and you need to just sit down and shut the **** up because EVERYBODY knows you are a cock sucking homo who is all talk and no action.
idiots are easily amused.
yup I see ya laughing
your reputation precedes you.
maineman » 11 Mar 2023, 8:19 pm » wrote: ↑ your reputation precedes you.
you are memorably laughable....
It wasn't any one moronic post that got me laughing.... it was your entire oeuvre. It's not EASY to slog through, but the overall impression is remarkably silly..... and worth a chuckle.
you get it.
woooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooomaineman » 11 Mar 2023, 8:21 pm » wrote: ↑ you get it.
you admit it, don't you?
you KNOW you're a lightweight chucklehead.
bravo zulu
That’s because the answer to gun violence is NOT violating law abiding citizens ability to own firearms.ScottMon » 11 Mar 2023, 7:45 am » wrote: ↑ I've made a lot of people mad because I pointed out that gun violence doesn't seem to be nearly as important to them as protesting drag readings with people willingly bringing their own children.
Jut your typical logical fallacy because they can't defend either argument.BlueDevil » 11 Mar 2023, 11:52 pm » wrote: ↑ That's what they don't get. They interpret our support for gun rights as siding with school shooters. We don't. We want them punished and children protected. They claim their desire to protect children but want them exposed to sexual deviants without any sort of parental knowledge.
MM did the least to deserve the stain he wears. He can wear it for his brethren. He can wear it for the children he lacks the balls to protect from predators. He's a piece of **** who is comfortable in a sewer.
The parents are the problem. They're intolerant. The kids need tolerance. Positive feedback. Gaslighting. Encouragement and protection in going against their parents' wishes.BlueDevil » 11 Mar 2023, 11:52 pm » wrote: ↑ That's what they don't get. They interpret our support for gun rights as siding with school shooters. We don't. We want them punished and children protected. They claim their desire to protect children but want them exposed to sexual deviants without any sort of parental knowledge.
Says the guy with the child groomer pedophile tag.

Oh.
Says the "Proud Navy Veteran" who's NEVER bragged about his service and the child groomer/pedophile tag.maineman » 11 Mar 2023, 7:27 pm » wrote: ↑ I was having dinner, she was a waitress. We struck up a conversation. It was a totally normal way for couples to meet.
I realize that the only ****** you've ever gotten was from hookers you had to pay, but don't put that on me, you drunken stumblebum. YOU accused ME of stolen valor... I NEVER did that to you. YOU sit back and applaud while your fat nurse buddy calls MY wife a prostitute and an underage mail order bride.
GO
****
YOURSELF.
seriously. you are one of the most worthless pieces of **** I have ever run across on the internet.
Friend, I know that you've been threatened by my arch-rival, Phineas T. Peabody, hack attorney.Str8tEdge » 10 Mar 2023, 10:58 pm » wrote: ↑ If we ban all pedophiles and their supporters, will there be any Democrats or leftists left on the board?
2. Do you think @maineman ’s mail order bride was under age?
You need your better to point out trolling to you, ****.POM » 11 Mar 2023, 1:37 pm » wrote: ↑ @Cannonpointer is the following statement "trolling"?
"Just showing children his dick isn't hurting anyone. It's obvious he's only having some fun. "
Pastafarian » 12 Mar 2023, 6:23 am » wrote: ↑ You need your better to point out trolling to you, ****.
It’s a troll and dripping with sarcasm, you retard.