Liberal Forum

Str8tEdge » 05 Mar 2023, 11:45 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Mar 2023, 11:45 pm

Can you name any legitimate reason to sexualize children beyond grooming for pedophilia? 

2. Why do you believe it’s NOT a threat to children to sexualize them for pedophilia?

@Xavier_Onassis  is a **** pervert.

It's that simple. He lusts for child flesh.
 

Cannonpointer » 06 Mar 2023, 12:26 am » wrote: ↑

06 Mar 2023, 12:26 am

@Xavier_Onassis  is a **** pervert.

It's that simple. He lusts for child flesh.

Must be. It’s really difficult to give these groomers and supporters of grooming any benefit of doubt at this point. Bet he’s got kiddie porn on the computer. 

Blackvegetable » 05 Mar 2023, 9:45 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Mar 2023, 9:45 pm

Post an example...

He won't, but I will.
Living never exceeds mutually evolving forward as each unique reproductions of every species occupying time to the moment here each has its own relative cycle occupying space now.

Str8tEdge » 06 Mar 2023, 12:48 am » wrote: ↑

06 Mar 2023, 12:48 am

Must be. It’s really difficult to give these groomers and supporters of grooming any benefit of doubt at this point. Bet he’s got kiddie porn on the computer. 

Groomers educate character role playing matters cradle to grave. Pick an ideologies to defend cradle to grave or your time living means nothing to those dedicated to denying now is eternity.
guess what spawns ruthlessness, relentlessness to faith promising better tomorrows because life itself doesn't exceed evolving here now.

Misery loves company or humanities wouldn't exist naturally, as they don't anyway. Reasonable doubt keeps them here every generation gap by intellectual design from within this species.

Blackvegetable » 05 Mar 2023, 9:45 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Mar 2023, 9:45 pm

Post an example...

How can I post an example of your original thoughts when you have yet to post any? 

Idiot. 

Cannonpointer » 06 Mar 2023, 12:26 am » wrote: ↑

06 Mar 2023, 12:26 am

@Xavier_Onassis  is a **** pervert.

It's that simple. He lusts for child flesh.

^^correct o mundo

Xavier_Onassis » 05 Mar 2023, 1:49 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Mar 2023, 1:49 pm

Just showing children his dick isn't hurting anyone. It's obvious he's only having some fun. 

 
 

Xavier_Onassis » 05 Mar 2023, 1:49 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Mar 2023, 1:49 pm

When a transgendered drag queen wipes out a classroom with an AR-15 I promise I will post it.
Okay? Just showing children his dick isn't hurting anyone. It's obvious he's only having some fun. 

@Xavier_Onassis   Oh my **** God! Did you seriously say this?
 
 
 

Rock » 08 Mar 2023, 7:58 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Mar 2023, 7:58 pm

@Xavier_Onassis   Oh my **** God! Did you seriously say this?

Yes!

 

Xavier_Onassis » 05 Mar 2023, 1:49 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Mar 2023, 1:49 pm

Just showing children his dick isn't hurting anyone. It's obvious he's only having some fun. 

Xavier_Onassis » 05 Mar 2023, 1:47 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Mar 2023, 1:47 pm

I post memes because they are more amusing than posting original text.
And it was the right thing to do, because you actually READ them.

always the attention getter. But why attract attention away from actual events? What secret do people hide as everyone agreeing to disagree about one thing throughout history each generation changing current events as a New World Order..

At no point did anyone claim that what DeSantis wanted to ban involved a dick pic. All that was reported was that Fox said they could not show it on TV. That does not mean it is porn, and no one in this forum knows what the photo (if it was a photo) even was.
I did not say it should be banned, or that it should not be banned.
What I said was that there was insufficient evidence that it deserved to be considered to merit banning.

Xavier_Onassis » 10 Mar 2023, 11:08 am » wrote: ↑

10 Mar 2023, 11:08 am

At no point did anyone claim that what DeSantis wanted to ban involved a dick pic. All that was reported was that Fox said they could not show it on TV. That does not mean it is porn, and no one in this forum knows what the photo (if it was a photo) even was.
I did not say it should be banned, or that it should not be banned.
What I said was that there was insufficient evidence that it deserved to be considered to merit banning.

Keep working that reasonable doubt angle, I really think your Pandora's box fell apart and all that was left in it escaped.

Nostradamus'omh » 10 Mar 2023, 11:11 am » wrote: ↑

10 Mar 2023, 11:11 am

Keep working that reasonable doubt angle, I really think your Pandora's box fell apart and all that was left in it escaped.

Of course you do, that is how your defective thinker works. Or more specifically, how it malfunctions.
 

Nostradamus'omh » 10 Mar 2023, 11:11 am » wrote: ↑

10 Mar 2023, 11:11 am

Keep working that reasonable doubt angle, I really think your Pandora's box fell apart and all that was left in it escaped.

Of course that is what you really think. But that is the way your defective thinker works, or more specifically, how it malfunctions.

Xavier_Onassis » 10 Mar 2023, 11:20 am » wrote: ↑

10 Mar 2023, 11:20 am

Of course that is what you really think. But that is the way your defective thinker works, or more specifically, how it malfunctions.

My detective thinker is adapting as part of the whole process.

your thought reciting mind is trying to control outcome beyond the time you only exit as evolving forward now.

Nostradamus'omh » 10 Mar 2023, 11:30 am » wrote: ↑

10 Mar 2023, 11:30 am

My defective thinker is adapting as part of the whole process.

your thought reciting mind is trying to control outcome beyond the time you only exit as evolving forward now.

Individual people do not physically evolve, dimwit.
No one "exits time". 

death  does not result on a <*POOF!*> "he just disappeared, where did he go". event.

Xavier_Onassis » 10 Mar 2023, 11:43 am » wrote: ↑

10 Mar 2023, 11:43 am

Individual people do not physically evolve, dimwit.
No one "exits time". 

death  does not result on a <*POOF!*> "he just disappeared, where did he go". event.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ gave away his sole reason for being alive here now.^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Xavier_Onassis » 05 Mar 2023, 1:49 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Mar 2023, 1:49 pm

When a transgendered drag queen wipes out a classroom with an AR-15 I promise I will post it.
Okay? Just showing children his dick isn't hurting anyone. It's obvious he's only having some fun. 

We already had a *** tranny wipe out a elementary school of 9-year-olds


You should kill yourself, Pedo.

Xavier_Onassis » 10 Mar 2023, 11:08 am » wrote: ↑

10 Mar 2023, 11:08 am

At no point did anyone claim that what DeSantis wanted to ban involved a dick pic. All that was reported was that Fox said they could not show it on TV. That does not mean it is porn, and no one in this forum knows what the photo (if it was a photo) even was.
I did not say it should be banned, or that it should not be banned.
What I said was that there was insufficient evidence that it deserved to be considered to merit banning.

You also said this......

Xavier_Onassis » 05 Mar 2023, 2:49 pm » wrote: ↑
05 Mar 2023, 2:49 pm
Just showing children his dick isn't hurting anyone. It's obvious he's only having some fun. 

 

 ̶B̶l̶a̶c̶k̶v̶e̶g̶e̶t̶a̶b̶l̶e̶
̶
̶I̶ ̶t̶h̶i̶n̶k̶ ̶y̶o̶u̶ ̶s̶h̶o̶u̶l̶d̶ ̶s̶t̶a̶y̶ ̶t̶h̶e̶ ̶f̶u̶c̶k̶ ̶o̶u̶t̶.̶
̶
̶N̶o̶ ̶o̶n̶e̶ ̶n̶e̶e̶d̶s̶ ̶a̶ ̶p̶o̶s̶t̶ ̶m̶o̶n̶i̶t̶o̶r̶.̶.̶.̶.̶p̶a̶r̶t̶i̶c̶u̶l̶a̶r̶l̶y̶ ̶n̶o̶t̶ ̶a̶ ̶l̶o̶s̶e̶r̶ ̶w̶h̶o̶ ̶c̶a̶n̶'̶t̶ ̶g̶e̶n̶e̶r̶a̶t̶e̶ ̶a̶n̶y̶ ̶i̶n̶t̶e̶r̶e̶s̶t̶ ̶i̶n̶ ̶h̶i̶s̶ ̶o̶w̶n̶ ̶c̶o̶n̶t̶r̶i̶b̶u̶t̶i̶o̶n̶s̶.̶

Don't come back to the forum, GROOMER...
 

Xavier_Onassis » 05 Mar 2023, 1:49 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Mar 2023, 1:49 pm

Okay? Just showing children his dick isn't hurting anyone. It's obvious he's only having some fun. 

You disgust me. You **** pervert. I can't believe that you literally said this. I am going to troll you something fierce you son of a bitch!