NOTICE OF DUTY TO PRESERVE EVIDENCE
By Phelix_Dacat
11 Mar 2023 2:16 pm in Peanut Gallery
11 Mar 2023 2:16 pm
Re: NOTICE OF DUTY TO PRESERVE EVIDENCE
Dear (including but not limited to)
@admin
@GeorgeWashington
@Cannonpointer
@Deezer Shoove
@Annoyed Liberall
@Nobody AKA Misty
@Jinn Martini
and any other owner, moderator past or present, or financial supporter, as well as (including but not limited to)
@POM
@SJConspirator
@RebelGator
@Str8tEdge
@Warcok
and any other member of the site who has affirmed the libel of, including but not limited to,
@Blackvegetable
@nuckin futz
@Xavier_Onassis
@Ike Bana
@B.See
@ScottMon
@Pastafarian
@maineman
@slideman
@supraTruth
@Squatchman
@Trumprules
@Phelix_Dacat
and any other member designated at anytime with the rank of "Child Groomer" or "Sexual Predator" or any combination of such libel.
Member(s) has/have filed or has/have threatened to file a lawsuit against the Liberalforum.net, it's owners, management, financial supporters, and other members on the site. The preservation of all documents will benefit your defense of the claim.
Pursuant to the rules of civil procedure, every party to a lawsuit has a duty to preserve all evidence which could be relevant to the suit. This includes the duty to preserve all electronic evidence, such as emails and posts discussing the incident or related to matters at issue in the suit.
This duty to preserve evidence is broad and extends to all documents, regardless of whether the document is stored electronically (such as email) or in hard-copy and regardless of the type of document. For example, reports, spreadsheets, photographs and videotapes are all considered documents that must be preserved. Furthermore, the duty to preserve this documentary evidence extends to all documents in existence as of the time you reasonably anticipated this litigation.
To ensure that all relevant documents are preserved, you should communicate directly with all persons who have possession or control of potentially relevant evidence, including but not limited to people who deal with email and post retention, deletion, and archiving. You should advise each of these persons to preserve any relevant documents in their custody. Furthermore, you should advise all such persons that any regularly scheduled and/or automatic deletion of email or other electronic documents must be discontinued with respect to any relevant data. In addition, any document destruction (such as shredding of documents) must cease with respect to any relevant documents. All relevant documents, both electronic and paper, must be preserved for the duration of this litigation.
The statutes of limitations for defamation by libel vary. Consult with an attorney.
Dear (including but not limited to)
@admin
@GeorgeWashington
@Cannonpointer
@Deezer Shoove
@Annoyed Liberall
@Nobody AKA Misty
@Jinn Martini
and any other owner, moderator past or present, or financial supporter, as well as (including but not limited to)
@POM
@SJConspirator
@RebelGator
@Str8tEdge
@Warcok
and any other member of the site who has affirmed the libel of, including but not limited to,
@Blackvegetable
@nuckin futz
@Xavier_Onassis
@Ike Bana
@B.See
@ScottMon
@Pastafarian
@maineman
@slideman
@supraTruth
@Squatchman
@Trumprules
@Phelix_Dacat
and any other member designated at anytime with the rank of "Child Groomer" or "Sexual Predator" or any combination of such libel.
Member(s) has/have filed or has/have threatened to file a lawsuit against the Liberalforum.net, it's owners, management, financial supporters, and other members on the site. The preservation of all documents will benefit your defense of the claim.
Pursuant to the rules of civil procedure, every party to a lawsuit has a duty to preserve all evidence which could be relevant to the suit. This includes the duty to preserve all electronic evidence, such as emails and posts discussing the incident or related to matters at issue in the suit.
This duty to preserve evidence is broad and extends to all documents, regardless of whether the document is stored electronically (such as email) or in hard-copy and regardless of the type of document. For example, reports, spreadsheets, photographs and videotapes are all considered documents that must be preserved. Furthermore, the duty to preserve this documentary evidence extends to all documents in existence as of the time you reasonably anticipated this litigation.
To ensure that all relevant documents are preserved, you should communicate directly with all persons who have possession or control of potentially relevant evidence, including but not limited to people who deal with email and post retention, deletion, and archiving. You should advise each of these persons to preserve any relevant documents in their custody. Furthermore, you should advise all such persons that any regularly scheduled and/or automatic deletion of email or other electronic documents must be discontinued with respect to any relevant data. In addition, any document destruction (such as shredding of documents) must cease with respect to any relevant documents. All relevant documents, both electronic and paper, must be preserved for the duration of this litigation.
The statutes of limitations for defamation by libel vary. Consult with an attorney.
11 Mar 2023 2:23 pm
11 Mar 2023 2:30 pm
Phelix_Dacat » 11 Mar 2023, 3:16 pm » wrote: ↑ Re: NOTICE OF DUTY TO PRESERVE EVIDENCE
Dear (including but not limited to)
@admin
@GeorgeWashington
@Cannonpointer
@Deezer Shoove
@Annoyed Liberall
@Nobody AKA Misty
@Jinn Martini
and any other owner, moderator past or present, or financial supporter, as well as (including but not limited to)
@POM
@SJConspirator
@RebelGator
@Str8tEdge
@Warcok
and any other member of the site who has affirmed the libel of, including but not limited to,
@Blackvegetable
@nuckin futz
@Xavier_Onassis
@Ike Bana
@B.See
@ScottMon
@Pastafarian
@maineman
@slideman
@supraTruth
@Squatchman
@Trumprules
@Phelix_Dacat
and any other member designated at anytime with the rank of "Child Groomer" or "Sexual Predator" or any combination of such libel.
Member(s) has/have filed or has/have threatened to file a lawsuit against the Liberalforum.net, it's owners, management, financial supporters, and other members on the site. The preservation of all documents will benefit your defense of the claim.
Pursuant to the rules of civil procedure, every party to a lawsuit has a duty to preserve all evidence which could be relevant to the suit. This includes the duty to preserve all electronic evidence, such as emails and posts discussing the incident or related to matters at issue in the suit.
This duty to preserve evidence is broad and extends to all documents, regardless of whether the document is stored electronically (such as email) or in hard-copy and regardless of the type of document. For example, reports, spreadsheets, photographs and videotapes are all considered documents that must be preserved. Furthermore, the duty to preserve this documentary evidence extends to all documents in existence as of the time you reasonably anticipated this litigation.
To ensure that all relevant documents are preserved, you should communicate directly with all persons who have possession or control of potentially relevant evidence, including but not limited to people who deal with email and post retention, deletion, and archiving. You should advise each of these persons to preserve any relevant documents in their custody. Furthermore, you should advise all such persons that any regularly scheduled and/or automatic deletion of email or other electronic documents must be discontinued with respect to any relevant data. In addition, any document destruction (such as shredding of documents) must cease with respect to any relevant documents. All relevant documents, both electronic and paper, must be preserved for the duration of this litigation.
The statutes of limitations for defamation by libel vary. Consult with an attorney.
What we have here is first rate sh.it stirring. Damn fine job sir
11 Mar 2023 2:33 pm
Phelix_Dacat » 11 Mar 2023, 3:16 pm » wrote: ↑ Re: NOTICE OF DUTY TO PRESERVE EVIDENCE
Dear (including but not limited to)
@admin
@GeorgeWashington
@Cannonpointer
@Deezer Shoove
@Annoyed Liberall
@Nobody AKA Misty
@Jinn Martini
and any other owner, moderator past or present, or financial supporter, as well as (including but not limited to)
@POM
@SJConspirator
@RebelGator
@Str8tEdge
@Warcok
and any other member of the site who has affirmed the libel of, including but not limited to,
@Blackvegetable
@nuckin futz
@Xavier_Onassis
@Ike Bana
@B.See
@ScottMon
@Pastafarian
@maineman
@slideman
@supraTruth
@Squatchman
@Trumprules
@Phelix_Dacat
and any other member designated at anytime with the rank of "Child Groomer" or "Sexual Predator" or any combination of such libel.
Member(s) has/have filed or has/have threatened to file a lawsuit against the Liberalforum.net, it's owners, management, financial supporters, and other members on the site. The preservation of all documents will benefit your defense of the claim.
Pursuant to the rules of civil procedure, every party to a lawsuit has a duty to preserve all evidence which could be relevant to the suit. This includes the duty to preserve all electronic evidence, such as emails and posts discussing the incident or related to matters at issue in the suit.
This duty to preserve evidence is broad and extends to all documents, regardless of whether the document is stored electronically (such as email) or in hard-copy and regardless of the type of document. For example, reports,and videotapes are all considered documents that must be preserved. Furthermore, the duty to preserve this documentary evidence extends to all documents in existence as of the time you reasonably anticipated this litigation.
To ensure that all relevant documents are preserved, you should communicate directly with all persons who have possession or control of potentially relevant evidence, including but not limited to people who deal with email and post. You should advise these persons to preserve any relevant documents in their custody. Furthermore, you should advise all such persons that any automatic deletion of email or other electronic documents must be discontinued with respect to any relevant data.
The statutes of limitations for defamation by libel vary. Consult with an attorney.
11 Mar 2023 2:56 pm
Oh ****... I just cleaned my cookies.
Do y'all think I need to contact my attorney?
Do y'all think I need to contact my attorney?
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
11 Mar 2023 3:24 pm
11 Mar 2023 5:05 pm
Who's a big boy?Phelix_Dacat » 11 Mar 2023, 3:16 pm » wrote: ↑ Re: NOTICE OF DUTY TO PRESERVE EVIDENCE
Dear (including but not limited to)
@admin
@GeorgeWashington
@Cannonpointer
@Deezer Shoove
@Annoyed Liberall
@Nobody AKA Misty
@Jinn Martini
and any other owner, moderator past or present, or financial supporter, as well as (including but not limited to)
@POM
@SJConspirator
@RebelGator
@Str8tEdge
@Warcok
and any other member of the site who has affirmed the libel of, including but not limited to,
@Blackvegetable
@nuckin futz
@Xavier_Onassis
@Ike Bana
@B.See
@ScottMon
@Pastafarian
@maineman
@slideman
@supraTruth
@Squatchman
@Trumprules
@Phelix_Dacat
and any other member designated at anytime with the rank of "Child Groomer" or "Sexual Predator" or any combination of such libel.
Member(s) has/have filed or has/have threatened to file a lawsuit against the Liberalforum.net, it's owners, management, financial supporters, and other members on the site. The preservation of all documents will benefit your defense of the claim.
Pursuant to the rules of civil procedure, every party to a lawsuit has a duty to preserve all evidence which could be relevant to the suit. This includes the duty to preserve all electronic evidence, such as emails and posts discussing the incident or related to matters at issue in the suit.
This duty to preserve evidence is broad and extends to all documents, regardless of whether the document is stored electronically (such as email) or in hard-copy and regardless of the type of document. For example, reports, spreadsheets, photographs and videotapes are all considered documents that must be preserved. Furthermore, the duty to preserve this documentary evidence extends to all documents in existence as of the time you reasonably anticipated this litigation.
To ensure that all relevant documents are preserved, you should communicate directly with all persons who have possession or control of potentially relevant evidence, including but not limited to people who deal with email and post retention, deletion, and archiving. You should advise each of these persons to preserve any relevant documents in their custody. Furthermore, you should advise all such persons that any regularly scheduled and/or automatic deletion of email or other electronic documents must be discontinued with respect to any relevant data. In addition, any document destruction (such as shredding of documents) must cease with respect to any relevant documents. All relevant documents, both electronic and paper, must be preserved for the duration of this litigation.
The statutes of limitations for defamation by libel vary. Consult with an attorney.
felix the rat is a big boy!
We're in trouble, now, fellas. Felix the rat is in the house!
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
11 Mar 2023 5:08 pm
No matter what you do, you know what you will always be,,,,,Cannonpointer » 11 Mar 2023, 6:05 pm » wrote: ↑ Who's a big boy?
felix the rat is a big boy!
We're in trouble, now, fellas. Felix the rat is in the house!
11 Mar 2023 5:09 pm
A groomer destroyer, princess?Blackvegetable » 11 Mar 2023, 6:08 pm » wrote: ↑ No matter what you do, you know what you will always be,,,,,
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
11 Mar 2023 5:12 pm
He suffers from impotent rage - the funniest, most aromatic kind of rage.
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
11 Mar 2023 5:24 pm
Dear impotently enraged groomer:
We owe no duty of "fairness" to ANONYMOUS child groomers. No injury, no cause at law.
P.S. Being "miffed and peeved" is not an injury.
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
11 Mar 2023 5:25 pm
He’s not dead yet?Cannonpointer » 11 Mar 2023, 6:05 pm » wrote: ↑ Who's a big boy?
felix the rat is a big boy!
We're in trouble, now, fellas. Felix the rat is in the house!
11 Mar 2023 5:27 pm
Wait, he thinks he has a serious libel case?Cannonpointer » 11 Mar 2023, 6:05 pm » wrote: ↑ Who's a big boy?
felix the rat is a big boy!
We're in trouble, now, fellas. Felix the rat is in the house!
11 Mar 2023 5:28 pm
I **** you not - zer does.
Shim is not a regular, so a lot of you fellas don't know zbignew. But flarp is a MAJOR child danger. And flim doesn't take kindly to manliness.
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
11 Mar 2023 5:28 pm
Should my anonymous online persona retain the services of a lawyer?Cannonpointer » 11 Mar 2023, 6:05 pm » wrote: ↑ Who's a big boy?
felix the rat is a big boy!
We're in trouble, now, fellas. Felix the rat is in the house!
11 Mar 2023 5:29 pm
Cannonpointer » 11 Mar 2023, 6:24 pm » wrote: ↑ Dear impotently enraged groomer:
We owe no duty of "fairness" to ANONYMOUS child groomers. No injury, no cause at law.
P.S. Being "miffed and peeved" is not an injury.
Your honah, mah clients slideman and maineman have been grievously wounded by this heinous slandah!
Are those real people?
No your honah, they are handles on a internet for-
/SLAMS GAVEL. case dismissed
11 Mar 2023 5:30 pm
SJConspirator » 11 Mar 2023, 6:29 pm » wrote: ↑ Your honah, mah clients slideman and maineman have been grievously wounded by this heinous slandah!
Are those real people?
No your honah, they are handles on a internet for-
/SLAMS GAVEL. case dismissed
Nah, mizz felix - it IS "mizz" felix, is it not...
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
11 Mar 2023 5:31 pm
Funny you should ask, friend. Allow me to intrduce myself.Str8tEdge » 11 Mar 2023, 6:28 pm » wrote: ↑ Should my anonymous online persona retain the services of a lawyer?
Phineas T. Peabody, Internet Attorney at Law, at your service.
No case is too asinine, no cause too silly. I am eager to have your business!
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
11 Mar 2023 5:35 pm
You’re hired! Now I just need to get that 30k out of the sock and loan.Cannonpointer » 11 Mar 2023, 6:31 pm » wrote: ↑ Funny you should ask, friend. Allow me to intrduce myself.
Phineas T. Peabody, Internet Attorney at Law, at your service.
No case is too asinine, no cause too silly. I am eager to have your business!
11 Mar 2023 5:35 pm
Phelix_Dacat » 11 Mar 2023, 3:16 pm » wrote: ↑ Re: NOTICE OF DUTY TO PRESERVE EVIDENCE
Dear (including but not limited to)
@admin
@GeorgeWashington
@Cannonpointer
@Deezer Shoove
@Annoyed Liberall
@Nobody AKA Misty
@Jinn Martini
and any other owner, moderator past or present, or financial supporter, as well as (including but not limited to)
@POM
@SJConspirator
@RebelGator
@Str8tEdge
@Warcok
and any other member of the site who has affirmed the libel of, including but not limited to,
@Blackvegetable
@nuckin futz
@Xavier_Onassis
@Ike Bana
@B.See
@ScottMon
@Pastafarian
@maineman
@slideman
@supraTruth
@Squatchman
@Trumprules
@Phelix_Dacat
and any other member designated at anytime with the rank of "Child Groomer" or "Sexual Predator" or any combination of such libel.
Member(s) has/have filed or has/have threatened to file a lawsuit against the Liberalforum.net, it's owners, management, financial supporters, and other members on the site. The preservation of all documents will benefit your defense of the claim.
Pursuant to the rules of civil procedure, every party to a lawsuit has a duty to preserve all evidence which could be relevant to the suit. This includes the duty to preserve all electronic evidence, such as emails and posts discussing the incident or related to matters at issue in the suit.
This duty to preserve evidence is broad and extends to all documents, regardless of whether the document is stored electronically (such as email) or in hard-copy and regardless of the type of document. For example, reports, spreadsheets, photographs and videotapes are all considered documents that must be preserved. Furthermore, the duty to preserve this documentary evidence extends to all documents in existence as of the time you reasonably anticipated this litigation.
To ensure that all relevant documents are preserved, you should communicate directly with all persons who have possession or control of potentially relevant evidence, including but not limited to people who deal with email and post retention, deletion, and archiving. You should advise each of these persons to preserve any relevant documents in their custody. Furthermore, you should advise all such persons that any regularly scheduled and/or automatic deletion of email or other electronic documents must be discontinued with respect to any relevant data. In addition, any document destruction (such as shredding of documents) must cease with respect to any relevant documents. All relevant documents, both electronic and paper, must be preserved for the duration of this litigation.
The statutes of limitations for defamation by libel vary. Consult with an attorney.
Does this mean Biden will plead the 5th?
Who is online
In total there are 200 users online :: 20 registered, 15 bots, and 165 guests
Registered users: AtticusFinch, Mrkelly, Blackvegetable, Buck Naked, righteous, ROG62, ConservativeWave, FJB, Majik, jerra b, murdock, LowIQTrash, PhiloBeddo, Sumela, Cannonpointer, golfboy, Deezer Shoove, nefarious101, Str8tEdge, *Huey
Bots: ADmantX, YisouSpider, proximic, YandexBot, ALittle Client, Not, app.hypefactors.com, semantic-visions.com, Googlebot, Applebot, Mediapartners-Google, curl/7, linkfluence.com, oBot, bingbot