Can a CHILD at age 13 sign a LEGALLY BINDING CONTRACT?? Nope.IkeBana » 05 Mar 2023, 10:54 am » wrote: ↑ My morals are about protecting children, sadly...way too often from their own parents...including a child's right to privacy protection under the confidentiality statutes in every State. And that includes privacy from parents, if that's what the child wants and if the child is of legal age. As moral as it gets. You aren't interedted in ethics or morality, you're all about some **** up christian dogma.
screw you ya drunk
You enjoy mocking the cognitively impaired, you **** weasel.HotblackDesiato » 05 Mar 2023, 12:48 pm » wrote: ↑ Heavens above, who on Earth do you think you are? Protecting children by allowing adolescents who've barely got one foot in life yet, to make irreversible, life altering decisions that'll make them infertile, based on a facile fashion that's borne from psychiatric delusion?.. and that's to protect them from the loving concern of their parents, who would stop them from doing that destructive **** to themselves?
Are you a total retard?
I'm the weasel? You're using the law as a shield and a justification for, destroying the lives, futures and future potential fertility of children... but I'm the weasel?IkeBana » 05 Mar 2023, 3:59 pm » wrote: ↑ The law is the law dumb ***. A child of the You enjoy mocking the cognitively impaired, you **** weasel.
Its the law. Dont like it? Vote for some vote whoring scumbag who will change the law to what you want.HotblackDesiato » 05 Mar 2023, 4:46 pm » wrote: ↑ I'm the weasel? You're using the law as a shield and a justification for, destroying the lives, futures and future potential fertility of children... but I'm the weasel?
You've got to be **** kidding me
You just can't control yourself, can you? Keep your disgusting child molesting groomer hands off our children, YOU SICK ****!IkeBana » 05 Mar 2023, 6:18 am » wrote: ↑ most states protects the privacy of children 12 years of age and older, from everybody, including the child's parent's.
So you are saying that CHILDREN have a "right to give their consent"!!IkeBana » 05 Mar 2023, 4:55 pm » wrote: ↑ Its the law. Dont like it? Vote for some vote whoring scumbag who will change the law to what you want.
Most trans and LGBTQ kids who suicide, do it because of the shame, rejection, and abandonment loaded on them by their asshole parents and other family members. And I will support them and work with them to secure their privacy and protection as long as I'm a licensed provider of mental health services.
It's a family tradition
The strength of this land
Where what's right and wrong
Is the back of a hand
Turns girls into women
A boy to a man
But the rights of the children
Have nowhere to stand
k.d. lang
He's most likely a member of NAMBLA and wants the age of consent lower to 8Beekeeper » 05 Mar 2023, 5:24 pm » wrote: ↑ So you are saying that CHILDREN have a "right to give their consent"!!
AND that means a CHILD RAPIST can claim "they consented to sex" and the LAWS SHOULD PROTECT THEM since you claim that "children have a right to consent and a right to privacy"!!
Without a doubt. I haven't seen a single one of these PERVERTED LWNJ's that WASN'T involved in man/child sex.Warcok » 05 Mar 2023, 5:26 pm » wrote: ↑ He's most likely a member of NAMBLA and wants the age of consent lower to 8
Easy to see the difference between a professional like me and a **** MAGA/Q-ANON lunatic fringe headcase like you.Warcok » 05 Mar 2023, 5:13 pm » wrote: ↑You just can't control yourself, can you? Keep your disgusting child molesting groomer hands off our children, YOU SICK ****!IkeBana » 05 Mar 2023, 6:18 am » wrote: ↑ most states protects the privacy of children 12 years of age and older, from everybody, including the child's parent's.
You are the perfect example of why most parents want the death penalty for pedophiles.
I'm willing to bet Needledick The **** has never been face to face with an actual pedophile in his life. Yes, agreed, you haven't seen a single one of these pervets, ever in your pathetic life.Beekeeper » 05 Mar 2023, 5:50 pm » wrote: ↑ Without a doubt. I haven't seen a single one of these PERVERTED LWNJ's that WASN'T involved in man/child sex.
In the state of Illinois, children 12 years old and over have legal statute confidentiality rights and no state licensed mental health professional can disclose the content of counseling sessions without a written release of information signed by the child. There are similar laws in all 50 states, the only major difference from state to state is the age of consent which can vary typically between 11 and 14 years.Beekeeper » 05 Mar 2023, 5:24 pm » wrote: ↑ So you are saying that CHILDREN have a "right to give their consent"!!
And pedophiles like yourself support these groomer laws that allows the state to undermine the parents and go behind their backs and start feeding their 12yo kids puberty blockers and prepping them for mutilation surgeries.IkeBana » 05 Mar 2023, 6:20 pm » wrote: ↑ In the state of Illinois, children 12 years old and over have legal statute confidentiality rights and no state licensed mental health professional can disclose the content of counseling sessions without a written release of information signed by the child.
Yet, NO CHILD UNDER AGE 18 can sign a LEGALLY BINDING CONTRACT!!!IkeBana » 05 Mar 2023, 6:20 pm » wrote: ↑ In the state of Illinois, children 12 years old and over have legal statute confidentiality rights and no state licensed mental health professional can disclose the content of counseling sessions without a written release of information signed by the child. There are similar laws in all 50 states, the only major difference from state to state is the age of consent which can vary typically between 11 and 14 years.
Dont like it? Find some vote whoring weasel politician who will try to change the law to the one you want, or have the law revoked. But understand that revocation puts child victims of physical abuse, sexual abuse, and neglect by their own abusive parents at risk.
As if you actually give a **** about the well being of child victims of parental abuse...and it's everywhere in this country.
Oh you belong to NAMBLA TOO!!IkeBana » 05 Mar 2023, 6:05 pm » wrote: ↑ I'm willing to bet Needledick The **** has never been face to face with an actual pedophile in his life. Yes, agreed, you haven't seen a single one of these pervets, ever in your pathetic life.
You can rant all you want. Its the law. I'm just letting you know what the law says. Its why the school social worker in the breast binding case was advising the student exactly as called for by state confidentiality law when the kid was advised that she doesnt have to report anything to her parents nor would the social worker.Beekeeper » 05 Mar 2023, 8:22 pm » wrote: ↑ Yet, NO CHILD UNDER AGE 18 can sign a LEGALLY BINDING CONTRACT!!!
So you support the CHILD PREDATORS who will claim "I got consent" for SEX with a 12 year old who got PREGNANT!!
How can a CHILD give MEDICAL TREATMENT consent?? and then you will claim they can't give "consent to have sex with an adult"and that adult should be hung or castrated?????
See, you live under a DOUBLE STANDARD of LIES AND ****!!
Actually...NASW.
IkeBana » 05 Mar 2023, 6:18 am » wrote: ↑ We got pages and pages of pissing, moaning, sniveling, and whining about minor children being transitioned and groomed by school teachers and school coundelors. We got idiots who hate the law bitching about licensed mental health professionals protecting minor children by folliwing confidentiality law...which in most states protects the privacy of children 12 years of age and older, from everybody, including the child's parent's. We got alleged conservatives who want physicians who do sex reassignment transition surgery on any kid under the age of 18 thrown into prison. And yet...
Here on November 21, 2022 we have Trump supporter and pal Caitlyn Jenner suggesting that the only trans girls who should be allowed to compete in women's sports competitions are those who transitioned before the age of 12 and did not go through male puberty. Those early transitioned trans girls are the only real girls according to Caitlyn.
Want proof...here you go...
foxnews /media/caitlyn-jenner-woke-washington-rules-trans-runner-dominate-female-competitors
The specific statement by Jenner on when trans women athletes needed to have transitioned begins at 2:25. You **** conjob assholes need to decide which way you want this.
Sorry you have to copy and paste the FOX link. I would have posted the link that includes the video, but I can't...see my sig line below.
So you ADMIT you are fully in favor of "privacy and consent" laws that would give YOU the ability to have PERVERTED SEX with underage children who are LEGALLY UNABLE TO SIGN ANY CONTRACT!! AND to claim that you have ":consensual sex" so you don't g to prison.IkeBana » 05 Mar 2023, 9:20 pm » wrote: ↑ You can rant all you want. Its the law. I'm just letting you know what the law says. Its why the school social worker in the breast binding case was advising the student exactly as called for by state confidentiality law when the kid was advised that she doesnt have to report anything to her parents nor would the social worker.
So hollar all you want. The law is the law...argue it some more if you like wasting your time and sounding like a petulant teenager.
Your insane. soul mates.FOS » 05 Mar 2023, 10:14 pm » wrote: ↑ why do you think i would give a **** what bruce jenner has to say? hes crazy.