maybe because the intent of the violence was qualitatively different.
You claim that. But I actually know you are talking about a certain skank ada or former ada.maineman » 09 Mar 2023, 6:56 pm » wrote: ↑ But.... we both know you did.
You claimed that drove all the way to Maine YEARS ago to suck a Maine homo lawyer's cock on the surf line of Ogunguit. You admitted it was your first experience with oral sex and you admitted that, although you enjoyed the experience, you didn't really like the taste of semen. YOU said that on the dot org site and several members who have migrated here vividly remember your posts about it.
Violence to advance a political agenda is violence to advance a political agenda. Just because you believe the false claim of blm doesn't make the violence more justified than the j6 idiots.maineman » 09 Mar 2023, 7:00 pm » wrote: ↑ maybe because the intent of the violence was qualitatively different.
BLM protests were aimed at raising public awareness of the inequity of police violence against black Americans...
January 6th was aimed at overthrowing our constitutional government.
But, since you don't care about the former and support the latter, your viewpoint is similarly skewed.
Like seafood dipped chicken I would guess.
I never said it was more justified... just less damaging to the life of our democracyNeo » 09 Mar 2023, 7:04 pm » wrote: ↑ Violence to advance a political agenda is violence to advance a political agenda. Just because you believe the false claim of blm doesn't make the violence more justified than the j6 idiots.
you said you had visited Maine YEARS ago. Your own timeline betrays you.FJB » 09 Mar 2023, 7:02 pm » wrote: ↑ You claim that. But I actually know you are talking about a certain skank ada or former ada.
Our democracy is we the people. Not a building, not a group of representatives. Our democracy was under no threat.maineman » 09 Mar 2023, 7:10 pm » wrote: ↑ I never said it was more justified... just less damaging to the life of our democracy
Anyone else struck by the irony of one of THESE queers complaining about the use of the word peaceful?maineman » 07 Mar 2023, 9:45 pm » wrote: ↑ completely "peaceful" except all of those folks were "peacefully" gathered inside police perimeters they had already "peacefully" breached. The security perimeter was already broken down and swarmed over by the "peaceful" protesters and the capitol police already knew they were totally outnumbered.
And you'd think you would have heard at least ONE chorus of Kumbaya floating above the crowd if "peace" was really their agenda, eh?
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
You claim that chinkmaineman » 09 Mar 2023, 7:14 pm » wrote: ↑ you said you had visited Maine YEARS ago. Your own timeline betrays you.
How so, fruity?maineman » 09 Mar 2023, 7:10 pm » wrote: ↑ I never said it was more justified... just less damaging to the life of our democracy
the january 6th insurrectionists sought to stop the constitutional transfer of power and hang the vice president. They succeeded in delaying the transfer and, were dangerously close to capturing the vice president. Our democracy was MOST DEFINITELY under threat. To suggest otherwise is to, quite literally, condone the storming of the capitol as an inconsequential event.Neo » 09 Mar 2023, 7:16 pm » wrote: ↑ Our democracy is we the people. Not a building, not a group of representatives. Our democracy was under no threat.
YOU were the one happy when only one narrative was available, and video showing other angles was censored from public view, even though that video is PUBLIC PROPERTY, bought and paid for by public monies.maineman » 09 Mar 2023, 6:46 pm » wrote: ↑ The video is one perspective... you, I guess, are unaware if any other footage is available.
I'll just tell you this once:Cannonpointer » 09 Mar 2023, 7:22 pm » wrote: ↑ How so, fruity?
They killed more people, killed more cops, burned more government building, destroyed more historical places, killed more dreams, destroyed more businesses - how is that LESS damaging to the life of our REPUBLIC, civics-challenged moron?
If you have to lie, it proves the weakness of your argument.
The guy with the Horned hat calmly & jovially walking down the halls with the Cops was probably the most surprising revelation to me... Especially given how the hysterical Democrats and their friends in the MSM portrayed this man as leading some frenzied Banzai charge -- mowing down Police, and anyone in his way.... The Left's answer to this is that Police were afraid to antagonize him, as they were so severely outnumbered --- but the footage shows him by himself, only with Police walking alongside him.. At one point, he walks into a group of about 8 Cops in the Senate hallway, and again no one impedes or detains him...Neo » 09 Mar 2023, 6:47 pm » wrote: ↑ No one, not even Tucker has gone full cnn and said the riot was peaceful. Obviously there was violence, Obviously there was destruction of property. What was largely hidden from the public at large was the footage of protesters staying between velvet ropes and the face of the plansurrection being given a guided tour by Capitol Police before giving a prayer thanking the cops for their humane treatment.
I don't care if an ant climbs the leg of an elephant with rape on its mind. Intent without capability is pretty **** meaningless.maineman » 09 Mar 2023, 7:23 pm » wrote: ↑ the january 6th insurrectionists sought to stop the constitutional transfer of power and hang the vice president. They succeeded in delaying the transfer and, were dangerously close to capturing the vice president. Our democracy was MOST DEFINITELY under threat. To suggest otherwise is to, quite literally, condone the storming of the capitol as an inconsequential event.
Not one, but TWO impossible asks?maineman » 09 Mar 2023, 7:25 pm » wrote: ↑ I'll just tell you this once:
When you change my avatar back to the way it was before, and you quit tossing homophobic slurs at me, I will not respond to your posts.
period.
carriage return.
I had seen hundreds of pictures of protesters staying between velvet ropes so that footage wasn't surprising. The Q-ANON Sharman footage was damning. He was given a guided tour for which he later thanked God for, for anyone believing the new narrative that these cops were escorting him out of the building. He obviously made that prayer after the guided tour.Kobia2 » 09 Mar 2023, 7:27 pm » wrote: ↑ The guy with the Horned hat calmly & jovially walking down the halls with the Cops was probably the most surprising revelation to me... Especially given how the hysterical Democrats and their friends in the MSM portrayed this man as leading some frenzied Banzai charge -- mowing down Police, and anyone in his way.... The Left's answer to this is that Police were afraid to antagonize him, as they were so severely outnumbered --- but the footage shows him by himself, only with Police walking alongside him.. At one point, he walks into a group of about 8 Cops in the Senate hallway, and again no one impedes or detains him...
You sound like a hysterical little girl who just soiled her bloomers.....for God's sake, act like a man.maineman » 09 Mar 2023, 7:23 pm » wrote: ↑ the january 6th insurrectionists sought to stop the constitutional transfer of power and hang the vice president. They succeeded in delaying the transfer and, were dangerously close to capturing the vice president. Our democracy was MOST DEFINITELY under threat. To suggest otherwise is to, quite literally, condone the storming of the capitol as an inconsequential event.