Liberal Forum

ROG62 » 08 Mar 2023, 9:03 am » wrote: ↑

08 Mar 2023, 9:03 am

i just found some new footage...

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=7pcuBIXU1vQ

I love that scene. "people should know when they are conquered"

Neo » 08 Mar 2023, 8:50 am » wrote: ↑

08 Mar 2023, 8:50 am

If progressives didn't have double standards they wouldn't have any standards at all.

Exactly. I just posted the same thing earlier.  Great minds think alike.     

maineman » 08 Mar 2023, 8:43 am » wrote: ↑

08 Mar 2023, 8:43 am

cool story.  no proof, however.
a little shop worn... a little pathetic, but your persistence makes it cool.

All bark you **** coward. All bark
the tapes prove it beyond a reasonable doubt 
 

Misty » 07 Mar 2023, 3:28 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Mar 2023, 3:28 pm

First of all, I am NOT outraged.
I knew exactly what the outcome would be as soon as Tucker was handed that video.
It was predictable since he has been trying to whitewash what happened that day all along.

Secondly if I am upset it's only because I actually feel sorry for the people who are putting any faith into this obviously false narrative.

And lastly, if you honestly believe that transparency is what you are getting from Tucker Carlson, I pity you.

His own text messages proved that he wants anything but transparency for his viewers. 
He knowingly lied to them by continuing to put people on the air that he knew were lying.

The J6 unselect committee of Trump haters purposely selected and edited segments of the videos that fit their goddamn LIES about J6 protests against a fraudulent and rigged election.

Carlson's transparency is blowing their false narrative to pieces.   ****, liberal idiots are losing it!!!  


And the J6 unslelect dim-0-crap persecution of Trump supporters intentionally had "witnesses" that LIED!!!

 

RedheadedStranger » 08 Mar 2023, 8:50 am » wrote: ↑

08 Mar 2023, 8:50 am

So... do YOU think the recently released footage changes the mainstream media and the J6 committee's narratives at all, or no?

I certainly do.

As I said earlier... if there had been hundreds of video surveillance cameras at Dealey Plaza in Dallas on November 22, 1963, I would guess that 99.9% of those hours of videotape would have shown happy, excited Texans standing and waving and getting ready to greet the handsome young president and his gorgeous wife as they drove by.

If someone were to release all that footage from that day, would all those smiling happy peaceful Texans capture on film  change YOUR perception of what happened on that day?

Does the fact that, once the barriers were breached, once the windows were smashed, once the doors were broken into, once the capitol police realized they were horribly outnumbered and retreated deeper into the building, once people could just walk in unabated and unchallenged, somehow change the reality that there WAS a great deal of serious violence happening in several locations throughout the building?  Windows were being smashed, LEO's were being beaten, fire extinguishers were being used to smash doors and barriers throughout the capitol.  Video footage of other areas where violence was not occurring does not mean it wasn't actually happening.  There really WAS a gallows... the crowd really DID surge through the building shouting "Hang Mike Pence".  The insurrectionists really DID want to stop the certification of the electoral college and they, in fact, succeeded in delaying it for several hours while members of congress and the vice president hid for their lives.  SOME people may have been able to walk around parts of the capitol looking like non-violent bystanders, but so what?

Dealey Plaza was filled with folks like that too.

Neo » 07 Mar 2023, 7:47 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Mar 2023, 7:47 pm

Accusing Tucker of selectively edition after years of showing selectively edited videos strikes me as a tad hypocritical.

just a tad...
 

POM » 08 Mar 2023, 9:16 am » wrote: ↑

08 Mar 2023, 9:16 am

All bark you **** coward. All bark
the tapes prove it beyond a reasonable doubt

two words:

Dealey Plaza

maineman » 07 Mar 2023, 9:17 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Mar 2023, 9:17 pm

I can take whatever childish insults you can dish out.  It's like water off a duck's back for me.

I merely ask the question:  to what end?  What do you accomplish if all you do is toss epithets at your enemies?

How does America ever move beyond this mess?

It won't...social media saw to that...
 

maineman » 08 Mar 2023, 9:19 am » wrote: ↑

08 Mar 2023, 9:19 am

As I said earlier... if there had been hundreds of video surveillance cameras at Dealey Plaza in Dallas on November 22, 1963, I would guess that 99.9% of those hours of videotape would have shown happy, excited Texans standing and waving and getting ready to greet the handsome young president and his gorgeous wife as they drove by.

If someone were to release all that footage from that day, would all those smiling happy peaceful Texans capture on film  change YOUR perception of what happened on that day?

Does the fact that, once the barriers were breached, once the windows were smashed, once the doors were broken into, once the capitol police realized they were horribly outnumbered and retreated deeper into the building, once people could just walk in unabated and unchallenged, somehow change the reality that there WAS a great deal of serious violence happening in several locations throughout the building?  Windows were being smashed, LEO's were being beaten, fire extinguishers were being used to smash doors and barriers throughout the capitol.  Video footage of other areas where violence was not occurring does not mean it wasn't actually happening.  There really WAS a gallows... the crowd really DID surge through the building shouting "Hang Mike Pence".  The insurrectionists really DID want to stop the certification of the electoral college and they, in fact, succeeded in delaying it for several hours while members of congress and the vice president hid for their lives.  SOME people may have been able to walk around parts of the capitol looking like non-violent bystanders, but so what?

Dealey Plaza was filled with folks like that too.

Hey liberal prick, does the fact that "all those happy peaceful Texans" were at Dealey Plaza make them as guilty as Kennedy's assassin?   The biased J6 dog and pony show and you goddamn ****, liberal idiots think all those in attendance (except the FBI plants and informants) are guilty of insurrection. 
 

Buffalo » 08 Mar 2023, 9:50 am » wrote: ↑

08 Mar 2023, 9:50 am

Hey liberal prick, does the fact that "all those happy peaceful Texans" were at Dealey Plaza make them as guilty as Kennedy's assassin?   The biased J6 dog and pony show and you goddamn ****, liberal idiots think all those in attendance (except the FBI plants and informants) are guilty of insurrection.

Don't tell mainemarxist...but the FBI already said it's NOT defined as an insurrection.   

maineman » 08 Mar 2023, 9:26 am » wrote: ↑

08 Mar 2023, 9:26 am

two words:

Dealey Plaza

You go for the tour, come home in a body bag.

 

Buffalo » 08 Mar 2023, 9:50 am » wrote: ↑

08 Mar 2023, 9:50 am

Hey liberal prick, does the fact that "all those happy peaceful Texans" were at Dealey Plaza make them as guilty as Kennedy's assassin?   The biased J6 dog and pony show and you goddamn ****, liberal idiots think all those in attendance (except the FBI plants and informants) are guilty of insurrection.

Of course not.... but video of non-violent citizens does not change the fact that violence was, in fact, occurring in other areas of the building.  Windows were broken barriers were breached.  doors were smashed offices were broken into.  LEOs were beaten.  The constitutional transfer of power was delayed. 

roadkill » 07 Mar 2023, 7:16 am » wrote: ↑

07 Mar 2023, 7:16 am

I've spent hours in the park listening to the grass...it's indescribable.

my grass speaks 6 languages fluently.

I see I missed something, I saw the trumprules sok have a meltdown this morning but I didn't get it.. now I know what caused it..

 

https://youtu.be/Y_ZdTBCPDUc

Jes'Fuchinwitcha » 07 Mar 2023, 8:26 am » wrote: ↑

07 Mar 2023, 8:26 am

Interesting... so some Capitol police are culpable, too?

The investigations and court proceedings should be very fertile ground for some fantastic arguing!

Let the games begin!

I am so mad that the capitol police were conducting guided tours with out using any tour guide union workers.   No wonder the Democrats are so mad.   
 

roadkill » 07 Mar 2023, 10:00 am » wrote: ↑

07 Mar 2023, 10:00 am

Hey Jes...why not just admit it. Yer either ignorant about J6 or you love the lies of the dems.  Come on Jes, the truth will set you free.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_s_2dnJ8tLs

They were most certainly armed. Every single one of them had arms attached to their shoulders and those are the worst type of insurrectionists.   

RayJJohnson » 08 Mar 2023, 10:23 am » wrote: ↑

08 Mar 2023, 10:23 am

They were most certainly armed. Every single one of them had arms attached to their shoulders and those are the worst type of insurrectionists. 

I know...right.   lol

POM » 08 Mar 2023, 10:10 am » wrote: ↑

08 Mar 2023, 10:10 am

my grass speaks 6 languages fluently.

 


My grass mows itself.   

slideman » 07 Mar 2023, 10:10 am » wrote: ↑

07 Mar 2023, 10:10 am

So explain to me how all the vandalism got done and how a hundred officers got injured.

Two things can be true. There were people just going into the capitol building because they could and there were people who damaged it out of anger. This is why some do  need to be charged with vandalism and trespassing. The vast majority were basically part of a wondering herd. 

Sorry but there was no insurrection on January 6th. There was a riot with some of the protestors but it wasn't what the Democrats were saying it was. 
 

roadkill » 08 Mar 2023, 10:26 am » wrote: ↑

08 Mar 2023, 10:26 am

 

My grass mows itself.

my grass mows and cleans up the clippings itself.