Yeah, you're pissed as hell.B.See » 13 Mar 2023, 9:32 pm » wrote: ↑ No, YOU'RE the coward for failing to acknowledge how you and your fascist friends don't have **** to say in condemnation of fraudulently altered personal profiles, yet you wan't to make fraudulent equivalencies between my not being able to create new threads, post links or articles - and my requiring people to respond to my pg threads, pro OR con, by sticking to the topic.
It is YOU who are pissed because I won't let you **** derail those thread with your USUAL ****-POSTING. So, go **** yourself.
Persuant to the rules of you SUCKIN' ON MAH DICK, child groomer/pedophile: NO TEEFS.Phelix_Dacat » 11 Mar 2023, 3:16 pm » wrote: ↑
Member(s) has/have filed or has/have threatened to file a lawsuit against the Liberalforum.net, it's owners, management, financial supporters, and other members on the site. The preservation of all documents will benefit your defense of the claim.
Pursuant to the rules of civil procedure, every party to a lawsuit has a duty to preserve all evidence which could be relevant to the suit. This includes the duty to preserve all electronic evidence, such as emails and posts discussing the incident or related to matters at issue in the suit.
Aren’t you afraid your anonymous online persona may be sued into the poor house???Cannonpointer » 14 Mar 2023, 1:45 am » wrote: ↑ Persuant to the rules of you SUCKIN' ON MAH DICK, child groomer/pedophile: NO TEEFS.
Take em out, Granny.
I have something to say.B.See » 13 Mar 2023, 9:32 pm » wrote: ↑ No, YOU'RE the coward for failing to acknowledge how you and your fascist friends don't have **** to say in condemnation of fraudulently altered personal profiles, yet you wan't to make fraudulent equivalencies between my not being able to create new threads, post links or articles - and my requiring people to respond to my pg threads, pro OR con, by sticking to the topic.
It is YOU who are pissed because I won't let you **** derail those thread with your USUAL ****-POSTING. So, go **** yourself.
rivet your piss flaps shut.B.See » 13 Mar 2023, 9:32 pm » wrote: ↑ No, YOU'RE the coward for failing to acknowledge how you and your fascist friends don't have **** to say in condemnation of fraudulently altered personal profiles, yet you wan't to make fraudulent equivalencies between my not being able to create new threads, post links or articles - and my requiring people to respond to my pg threads, pro OR con, by sticking to the topic.
It is YOU who are pissed because I won't let you **** derail those thread with your USUAL ****-POSTING. So, go **** yourself.
Phelix has a van
My online persona lives in the Cayman Islands, where we use US subpoenas to wax the gills of Mermaids.Str8tEdge » 14 Mar 2023, 1:51 am » wrote: ↑ Aren’t you afraid your anonymous online persona may be sued into the poor house???
You have 999K greenies out for the taking!
Skans » 15 Mar 2023, 10:06 am » wrote: ↑ My online persona lives in the Cayman Islands, where we use US subpoenas to wax the gills of Mermaids.
It comes as no surprise that in the delusional alternate realities of the MAGA minded that their perception of "cowardice" would be so TWISTED.
Spin it anyway you want buddy, but the fact remains that you heavily censor your own threads, while crying about being censored.B.See » 19 Mar 2023, 8:08 am » wrote: ↑ It comes as no surprise that in the delusional alternate realities of the MAGA minded that their perception of "cowardice" would be so TWISTED.
So I'll offer one more response for clarity's sake, as to what constitutes "cowardice" around here - not for fascist influenced willfully ignorant, such as yourself, upon whom all of this would be a wasted effort anyway, but for all the rest.
It is NOT, in fact, "cowardice" to make use of the pg thread option, provided via the forum, that allows for the regulation of and removal of drive by **** posting, trolling, and off topic commentary, while encouraging on topic discussion, either pro or con on the topics at hand -
especially after a year of deliberate attacks in non pg enabled threads: right winged pile-ons, trolling, name calling, mischaracterizations, fabricating "direct" quotes, and other garbage responses - specifically designed to derail the topic, and to bury the facts therein behind a wall of ****...
after which you cretins celebrate and high-five each other at your "cleverness" in running off liberals and silencing facts that you do not wish to acknowledge or discuss.
However,
It IS cowardice to engage in said drive by **** postings, pile-ons, trolling, name calling, mischaracterizations, off topic commentary, and garbage responses just to avoid any actual discussion of the topics therein
It IS cowardice to show up in pg enabled threads and to DELIBERATELY engage in more of the same, knowing it will get them kicked from the threads, which is what they want because they 1) are either too lazy to offer a substantive rebuttal or 2) they CAN'T rebut it short of labeling it all "fake news"
So instead, they gather in tribute threads and pity posts and bitch and moan about how they weren't allowed to trash the threads. Which of course is far easier than an actual discussion.
It IS cowardice to respond to an onslaught of news items, op-eds, and FACTS by trying to limit or stop the information by 1) proposing to shut down threads at will, 2) banning me from posting links, 3) banning me from posting images, and
4) having discovered that I was still capable of creating NEW threads in YOUR "safe space," banning me from being able to do that as well.
And, it IS cowardice to up and label all liberal members of the forum as "child groomers and sexual predators" for no other reason than they we liberals who don't subscribe to your ideology of HATE, and then to demote or run off liberal moderators who've called you out for you underhanded deceit and treachery.
Bottom line is, you and your ilk, under the protection of your conservative admin and their... supporters, have the run of the entire forum, INCLUDING apparently the (not) liberals only chat room, where you troll and ****-post there as well.
Yet here YOU all are, whining like little BITCHES about EIGHT FKNG PG THREADS! you sorry ****.
And in spite of all of that, some of us are still here (or at least until you ban us outright) which would be your final act of cowardice. No, bubba. the COWARDS are YOU.
Oh, too bad all of my posts fell into the lake while I was fishing.Phelix_Dacat » 11 Mar 2023, 3:16 pm » wrote: ↑ Re: NOTICE OF DUTY TO PRESERVE EVIDENCE
Dear (including but not limited to)
@admin
@GeorgeWashington
@Cannonpointer
@Deezer Shoove
@Annoyed Liberall
@Nobody AKA Misty
@Jinn Martini
and any other owner, moderator past or present, or financial supporter, as well as (including but not limited to)
@POM
@SJConspirator
@RebelGator
@Str8tEdge
@Warcok
and any other member of the site who has affirmed the libel of, including but not limited to,
@Blackvegetable
@nuckin futz
@Xavier_Onassis
@Ike Bana
@B.See
@ScottMon
@Pastafarian
@maineman
@slideman
@supraTruth
@Squatchman
@Trumprules
@Phelix_Dacat
and any other member designated at anytime with the rank of "Child Groomer" or "Sexual Predator" or any combination of such libel.
Member(s) has/have filed or has/have threatened to file a lawsuit against the Liberalforum.net, it's owners, management, financial supporters, and other members on the site. The preservation of all documents will benefit your defense of the claim.
Pursuant to the rules of civil procedure, every party to a lawsuit has a duty to preserve all evidence which could be relevant to the suit. This includes the duty to preserve all electronic evidence, such as emails and posts discussing the incident or related to matters at issue in the suit.
This duty to preserve evidence is broad and extends to all documents, regardless of whether the document is stored electronically (such as email) or in hard-copy and regardless of the type of document. For example, reports, spreadsheets, photographs and videotapes are all considered documents that must be preserved. Furthermore, the duty to preserve this documentary evidence extends to all documents in existence as of the time you reasonably anticipated this litigation.
To ensure that all relevant documents are preserved, you should communicate directly with all persons who have possession or control of potentially relevant evidence, including but not limited to people who deal with email and post retention, deletion, and archiving. You should advise each of these persons to preserve any relevant documents in their custody. Furthermore, you should advise all such persons that any regularly scheduled and/or automatic deletion of email or other electronic documents must be discontinued with respect to any relevant data. In addition, any document destruction (such as shredding of documents) must cease with respect to any relevant documents. All relevant documents, both electronic and paper, must be preserved for the duration of this litigation.
The statutes of limitations for defamation by libel vary. Consult with an attorney.
The only proper answer to his post was TLDR.Skans » 29 Apr 2023, 6:50 am » wrote: ↑ Oh, too bad all of my posts fell into the lake while I was fishing.