mainbitch in inventing "facts" again because he knows he's wrong.maineman » 07 Mar 2023, 11:49 pm » wrote: ↑ @golfboy must be too busy sexually abusing Mexican second graders to bother wiping the **** off his face.
LEO's are de facto authorized to use tear gas when their incident commander issues them canisters of it.
The video I showed you, shows the cops firing tear gas into peaceful protesters, who had a permit to be on the capitol grounds.maineman » 07 Mar 2023, 11:29 pm » wrote: ↑ So...according to Golfie, the lawyer.....LEO's on the scene do not have the authority to use tear gas on protesters if they determine they are less than peaceful?
And if they do, the citizens who are tear gassed are within their rights to attack the LEO's?
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WTdL5VtjbtYgolfboy » 09 Mar 2023, 6:27 pm » wrote: ↑ The video I showed you, shows the cops firing tear gas into peaceful protesters, who had a permit to be on the capitol grounds.
What excuse do you have for that?
golfboy » 09 Mar 2023, 6:27 pm » wrote: ↑ The video I showed you, shows the cops firing tear gas into peaceful protesters, who had a permit to be on the capitol grounds.
What excuse do you have for that?
Jantje_Smit » 09 Mar 2023, 11:26 am » wrote: ↑ This is a nice one... an insurrection with a guided tour... lol...
![]()
https://youtu.be/zXFg13VunKM
Trumprules » 09 Mar 2023, 6:31 pm » wrote: ↑ So which republican that testified lied in the hearings?
Your video was the only evidence available? Or all that YOU have? You don't think that, maybe, that the authorities determined that the actual situation wasn't completely portrayed in video?golfboy » 09 Mar 2023, 6:27 pm » wrote: ↑ The video I showed you, shows the cops firing tear gas into peaceful protesters, who had a permit to be on the capitol grounds.
What excuse do you have for that?
The video is clear. And no one in authority has bothered to even address the fact that the cops initiated the violence.maineman » 09 Mar 2023, 6:37 pm » wrote: ↑ Your video was the only evidence available? Or all that YOU have? You don't think that, maybe, that the authorities determined that the actual situation wasn't completely portrayed in video?
The video is one perspective... you, I guess, are unaware if any other footage is available.golfboy » 09 Mar 2023, 6:40 pm » wrote: ↑ The video is clear. And no one in authority has bothered to even address the fact that the cops initiated the violence.
duckie sucks homo dick... by his own admission!!!!
No one, not even Tucker has gone full cnn and said the riot was peaceful. Obviously there was violence, Obviously there was destruction of property. What was largely hidden from the public at large was the footage of protesters staying between velvet ropes and the face of the plansurrection being given a guided tour by Capitol Police before giving a prayer thanking the cops for their humane treatment.maineman » 09 Mar 2023, 6:37 pm » wrote: ↑ Your video was the only evidence available? Or all that YOU have? You don't think that, maybe, that the authorities determined that the actual situation wasn't completely portrayed in video?
Does that apply to the 785 blm riots or just conservatives entrapped into a photo op at the Capitol?maineman » 09 Mar 2023, 6:46 pm » wrote: ↑ The video is one perspective... you, I guess, are unaware if any other footage is available.
And I notice that the video does not have any audio with it, and there very well may have been audio triggers that prompted the deployment of non-lethal tear gas. AND AGAIN... a large unruly crowd, pressing against police barriers... and they get TEAR GASSED and get all butt hurt by it? Don't want to get tear gassed? Don't participate in an angry mob storming the capitol!
Show me more footage of the same event, showing I'm wrong.maineman » 09 Mar 2023, 6:46 pm » wrote: ↑ The video is one perspective... you, I guess, are unaware if any other footage is available.
And I notice that the video does not have any audio with it, and there very well may have been audio triggers that prompted the deployment of non-lethal tear gas. AND AGAIN... a large unruly crowd, pressing against police barriers... and they get TEAR GASSED and get all butt hurt by it? Don't want to get tear gassed? Don't participate in an angry mob storming the capitol!
He has Tucker Derangement Syndrome
I have never condoned violence as a means of social protest.Neo » 09 Mar 2023, 6:49 pm » wrote: ↑ Does that apply to the 785 blm riots or just conservatives entrapped into a photo op at the Capitol?
Never. I just see a distinct difference in the reporting.maineman » 09 Mar 2023, 6:51 pm » wrote: ↑ I have never condoned violence as a means of social protest.
Obviously, you have.
But.... we both know you did.FJB » 09 Mar 2023, 6:50 pm » wrote: ↑ says you... yet you can't prove I said it. All you libtards have is lying.