Between whiners and those like you lost in self deception, where will this species go when all realities collapse at at the same time? That is what is happening globally here.Blackvegetable » 10 Mar 2023, 7:39 am » wrote: ↑ But, you suck at it.
Which is why you spend most of your time whining....
That doesn't matter.Blackvegetable » 10 Mar 2023, 7:41 am » wrote: ↑ Why don't you try to prosecute the argument that any of these videos exculpate Chansley...
You can't.RedheadedStranger » 10 Mar 2023, 7:48 am » wrote: ↑ That doesn't matter.
What does matter is the our Federal Govt intentionally withheld evidence and took away a citizens freedom in doing so.
Chansley should be freed and all charges dropped based on that fact alone.
Unlike you, I have a problem with the DOJ tossing due process out on it's ear for political expediency.
How about you address the points I made in my reply instead of repeating your CNN talking points.Blackvegetable » 10 Mar 2023, 7:51 am » wrote: ↑ You can't.
There were no videos withheld by the prosecution....the videos Tucker is showing don't exonerate Chansley, they are unambiguous evidence of the crimes to which he pleaded guilty.
You're a **** rube.
ha ha ha ha ha ha great diversion, "No evidence withheld by the prosecution.". that is funny as hell coming back at the prosecution team and their supporters.Blackvegetable » 10 Mar 2023, 7:51 am » wrote: ↑ You can't.
There were no videos withheld by the prosecution....the videos Tucker is showing don't exonerate Chansley, they are unambiguous evidence of the crimes to which he pleaded guilty.
You're a **** rube.
Those are the facts.RedheadedStranger » 10 Mar 2023, 7:57 am » wrote: ↑ How about you address the points I made in my reply instead of repeating your CNN talking points.
Oh wait... you can't.
They are no longer "Democrats". They have become the resurrection of the NAZIS incarnate. Totally.roadkill » 10 Mar 2023, 3:31 am » wrote: ↑ Or as Senator Kennedy put it, "The Biden Administration Sucks".
This is the most disgusting democrat party I've ever seen in my life.
You still making that CLAIM after I KICKED YOUR ARSE ON ANOTHER THREAD?? EVEN AFTER SHOWING YOU THE ACTUAL INDICTMENT WITH THE US CODE VIOLATIONS THEY CLAIMED HE COMMITTED THAT WERE VIOLENT BY DEFINITION???Blackvegetable » 10 Mar 2023, 8:26 am » wrote: ↑ If you want to claim they show Chansley wasn't violent, knock yourself out.
He wasn't charged with any crimes of violence.
Dude,Beekeeper » 10 Mar 2023, 8:30 am » wrote: ↑ You still making that CLAIM after I KICKED YOUR ARSE ON ANOTHER THREAD?? EVEN AFTER SHOWING YOU THE ACTUAL INDICTMENT WITH THE US CODE VIOLATIONS THEY CLAIMED HE COMMITTED THAT WERE VIOLENT BY DEFINITION???
Dang, grl, you need to change your panties.
Maybe one day we can get a fair and just President like the residents of Florida enjoy with their Governor.Kobia2 » 10 Mar 2023, 2:32 am » wrote: ↑ This is one of the most disturbing parts of this man's story... The FBI had this video footage... They knew he was innocent of what he'd been charged with... Liz Cheney and Adam Schiff also knew, and they gladly sent this man to prison based on outrageous lies... His defense Lawyer had him sign a horrible Plea Agreement, which states he cannot appeal his sentence... He agreed to the plea for fear of getting a much longer sentence, not knowing that video of his movements which proved his claims of innocence existed and was being withheld from his defence....
And even though this colossal lie has been exposed, the Left STILL continues to repeat it..
LOCK HIM UP!Beekeeper » 10 Mar 2023, 8:28 am » wrote: ↑ They are no longer "Democrats". They have become the resurrection of the NAZIS incarnate. Totally.
Did I say anything about retrying Chansley?Blackvegetable » 10 Mar 2023, 8:26 am » wrote: ↑ Those are the facts.
You've offered no argument to accompany the videos.
If you want to claim they show Chansley wasn't violent, knock yourself out.
He wasn't charged with any crimes of violence.
Here we go again.RedheadedStranger » 10 Mar 2023, 8:33 am » wrote: ↑ Did I say anything about retrying Chansley?
No, I didn't, because that wasn't my point
If you would actually read passed the first line of my replies every once in a while you might have figured that out.
I accept your concession.
An ex-wife?
AS I TOLD YOU THEN AND WILL NOW, I AM NOT YOUR PERSONAL ASSISTANT!!!Blackvegetable » 10 Mar 2023, 8:32 am » wrote: ↑ Dude,
You lost.
You declined to cite the language in the charges referring to violence.
You may do so now..
Fondler,Beekeeper » 10 Mar 2023, 8:37 am » wrote: ↑ AS I TOLD YOU THEN AND WILL NOW, I AM NOT YOUR PERSONAL ASSISTANT!!!
YOU were given the LINK TO THE INDICTMENT and it CONTAINED the US CODE violations AS LISTED!!
LOOK THEM UP YOURSELF, and if you THINK you can, use them to "prove I am wrong", GO FOR IT!!
Since you limited 2 cell brain activity is incapable of such simple actions, you LOSE, DILLWEED!!
What, specifically, did I "concede", Sheilagh Too.
Your CONCESSION OF DEFEAT is accepted!!