I quoted your response.
They are backfiring ....and epically...Blackvegetable » 09 Dec 2024, 9:02 am » wrote: ↑ Conviction and judgments are not "backfiring"....they are the consequences of Due Process. And constitute the ultimate validation of the prosecutions.
Aint that what internet supposed be about.*Huey » 09 Dec 2024, 9:14 am » wrote: ↑ I already answered. We are not playing your word and control games.
Day20ProjectoLass, please...*Huey » 09 Dec 2024, 9:14 am » wrote: ↑ I already answered. We are not playing your word and control games.
Prodject 2025 is that what ya refering too.
**** that *******.TwoIfByTea » 09 Dec 2024, 9:40 am » wrote: ↑ Prodject 2025 is that what ya refering too.
Democrats & Liberals been so "ignorant" pissed so many people off that I think Donald Trump 2nd term cabinent gonna live up 2 the task.
Remember 2016/2020 1st term he appointed allotta "Establishment" Snakes on a Good Word or towing the "Party Line" he was "Fooled"
Today hes pissed "Biggly" and only wants "Hardliners" Loyal & actually dismantle The DEEP STATE Too
I still hate his views on Fed Reserve, Money, Interest Rates.
But damn it the Enviromentalists , Racial folks & the Gays trannies need 2 smacked back afew notches really hard like a concussion maybe a coma because they that IGNORANT & Im sorry this is "Our Nation" not yours
You REFUSE to accept a JURY'S VERDICT, ASSHOLE!!Blackvegetable » 09 Dec 2024, 8:59 am » wrote: ↑ No, you didn't....you responded.
This about the jury's finding.
And the last word on that subject is the Judge's.
Nod.
Be quiet, idiot.*Beekeeper » 09 Dec 2024, 9:49 am » wrote: ↑ You REFUSE to accept a JURY'S VERDICT, ASSHOLE!!
Let's try this AGAIN.........
https://www.politico.com/dims4/default/ ... 180432.png
A JUDGE cannot LEGALLY "interpret" a jury's verdict to the DEFENDENT'S DETRIMENT!! ONLY to his benefit.
And that in and of itself is MORE than grounds for APPEAL on ALL LEVELS!!
Sucks you know so damn little about how the LAW actually works but have this anal-retentive belief that YOU are right, and all LEGAL EXPERTS are wrong.
I don't see a case*Huey » 09 Dec 2024, 10:24 am » wrote: ↑ https://www.politico.com/news/2023/05/0 ... l-00096059
Read question #1.
What ya gonna do about that.
Yawn.
Was Grifty promptly convicted by a jury on all 34 counts?
NOBlackvegetable » 09 Dec 2024, 11:00 am » wrote: ↑ Was Grifty promptly convicted by a jury on all 34 counts?
The real estate mogul, former commander-in-chief and presumptive Republican 2024 presidential nominee was found guilty on all counts Thursday by a jury of 12 Manhattanites in the unprecedented criminal prosecution of an ex-president.
Blackvegetable » 09 Dec 2024, 11:50 am » wrote: ↑ The real estate mogul, former commander-in-chief and presumptive Republican 2024 presidential nominee was found guilty on all counts Thursday by a jury of 12 Manhattanites in the unprecedented criminal prosecution of an ex-president.
The bombshell verdict was read in Manhattan Supreme Court just after 5 p.m. following nearly 12 hours of deliberations spread over two days
ibid.
"**** YOU CHILD"