NOTICE OF DUTY TO PRESERVE EVIDENCE
By Phelix_Dacat
11 Mar 2023 2:16 pm in Peanut Gallery
11 Mar 2023 5:50 pm
I have to admit. This is some damn good trolling by Phelix. How can one not be impressed?
Retarded Horse's view on women.
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
- I LOVE IT WHEN A CRACK WHORE GETS BEAT UP Image
- I WANT TO WATCH YOU BEAT YOUR CRACK WHORE WIFE Image Image Image
- PUT THAT WIFE BEATER ON AND GET BUSY
11 Mar 2023 6:44 pm
Glad to be of serviceStr8tEdge » 11 Mar 2023, 6:35 pm » wrote: ↑ You’re hired! Now I just need to get that 30k out of the sock and loan.
Anyone else need a GREENIE loan for legal representation from Phineas T. Peabody, Internet Attorney at Law?
11 Mar 2023 6:54 pm
Thank you, sir! I promise I’m good for it!!!!SOCKSAVINGS » 11 Mar 2023, 7:44 pm » wrote: ↑ Glad to be of service
Anyone else need a GREENIE loan for legal representation from Phineas T. Peabody, Internet Attorney at Law?
Back one **** week and already named on a lawsuit…..
11 Mar 2023 6:55 pm
I've seen better from him. He does the whole "I've-had-enough/parental-figure-stepping-in-and-straightening-you-out" thing really well, in top form.Vegas » 11 Mar 2023, 6:50 pm » wrote: ↑ I have to admit. This is some damn good trolling by Phelix. How can one not be impressed?
I dunno if it's the contempt bred of familiarity or the contempt bred of his being an exposed groomer and pedophile, but I'm less impressed than I once was. Not saying it was a BAD attempt - just not worthy of a frame and a spot on a wall.
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
11 Mar 2023 6:59 pm
What will you do with your court winnings? Fix up your van?
11 Mar 2023 7:25 pm
Speak of the devil and he appears, sir. PM me for more information. You will not be charged unless you win.Phelix_Dacat » 11 Mar 2023, 3:16 pm » wrote: ↑ Re: NOTICE OF DUTY TO PRESERVE EVIDENCE
Consult with an attorney.
11 Mar 2023 8:29 pm
Cannonpointer » 11 Mar 2023, 7:55 pm » wrote: ↑ I've seen better from him. He does the whole "I've-had-enough-parental-figure-stepping-in-and-straightening-you-out" thing really well, in top form.
I dunno if it's the contempt bred of familiarity or the contempt bred of his being an exposed groomer and pedophile, but I'm less impressed than I once was. Not saying it was a BAD attempt - just not worthy of a frame and a spot on a wall.
It's telling that they are getting so uptight about it. If there wasn't some truth behind them being child groomers, then there would be no need to get so defensive. Almost all of the lefties here are up and arms about it. Misty, Scottsmon, and Phelix started threads over it. I have seen the others meltdown quite extensively, as well. When someone lies about me, I move on. I couldn't care less. If you put that on my profile, I genuinely wouldn't care. I would laugh, then move on. Their defensiveness speaks volumes.
Retarded Horse's view on women.
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
- I LOVE IT WHEN A CRACK WHORE GETS BEAT UP Image
- I WANT TO WATCH YOU BEAT YOUR CRACK WHORE WIFE Image Image Image
- PUT THAT WIFE BEATER ON AND GET BUSY
11 Mar 2023 9:12 pm
Great advice, Felix. I've already saved a bunch of evidence (via screenshots) and I agree, others whose profiles have been violated and manipulated by hostile administrator(s) here should do likewise.Phelix_Dacat » 11 Mar 2023, 3:16 pm » wrote: ↑ Re: NOTICE OF DUTY TO PRESERVE EVIDENCE
and any other member designated at anytime with the rank of "Child Groomer" or "Sexual Predator" or any combination of such libel.
Member(s) has/have filed or has/have threatened to file a lawsuit against the Liberalforum , it's owners, management, financial supporters, and other members on the site. The preservation of all documents will benefit your defense of the claim.
Pursuant to the rules of civil procedure, every party to a lawsuit has a duty to preserve all evidence which could be relevant to the suit. This includes the duty to preserve all electronic evidence, such as emails and posts discussing the incident or related to matters at issue in the suit.
This duty to preserve evidence is broad and extends to all documents, regardless of whether the document is stored electronically (such as email) or in hard-copy and regardless of the type of document. For example, reports, spreadsheets, photographs and videotapes are all considered documents that must be preserved. Furthermore, the duty to preserve this documentary evidence extends to all documents in existence as of the time you reasonably anticipated this litigation.
To ensure that all relevant documents are preserved, you should communicate directly with all persons who have possession or control of potentially relevant evidence, including but not limited to people who deal with email and post retention, deletion, and archiving. You should advise each of these persons to preserve any relevant documents in their custody. Furthermore, you should advise all such persons that any regularly scheduled and/or automatic deletion of email or other electronic documents must be discontinued with respect to any relevant data. In addition, any document destruction (such as shredding of documents) must cease with respect to any relevant documents. All relevant documents, both electronic and paper, must be preserved for the duration of this litigation.
The statutes of limitations for defamation by libel vary. Consult with an attorney.
By altering profiles as they have, their administrator(s) have fraudulently presented these profiles as something authored by the members themselves. Which is outright fraud, in addition to libel.
I'd also advise every member so maligned to report this forum as a hate group to civil rights and civil liberties agencies and organizations and to spread the word throughout the rest of the internet and put liberalforum on the national radar - via online forums, blogs, etc. as to what is going on here in this so-called "liberal" forum.
11 Mar 2023 9:20 pm
But... but...B.See » 11 Mar 2023, 10:12 pm » wrote: ↑ Great advice, Felix. I've already saved a bunch of evidence (via screenshots) and I agree, others whose profiles have been violated and manipulated by hostile administrator(s) here should do likewise.
By altering profiles as they have, their administrator(s) have fraudulently presented these profiles as something authored by the members themselves. Which is outright fraud, in addition to libel.
I'd also advise every member so maligned to report this forum as a hate group to civil rights and civil liberties agencies and organizations and to spread the word throughout the rest of the internet and put liberalforum on the national radar - via online forums, blogs, etc. as to what is going on here in this so-called "liberal" forum.
I thought you progressive types were all about letting privately owned social media platforms run them as they see fit?
No? Does that no longer apply?
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
11 Mar 2023 9:26 pm
“As they see fit” mean pushing forward the liberal agenda. Anything else is verboten,RedheadedStranger » 11 Mar 2023, 10:20 pm » wrote: ↑ But... but...
I thought you progressive types were all about letting privately owned social media platforms run them as they see fit?
No? Does that no longer apply?
BV sleep survey don't give a ****. viewtopic.php?p=2588518#p2588518
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV Absolves USSS: viewtopic.php?p=2585544#p2585544
The answer viewtopic.php?p=2573481#p2573481
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV Absolves USSS: viewtopic.php?p=2585544#p2585544
The answer viewtopic.php?p=2573481#p2573481
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
11 Mar 2023 9:29 pm
It certainly does seem to be a one way street with the "progressives".Huey » 11 Mar 2023, 10:26 pm » wrote: ↑ “As they see fit” mean pushing forward the liberal agenda. Anything else is verboten,
Just like that B.See character complaining about censorship, while blocking members he doesn't like and tossing any posts he doesn't approve of from his threads.
The hypocrisy of these people is amazing.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
11 Mar 2023 10:06 pm
Last time I looked, I didn't have the word "progressive" under my profile. But who knows? Maybe some bigoted ASSHOLE will chage that as well. And when have you EVER seen me advocate for a social media platforms like FUX and Elon's Twitter to shirk all responsibility and integrity by allowing for FRAUD, LIES, PROPAGANDA, AND HATE SPEECH, bubba?
Even NHB has (had?) a set of RULES, ese. And I played BY them, including the use of pg enabled threads. Why the **** HAVE THEM if the op can't establish rules for engagement? Each of my pg threads established criteria for participation at the very start (i.e. no hate speech, personal attacks, drive by **** posting, and other off topic TRASH), and those who were banned were banned for willfully and deliberately IGNORING THEM.RedheadedStranger » 11 Mar 2023, 10:29 pm » wrote: ↑ It certainly does seem to be a one way street with the "progressives".
Just like that B.See character complaining about censorship, while blocking members he doesn't like and tossing any posts he doesn't approve of from his threads.
The hypocrisy of these people is amazing.
Like how YOU chose to ignore the rules when YOU posted in the LIBERALS ONLY CHAT ROOM.
11 Mar 2023 10:22 pm
I wonder if he represented her with the alleged child abuse and divorce?Vegas » 11 Mar 2023, 6:50 pm » wrote: ↑ I have to admit. This is some damn good trolling by Phelix. How can one not be impressed?
11 Mar 2023 10:23 pm
Well, you just got added to the suit. Hahahahhahahahahahahahahahahha!!!!LincolnNebraska » 11 Mar 2023, 7:59 pm » wrote: ↑ What will you do with your court winnings? Fix up your van?
11 Mar 2023 10:25 pm
I’m surprised you think your threads deserve intellectual and respectful responses.B.See » 11 Mar 2023, 11:06 pm » wrote: ↑
Last time I looked, I didn't have the word "progressive" under my profile. But who knows? Maybe some bigoted ASSHOLE will chage that as well. And when have you EVER seen me advocate for a social media platforms like FUX and Elon's Twitter to shirk all responsibility and integrity by allowing for FRAUD, LIES, PROPAGANDA, AND HATE SPEECH, bubba?
Even NHB has (had?) a set of RULES, ese. And I played BY them, including the use of pg enabled threads. Why the **** HAVE THEM if the op can't establish rules for engagement? Each of my pg threads established criteria for participation at the very start (i.e. no hate speech, personal attacks, drive by **** posting, and other off topic TRASH), and those who were banned were banned for willfully and deliberately IGNORING THEM.
Like how YOU chose to ignore the rules when YOU posted in the LIBERALS ONLY CHAT ROOM.
They aren’t parody?
11 Mar 2023 10:25 pm
Every human being reflexively and instinctively protects children. It takes powerul cult programming and a desperate need for acceptance to weaken that natural instinct to the point that men dressed as hyper-sexualized female clowns can demand access to children as a moral imperative and expect to have them handed over by adults. It's a black stain on their weak souls that they have turned to putrid jelly on their fundamental, soul-deep duty to protect childen from overtly predatory perverts.Vegas » 11 Mar 2023, 9:29 pm » wrote: ↑ It's telling that they are getting so uptight about it. If there wasn't some truth behind them being child groomers, then there would be no need to get so defensive. Almost all of the lefties here are up and arms about it. Misty, Scottsmon, and Phelix started threads over it. I have seen the others meltdown quite extensively, as well. When someone lies about me, I move on. I couldn't care less. If you put that on my profile, I genuinely wouldn't care. I would laugh, then move on. Their defensiveness speaks volumes.
"We want access to your kids, to normalize with the innocent that which is not normal. We want to flounce and sashay in their presence - to be racy and overtly sexual in the presence of children, with our faces made up like maudlin circus actors - with horns on our heads and with enormous fake bosoms and with satanic symbolism dripping off of us. If you don't let us at them, then you are one of THOSE people - one of those religious kooks, one of the intolerant and uncool - now hand them over! HAND THEM OVER, or you are out of the cult and not allowed at the cool kids' table!"
At some level, they know they have sold their souls for a bowl of gruel. Hearing it will naturally threaten their cult identity - and look how much they have paid for that cult identity.
You can expect some gnashing of teeth - some outrage. "How DARE you call us on our ****? How DARE you make us look in the mirror? How DARE you remind us of the sacred duty that we have welched on?"
**** every one of them - and double **** their feelings. Whoever puts the wellbeing of children second to their ego is ****.
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
11 Mar 2023 10:29 pm
OMG that's funny. You'll be hearing from Phineas T. Peabody.LincolnNebraska » 11 Mar 2023, 7:59 pm » wrote: ↑ What will you do with your court winnings? Fix up your van?
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
11 Mar 2023 10:31 pm
You just made my point...B.See » 11 Mar 2023, 11:06 pm » wrote: ↑
Last time I looked, I didn't have the word "progressive" under my profile. But who knows? Maybe some bigoted ASSHOLE will chage that as well. And when have you EVER seen me advocate for a social media platforms like FUX and Elon's Twitter to shirk all responsibility and integrity by allowing for FRAUD, LIES, PROPAGANDA, AND HATE SPEECH, bubba?
The point still stands that you complain about the very same thing YOU engage in. You are whining about being restricted in what you can and can't do here, while banning and removing posts on nearly every thread you've ever created here via the peanut gallery.B.See » 11 Mar 2023, 11:06 pm » wrote: ↑
Even NHB has (had?) a set of RULES, ese. And I played BY them, including the use of pg enabled threads. Why the **** HAVE THEM if the op can't establish rules for engagement? Each of my pg threads established criteria for participation at the very start (i.e. no hate speech, personal attacks, drive by **** posting, and other off topic TRASH), and those who were banned were banned for willfully and deliberately IGNORING THEM.
Like how YOU chose to ignore the rules when YOU posted in the LIBERALS ONLY CHAT ROOM.
You're not "discussing" anything... you're posting a blog, and only allow people that nod along with your views to participate.
If that's not hypocrisy,I don't know what is.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
11 Mar 2023 10:33 pm
Not to mention, every post is a gish gallop. He's a worthless piece of **** and a child danger.RedheadedStranger » 11 Mar 2023, 11:31 pm » wrote: ↑ You just made my point...
The point still stands that you complain about the very same thing YOU engage in. You are whining about being restricted in what you can and can't do here, while banning and removing posts on nearly every thread you've ever created here via the peanut gallery.
You're not "discussing" anything... you're posting a blog, and only allow people that nod along with your views to participate.
If that's not hypocrisy,I don't know what is.
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
11 Mar 2023 10:35 pm
I consulted with an attorney. He said the statutes of your mother being a hor have no limit.Phelix_Dacat » 11 Mar 2023, 3:16 pm » wrote: ↑
The statutes of limitations for defamation by libel vary.
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
Who is online
In total there are 1132 users online :: 18 registered, 17 bots, and 1097 guests
Registered users: Deezer Shoove, Majik, Str8tEdge, Blackvegetable, Vegas, AtticusFinch, Cannonpointer, murdock, *Huey, righteous, golfboy, *GHETTO BLASTER, PhiloBeddo, FJB, Sumela, ROG62, ConsRule, Mrkelly
Bots: proximic, Not, trendictionbot, Feedfetcher-Google, CriteoBot, facebookexternalhit, ADmantX, app.hypefactors.com, YandexBot, Yahoo! Slurp, Mediapartners-Google, Applebot, Googlebot, semantic-visions.com, linkfluence.com, bingbot, curl/7