use excuses like "That failed in the past" and "An approach like that would be hard". **** that. Try until you succeed or get the **** out of the way. We'll put someone in who isn't a lazy coward.

golfboy » 01 Mar 2023, 10:35 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Mar 2023, 10:35 pm

You want a dollar increase in the debt ceiling?
Fine, you have to cut a dollar in spending. 

Seems right.

It is right.

nuckinfutz » 01 Mar 2023, 11:23 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Mar 2023, 11:23 pm

Bill Clinton didn't need that crap to cut the deficit!
You are a sucker for gimmicks, typical Rethuglirat!    

 

No, all Bubba did was give taxpayers the largest tax hike in 50 years just months after lying to voters by stating there was no plan to increase taxes, and idiots like YOU cheered him on!

And according to you, that's not a "gimmick", huh?
 

Str8tEdge » 01 Mar 2023, 11:43 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Mar 2023, 11:43 pm

I’ll give him credit for cheating on his hag wife. Dude a playa.

In fairness, I would have cheated on her also...I mean, as soon as she became first lady, she let herself go. A man has needs. 

Vegas » 02 Mar 2023, 3:02 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Mar 2023, 3:02 pm

In fairness, I would have cheated on her also...I mean, as soon as she became first lady, she let herself go. A man has needs.

Ya, no blame on that one. 
 

golfboy » 01 Mar 2023, 10:35 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Mar 2023, 10:35 pm

You want a dollar increase in the debt ceiling?
Fine, you have to cut a dollar in spending. 

Seems right.

I like it.  It is more than right.  Some might even say generous.
 

Trumprules » 01 Mar 2023, 10:37 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Mar 2023, 10:37 pm

The democrats used to call it pay go. Ypu mean.rephblucans want to do what they repealed in the 90s. I didnt realize you are a liberal.

32 Trillion Dollars in National Debt.
What is the Dem Team solution ?       
"SPEND MORE MONEY!!!    Let's max-out the credit cards" !!!

Have you ever been married to a woman like that ?    I have.
She drove me half-bonkers......and into the 'poor-house'.                         
"Thank God & Greyhound, she gone".
                                                                                   Roy Clark
https://youtu.be/7u-h9nnMKdg

Blackvegetable » 02 Mar 2023, 7:16 am » wrote: ↑

02 Mar 2023, 7:16 am

They abandoned it under Scrub.

**** idiot.

The Dems are spending money like a drunken sailor on shore-leave.
They are driving us into bankruptcy.                                           
@slideman  ​​​​​​​
 

nuckinfutz » 01 Mar 2023, 11:23 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Mar 2023, 11:23 pm

Bill Clinton didn't need that crap to cut the deficit!
You are a sucker for gimmicks, typical Rethuglirat!    

Remember when Ronald Reagan was Gov. of Cali ?
Cali was in good hands & moving uphill.
Look at it now under Dem control.
Every big city there is deteriorating into a 3rd.-world city.               
"White-Flight" gets worse every year.                                                                   

golfboy » 01 Mar 2023, 11:24 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Mar 2023, 11:24 pm

All he needed was Newt Gingrich. 
3 vetoes later, he was forced to sign a balanced budget.

Didn't Clinton raid social security to feed the illusion of a balanced budget surplus?