Why me? YOU are the dick-flasher.RedheadedStranger » 08 Mar 2023, 6:53 pm » wrote: ↑ I'm not talking about the books... I'm talking about you.
Cannonpointer » 08 Mar 2023, 9:52 pm » wrote: ↑ A stage yawn ^ - one of the oldest "bottom gay" signals at the truck stop.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom Sure...
Xavier_Onassis » 05 Mar 2023, 1:49 pm » wrote: ↑ Just showing children his dick isn't hurting anyone. It's obvious he's only having some fun.
Don't get mad at me.Xavier_Onassis » 09 Mar 2023, 10:23 am » wrote: ↑ You really need to **** off. asshole. You are just making a total fool of yourself.
can you explain this?Xavier_Onassis » 09 Mar 2023, 10:57 am » wrote: ↑ You are an annoying waste of time. Go **** yourself. Quietly.

You didn't address the issue at hand. You avoided it and cried about DeSantis because he does not agree with you politically. You would RATHER pornography be shown to little boys and girls provided DeSantis is made to look bad and all because you disagree. That makes you a HORRIBLE person.Xavier_Onassis » 08 Mar 2023, 6:32 pm » wrote: ↑ Why don't you post this horrible smut so we can see why you have your bowels in such an uproar about it?
DeSantis is a posturing dick, posing as a Big Swinging Dick.
He is a nasty angry little man with an annoying whiny voice and the charisma of a bufo toad.
What are they "canceling," fruitcake? Books that are not age appropriate - books that CANNOT BE READ IN PUBLIC MEETINGS DUE TO THE FILTH OF THE TEXTS?Trumprules » 08 Mar 2023, 11:41 pm » wrote: ↑ Remember when the right wing said they were against cancel culture. I do but now I know it's a right wing lie.
It has been pointed out to you REPEATEDLY, in this thread, that the refusal of the media to report on it and the refusal of school boards to allow its public reading is evidence, you weak piece of ****.Xavier_Onassis » 09 Mar 2023, 12:58 pm » wrote: ↑ I have ZERO evidence that any pornography was shown to anyone.
Right GROOMER!!!Xavier_Onassis » 09 Mar 2023, 12:58 pm » wrote: ↑ I have ZERO evidence that any pornography was shown to anyone. I am aware that a photo of a female nipple is never shown on TV news shows.
You are a horrible piece of reeking ****. You are only a stupid and ignorant RWNJ troll and should go **** yourself in the butt with a pine cone or perhaps a pineapple or maybe even a taxidermied porcupine.
Unlike Pedo Peter, his own children do not complain of his pederasty, getting off into dope and broken lives as a result of being raised by a toucher.Skans » 09 Mar 2023, 9:07 am » wrote: ↑ You support pedophilia and pedophiles. You might not like DeSantis, but normal people consider that a good thing. Because if you did like DeSantis, then there would be a good chance that he molested his 10 year old daughter when taking showers with her. Thank God that's not the case.
What you describe is not evidence of anything.Cannonpointer » 09 Mar 2023, 1:58 pm » wrote: ↑ It has been pointed out to you REPEATEDLY, in this thread, that the refusal of the media to report on it and the refusal of school boards to allow its public reading is evidence, you weak piece of ****.
Repeating that you have zero evidence does not address the evidence. Address the evidence.
Do it.
Wait, wait, wait. Let me get this straight. You NOW insist in the most emphatic terms that you had no **** idea what you were crying about - that there may or may not have been pornographic materials presented to children, so far as you know? And it bothered you that they were being protected?Xavier_Onassis » 09 Mar 2023, 2:30 pm » wrote: ↑ What you describe is not evidence of anything.
No one in this forum has actually SEEN what you imbeciles are describing as pornography, but the reality is that the media has a specified list of visuals they cannot show. One is a female nipple. All men have nipples, and they can be indistinguishable from female nipples.
Did NOT stop you from screeching and running your dick kisser, groomer ***.Xavier_Onassis » 09 Mar 2023, 2:30 pm » wrote: ↑ I have no idea what is was that DeSantis saw or claims that he saw,
Not liking his base is not an excuse for defending grooming, piece of ****.Xavier_Onassis » 09 Mar 2023, 2:30 pm » wrote: ↑but I do not trust Desantis about anything. He is using culture wars to gain support among the more stupid people of Florida.
Yeah, queer, we know - yes to groomers.Xavier_Onassis » 09 Mar 2023, 2:30 pm » wrote: ↑ do I control what the media shows? I do not. I have not attended a school board meeting for decades, and all I have to do with them is elects members, which I do based on what I have read about those running.
None in the clip above, either, by a groomer's definition, pederast.Xavier_Onassis » 09 Mar 2023, 2:30 pm » wrote: ↑ And you imbeciles claim that DeSantis is preventing children from seeing PORNOGRAPHY. Not even DeSantis has used that term.
There is no evidence here of anything.
Here is some more evidence for you to NOT EVER SEE, groomer.