if you hadn't started the post with fourPOM » 06 Mar 2023, 7:08 pm » wrote: ↑![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Hey man,
Would you accept an apology and we start fresh? An "olive branch" of sort?
from a guy who was never an officer. man up. vote on this thread. show your true colors. quit being a casper milquetoast.RedheadedStranger » 06 Mar 2023, 7:12 pm » wrote: ↑ I have yet to see any proof that he posted it to "garner sympathy". As I said, without context I can't say that he did or didn't.
What I do know for a fact, is that you are ridiculing a fallen veteran, purported or not.... and saying that you're justified in doing so because someone made you mad, and that you don't know if it's even true or not if he had a son in the Navy to begin with.
That doesn't seem very officer like at all regardless.
I was following your examples of derogatory posts.maineman » 06 Mar 2023, 7:31 pm » wrote: ↑ if you hadn't started the post with fourand if you hadn't followed the post with another derogatory one, I would perhaps consider it. But if "ifs and buts were candy and nuts" what a merry Christmas we would all have.
I don't see the "he's just a petty asshole" option.maineman » 06 Mar 2023, 7:32 pm » wrote: ↑ from a guy who was never an officer. man up. vote on this thread. show your true colors. quit being a casper milquetoast.
yes.POM » 06 Mar 2023, 7:34 pm » wrote: ↑ I was following your examples of derogatory posts.
I didn't hear back from you.
I was hoping you were going to say yes.
complain o the author of the OP...RedheadedStranger » 06 Mar 2023, 7:35 pm » wrote: ↑ I don't see the "he's just a petty asshole" option.
I did.maineman » 06 Mar 2023, 7:53 pm » wrote: ↑ complain o the author of the OP...
or just abandon whatever principles you might've had and stand proudly with him.
sleep well, in that case.RedheadedStranger » 06 Mar 2023, 7:55 pm » wrote: ↑ I did.
I'm not the one lacking principles in this case either.
the ballot doesn't have the option to choose as the two choices won't discuss the problem as a whole self destruction tendencies of this species to perform all 5 generation gaps ignoring the same thing.POM » 06 Mar 2023, 6:37 pm » wrote: ↑ 8 pages
9 votes
:wave: :wave: :wave: :wave: :wave: :wave: :wave:
@Str8tEdge GREAT THREAD MAN! GREAT THREAD
don't voteNostradamus'omh » 07 Mar 2023, 6:37 am » wrote: ↑ the ballot doesn't have the option to choose as the two choices won't discuss the problem as a whole self destruction tendencies of this species to perform all 5 generation gaps ignoring the same thing.
no and no. I have a family of next generations to protect from your incessant denying life in real time. You won't accept genetics eternally separates your time living here now, but it always has and never will change regardless how long you deny it in your generation or those you trained to follow replacing your time occupying space here.
yesNostradamus'omh » 07 Mar 2023, 7:39 am » wrote: ↑ no and no. I have a family to protect from your incessant denying life in real time.
You will before I do. Your reality is over, just not done yet.
Nostradamus'omh » 07 Mar 2023, 7:41 am » wrote: ↑ You will before I do. Your reality is over, just not done yet.
The dude is one booster away from the big one.
In reality how many social roles can any ancestor play simultaneusly here same as any other reproduciton ever existed to this point of evolution?POM » 07 Mar 2023, 9:05 am » wrote: ↑Yup
.Nostradamus'omh » 07 Mar 2023, 9:11 am » wrote: ↑ In reality how many social roles can any ancestor play simultaneusly....
Great diversion protecting a contextual mind from an instinctive brain. What became of your fertilized cell's mucleus since conceived?MackTheFinger » 07 Mar 2023, 9:38 am » wrote: ↑ .
This is the beginning of a incorect sentence so why bother reading the rest.
No wonder they threw you out of the boyscouts.