Yeah - TWITTER (which uses people's REAL, VERIFIED IDENTITIES) doesn't owe posters even-handed moderation - but at THIS anonymous backwater ****, by gum, everything had better be on the up and up! If not, God help us all, we'll ALL be hearing from the legendary Phineas T. Peabody, Esq., Attorney at Law, Internet Barrister Extraordinaire.Huey » 11 Mar 2023, 10:26 pm » wrote: ↑ “As they see fit” mean pushing forward the liberal agenda. Anything else is verboten,
I have no idea what he/she/it writes about as I have never read it's threads or posts.Cannonpointer » 11 Mar 2023, 11:33 pm » wrote: ↑ Not to mention, every post is a gish gallop. He's a worthless piece of **** and a child danger.
Good post, sir. I nominated it.Cannonpointer » 11 Mar 2023, 11:25 pm » wrote: ↑ Every human being reflexively and instinctively protects children. It takes powerul cult programming and a desperate need for acceptance to weaken that natural instinct to the point that men dressed as hyper-sexualized female clowns can demand access to children as a moral imperative and expect to have them handed over by adults. It's a black stain on their weak souls that they have turned to putrid jelly on their fundamental, soul-deep duty to protect childen from overtly predatory perverts.
"We want access to your kids, to normalize with the innocent that which is not normal. We want to flounce and sashay in their presence - to be racy and overtly sexual in the presence of children, with our faces made up like maudlin circus actors - with horns on our heads and with enormous fake bosoms and with satanic symbolism dripping off of us. If you don't let us at them, then you are one of THOSE people - one of those religious kooks, one of the intolerant and uncool - now hand them over! HAND THEM OVER, or you are out of the cult and not allowed at the cool kids' table!"
At some level, they know they have sold their souls for a bowl of gruel. Hearing it will naturally threaten their cult identity - and look how much they have paid for that cult identity.
You can expect some gnashing of teeth - some outrage. "How DARE you call us on our ****? How DARE you make us look in the mirror? How DARE you remind us of the sacred duty that we have welched on?"
**** every one of them - and double **** their feelings. Whoever puts the wellbeing of children second to their ego is ****.
THANK YOU.
That's like being in Congress and voting yourself a raise!Cannonpointer » 11 Mar 2023, 11:50 pm » wrote: ↑ THANK YOU.
I awarded it.
Conflict of interest? Just pretend I'm in the government.
How does an anonymous user on an interent forum have rights?Cannonpointer » 11 Mar 2023, 6:05 pm » wrote: ↑ Who's a big boy?
felix the rat is a big boy!
We're in trouble, now, fellas. Felix the rat is in the house!
More twisted "alternate realities" from the willfully delusional? Like how that election was "stolen" or those fkrs looking to hang the Vice President were "tourists"? Right. I noticed how you dodged my first question, champ.RedheadedStranger » 11 Mar 2023, 11:31 pm » wrote: ↑ You just made my point...
The point still stands that you complain about the very same thing YOU engage in. You are whining about being restricted in what you can and can't do here, while banning and removing posts on nearly every thread you've ever created here via the peanut gallery.
You're not "discussing" anything... you're posting a blog, and only allow people that nod along with your views to participate.
If that's not hypocrisy,I don't know what is.
How can you sit there and expect "discussions" when you clearly state "Discussions occur when people have something of value to respond to."B.See » 12 Mar 2023, 5:04 am » wrote: ↑ More twisted "alternate realities" from the willfully delusional? Like how that election was "stolen" or those fkrs looking to hang the Vice President were "tourists"? Right. I noticed how you dodged my first question, champ. And again, if they were banned or removed it was for willfully ignoring the parameters for posting in a pg thread. Contrary to your outright LIES, those who come to discuss and debate the topics remain, whether I agree with them or not. People who show up to flame and **** post do not. It's that simple. YOU haven't been banned from them, have you? The threads were CREATED for discussions. Not **** posts and personal attacks. Discussions occur when people have something of value to respond to. And if they choose to ignore the threads because either 1) they can't muster up a decent rebuttal or 2) the facts presented therein can't be disputed, then that's on them. New events, information, and development don't end just because YOU haven't the balls to PARTICIPATE. What am I to do. Post a new thread? Oh wait, I've BEEN BANNED FROM POSTING NEW THREADS... HYPOCRITE.
B.See » 12 Mar 2023, 5:04 am » wrote: ↑ More twisted "alternate realities" from the willfully delusional? Like how that election was "stolen" or those fkrs looking to hang the Vice President were "tourists"? Right. I noticed how you dodged my first question, champ. And again, if they were banned or removed it was for willfully ignoring the parameters for posting in a pg thread. Contrary to your outright LIES, those who come to discuss and debate the topics remain, whether I agree with them or not. People who show up to flame and **** post do not. It's that simple. YOU haven't been banned from them, have you? The threads were CREATED for discussions. Not **** posts and personal attacks. Discussions occur when people have something of value to respond to. And if they choose to ignore the threads because either 1) they can't muster up a decent rebuttal or 2) the facts presented therein can't be disputed, then that's on them. New events, information, and development don't end just because YOU haven't the balls to PARTICIPATE. What am I to do. Post a new thread? Oh wait, I've BEEN BANNED FROM POSTING NEW THREADS... HYPOCRITE.
\You're banned too!roadkill » 12 Mar 2023, 5:09 am » wrote: ↑ Yer a brainwashed fool B.See.
BTW Mr. Hypocrite, isn't yer type of post the reason you banned me and others from yer peanut gallery threads.
There's no coward like a far left coward like B.See.
I didn't flame and **** post you... well, not at first anyway.. lol... yet you still banned me from your peanut safe spaces.. simply because you couldn't prove me wrong... that makes you a coward and a hypocrite... and some other things too.. lol.. but let's not go there.. for now..B.See » 12 Mar 2023, 5:04 am » wrote: ↑
People who show up to flame and **** post do not. It's that simple. YOU haven't been banned from them, have you?
The threads were CREATED for discussions, BECAUSE of all the continuous right wingd pile-ons and **** posts you losers are famed for. .
NOT for **** posts and personal attacks.
And speaking of hypocrisy, funny how you and your bigot friends here want to take me to task for trying to create threads where topics are discussed minus the **** **** you gremlins typically employ..RedheadedStranger » 11 Mar 2023, 11:31 pm » wrote: ↑
You're not "discussing" anything... you're posting a blog, and only allow people that nod along with your views to participate.
If that's not hypocrisy,I don't know what is.
B.See » 12 Mar 2023, 5:33 am » wrote: ↑ And speaking of hypocrisy, funny how you and your bigot friends here want to take me to task for trying to create threads where topics are discussed minus the **** **** you gremlins typically employ..
But none of you have **** to say about how your fascist admin has branded just about every liberal here a "child groomer and sexual predator" including those who never created a pg thread - and demoted a moderator here just for calling it out, you fkng ****.
[On a side note, also funny seeing people of colour support and applaud racism, hate speech, and bigotry. Problem being, when they come to America they too face a much higher chance of being shot in the face than their kkk good buddies, just for answering their own fkn door.]
You crying about censorship while employing censorship on your own threads is hypocrisy, and you're pissed that it was pointed out.B.See » 12 Mar 2023, 5:33 am » wrote: ↑ And speaking of hypocrisy, funny how you and your bigot friends here want to take me to task for trying to create threads where topics are discussed minus the **** **** you gremlins typically employ..
But none of you have **** to say about how your fascist admin has branded just about every liberal here a "child groomer and sexual predator" including those who never created a pg thread - and demoted a moderator here just for calling it out, you fkng ****.
[On a side note, also funny seeing people of colour support and applaud racism, hate speech, and bigotry. Problem being, when they come to America they too face a much higher chance of being shot in the face than their kkk good buddies, just for answering their own fkn door.]
We're going down. F. Lee Failey has shown up on the scene.PastorBlast » 12 Mar 2023, 4:38 am » wrote: ↑ How does an anonymous user on an interent forum have rights?
I do wonder if .org had something to hide sometimes. I guess there may be some kind of legal exposure.
SOCKSAVINGS » 11 Mar 2023, 7:44 pm » wrote: ↑Glad to be of serviceStr8tEdge » 11 Mar 2023, 6:35 pm » wrote: ↑ You’re hired! Now I just need to get that 30k out of the sock and loan.
Anyone else need a GREENIE loan for legal representation from Phineas T. Peabody, Internet Attorney at Law?
Hello friend,GeorgeWashington » 12 Mar 2023, 2:14 pm » wrote: ↑ Someone needs to fractionally reserve you some greenies.
Hello @Phelix_Dacat ,SOCKSAVINGS » 11 Mar 2023, 7:44 pm » wrote: ↑ Glad to be of service
Anyone else need a GREENIE loan for legal representation from Phineas T. Peabody, Internet Attorney at Law?
No, YOU'RE the coward for failing to acknowledge how you and your fascist friends don't have **** to say in condemnation of fraudulently altered personal profiles, yet you wan't to make fraudulent equivalencies between my not being able to create new threads, post links or articles - and my requiring people to respond to my pg threads, pro OR con, by sticking to the topic.RedheadedStranger » 12 Mar 2023, 11:36 am » wrote: ↑ You crying about censorship while employing censorship on your own threads is hypocrisy, and you're pissed that it was pointed out.
Like I said, you don't come here to debate... you come here to blog your **** because you can do so without having to defend any of it.
You're a coward.