Liberal Forum

Her "apology" should be accepted by nobody. She should be told to eat ****.

Xavier_Onassis » 13 Mar 2023, 9:28 am » wrote: ↑

13 Mar 2023, 9:28 am

Releasing the tapes exclusively to the Figplucker was simply wrong.
The Figplucker is not a journalist or a reporter, he is an entertainer that plays the role of propagandist.

The tapes should have been released to E V E R Y O N E.

They’re currently working on releasing all 44k tapes to the public. 
 

Xavier_Onassis » 13 Mar 2023, 9:28 am » wrote: ↑

13 Mar 2023, 9:28 am

Releasing the tapes exclusively to the Figplucker was simply wrong.
The Figplucker is not a journalist or a reporter, he is an entertainer that plays the role of propagandist.

The tapes should have been released to E V E R Y O N E.

they will be patience 

ROG62 » 13 Mar 2023, 8:44 am » wrote: ↑

13 Mar 2023, 8:44 am

“I am sorry the nation was damaged by so much untruth issued by those with whom I identified at the time,” she wrote. She also analogized Fox News host Tucker Carlson’s decision to air the footage to Daniel Ellsberg’s 1971 leak of documents pertaining to the Vietnam War, commonly known as the Pentagon Papers:

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2023 ... 6-footage/

great job TUCKER!

That's a red pill of significant potency, right there. She has a constituency. 
 

Xavier_Onassis » 13 Mar 2023, 9:28 am » wrote: ↑

13 Mar 2023, 9:28 am

Releasing the tapes exclusively to the Figplucker was simply wrong.
The Figplucker is not a journalist or a reporter, he is an entertainer that plays the role of propagandist.

The tapes should have been released to E V E R Y O N E.

You were perfectly happy when they were censored, liar.

You're not mad that "only tucker" got them. You're mad that ANYONE DID, you lying groomer.
 

Xavier_Onassis » 13 Mar 2023, 9:28 am » wrote: ↑

13 Mar 2023, 9:28 am

Releasing the tapes exclusively to the Figplucker was simply wrong.
The Figplucker is not a journalist or a reporter, he is an entertainer that plays the role of propagandist.

The tapes should have been released to E V E R Y O N E.

          But you didn't have a problem in the world with every Left-Wing Pundit, News Org, & Politician cherry-picking, editing, omitting, changing timelines of events, lying, and wrongly persecuting their political opponents for the last 2 years did you?...   **** hypocrite...

ROG62 » 13 Mar 2023, 8:44 am » wrote: ↑

13 Mar 2023, 8:44 am

“I am sorry the nation was damaged by so much untruth issued by those with whom I identified at the time,” she wrote. She also analogized Fox News host Tucker Carlson’s decision to air the footage to Daniel Ellsberg’s 1971 leak of documents pertaining to the Vietnam War, commonly known as the Pentagon Papers:

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2023 ... 6-footage/

great job TUCKER!

She went QAnon:

Conspiracy theories

In the January 2013 issue of The Atlantic, law and business professor Mark Nuckols wrote: "In her various books, articles, and public speeches, Wolf has demonstrated recurring disregard for the historical record and consistently mutilated the truth with selective and ultimately deceptive use of her sources." He further stated: "[W]hen she distorts facts to advance her political agenda, she dishonors the victims of history and poisons present-day public discourse about issues of vital importance to a free society." Nuckols argued that Wolf "has for many years now been claiming that a fascist coup in America is imminent… n The Guardian she alleged, with no substantiation, that the U.S. government and big American banks are conspiring to impose a 'totally integrated corporate-state repression of dissent'."

 Vox journalist Max Fisher in October 2014 urged Wolf's readers "to understand the distinction between her earlier work, which rose on its merits, and her newer conspiracy theories, which are unhinged, damaging, and dangerous."

 Charles C. W. Cooke, writing for National Review Online in the same month, commented, "Over the last eight years, Naomi Wolf has written hysterically about coups and about vaginas and about little else besides. She has repeatedly insisted that the country is on the verge of martial law, and transmogrified every threat—both pronounced and overhyped—into a government-led plot to establish a dictatorship. She has made prediction after prediction that has simply not come to pass. Hers are not sober and sensible forecasts of runaway human nature, institutional atrophy, and constitutional decline, but psychedelic fever-dreams that are more typically suited to the InfoWars crowd."

 Aaron Goldstein wrote in an October 2014 article in The American Spectator, "Her words must be taken not just with a grain of salt, but a full shaker's worth."

 
 

ROG62 » 13 Mar 2023, 8:44 am » wrote: ↑

13 Mar 2023, 8:44 am

“I am sorry the nation was damaged by so much untruth issued by those with whom I identified at the time,” she wrote. She also analogized Fox News host Tucker Carlson’s decision to air the footage to Daniel Ellsberg’s 1971 leak of documents pertaining to the Vietnam War, commonly known as the Pentagon Papers:

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2023 ... 6-footage/

great job TUCKER!

The crazy goes way back:The insane conspiracy theories of Naomi Wolf

  Oct 5, 2014

https://www.vox.com/2014/10/5/6909837/n ... y-theories

Naomi Wolf published a series of Facebook posts in which she questioned the veracity of the ISIS videos showing the murders and beheadings of two Americans and two Britons, strongly implying that the videos had been staged by the US government and that the victims and their parents were actors.

This culminated in a now-deleted post, reproduced below, suggesting that the ISIS beheading videos had been staged, as had the initial abductions of the two American journalists and two British aid workers killed on camera. She hints that she believes this was done by the US military.

Wolf published a separate Facebook post suggesting that the US was sending troops to West Africa not to assist with Ebola treatment but to bring Ebola back to the US to justify a military takeover of American society. 
​​​​​
She posted at great length on Ebola, including a post arguing that the US troops traveling to Liberia were not actually sent to help fight Ebola, but rather to further the aim of a "militarized Africa" and because this "creates a direct vector into the US" for Ebola, meant "to justify military condoning [sic] of US population."

 
 

OdeToJoy » 14 Mar 2023, 9:31 am » wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2023, 9:31 am

The crazy goes way back:The insane conspiracy theories of Naomi Wolf

  Oct 5, 2014

https://www.vox.com/2014/10/5/6909837/n ... y-theories

Naomi Wolf published a series of Facebook posts in which she questioned the veracity of the ISIS videos showing the murders and beheadings of two Americans and two Britons, strongly implying that the videos had been staged by the US government and that the victims and their parents were actors.

This culminated in a now-deleted post, reproduced below, suggesting that the ISIS beheading videos had been staged, as had the initial abductions of the two American journalists and two British aid workers killed on camera. She hints that she believes this was done by the US military.

Wolf published a separate Facebook post suggesting that the US was sending troops to West Africa not to assist with Ebola treatment but to bring Ebola back to the US to justify a military takeover of American society. 
​​​​​
She posted at great length on Ebola, including a post arguing that the US troops traveling to Liberia were not actually sent to help fight Ebola, but rather to further the aim of a "militarized Africa" and because this "creates a direct vector into the US" for Ebola, meant "to justify military condoning [sic] of US population."

          Naomi Wolfe has always been a conspiracy loon ---- but it never bothered the Left when her theories aligned with their narrative and assaults on the Right.... Let's keep in mind she was an Advisor to the Clinton, then Gore Presidential campaigns -- was a much celebrated Feminist & Author, penning books titled "My Vagina"... Another of her novels titled Promiscuities explored the shifting patterns of contemporary adolescent sexuality... Shes written articles for Huff Post and many other Liberal rag-sheets --- and has attached her brand to numerous Lefist causes & protests over the years... While Wolfe did receive some criticism from the progressive flock over the years, her supporters in the Party far outnumbered her detractors...  She's still a nut, but now has outlived any remaining purpose as a useful idiot to the Democrats.  
 

Str8tEdge » 13 Mar 2023, 10:35 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Mar 2023, 10:35 pm

They’re currently working on releasing all 44k tapes to the public.

How long does it take to transfer digital information that has already been organized and received for transmission? Maybe three hours at most?
That is not anything the Figplucker and his huge staff need to work on. 
It was WRONG to provide these exclusively to a propagandist like the Figplucker.
I would not be surprised if they stall a long time on this, because the Asshole Fascists at the bogus "Freedom Caucus" know that Trump looks like **** and fell in it and they know that only the stupidest saps actually believe Trump or the GOP.

OdeToJoy » 14 Mar 2023, 9:31 am » wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2023, 9:31 am

The crazy goes way back:The insane conspiracy theories of Naomi Wolf

  Oct 5, 2014

https://www.vox.com/2014/10/5/6909837/n ... y-theories

Naomi Wolf published a series of Facebook posts in which she questioned the veracity of the ISIS videos showing the murders and beheadings of two Americans and two Britons, strongly implying that the videos had been staged by the US government and that the victims and their parents were actors.

This culminated in a now-deleted post, reproduced below, suggesting that the ISIS beheading videos had been staged, as had the initial abductions of the two American journalists and two British aid workers killed on camera. She hints that she believes this was done by the US military.

Wolf published a separate Facebook post suggesting that the US was sending troops to West Africa not to assist with Ebola treatment but to bring Ebola back to the US to justify a military takeover of American society. 
​​​​​
She posted at great length on Ebola, including a post arguing that the US troops traveling to Liberia were not actually sent to help fight Ebola, but rather to further the aim of a "militarized Africa" and because this "creates a direct vector into the US" for Ebola, meant "to justify military condoning [sic] of US population."

she sounds like a good journalist lead astray...
 

Xavier_Onassis » 14 Mar 2023, 12:49 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2023, 12:49 pm

How long does it take to transfer digital information that has already been organized and received for transmission? Maybe three hours at most?
That is not anything the Figplucker and his huge staff need to work on. 
It was WRONG to provide these exclusively to a propagandist like the Figplucker.
I would not be surprised if they stall a long time on this, because the Asshole Fascists at the bogus "Freedom Caucus" know that Trump looks like **** and fell in it and they know that only the stupidest saps actually believe Trump or the GOP.

Again... 
what are YOU afraid of here?.....
since you have aleady proven to the board that no amount of video evidence will ever change your opinion regarding Jan.6th.....
are you afraid that all of those Americans who identify as moderate Democrats will change their opinions regarding Jan.6th?......and ruin any credibility your party enjoyed while propagating hoax after hoax after hoax ......for years...





 

Cannonpointer » 14 Mar 2023, 1:18 am » wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2023, 1:18 am

You were perfectly happy when they were censored, liar.\\

WHAT LIE ?

You're not mad that "only tucker" got them. You're mad that ANYONE DID, you lying groomer.

Again with the "groomer" ****,  Go suck a toad.
 

I offered no opinion at all, dummy. I am all for the press having access to public documents, and have never said otherwise.

Now you claim to know what makes me happy.  Really?   

Xavier_Onassis » 14 Mar 2023, 1:11 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2023, 1:11 pm

I offered no opinion at all, dummy.

Don't blame me - I'm not the one who tells you what to think. Blame NAMBLA.

Xavier_Onassis » 14 Mar 2023, 1:11 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2023, 1:11 pm

I am all for the press having access to public documents, and have never said otherwise.

Sure you are, sugar britches - sure you are. And we ALL believe you.

Xavier_Onassis » 14 Mar 2023, 1:11 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2023, 1:11 pm

Now you claim to know what makes me happy.  Really?

BOTH things, yes.

*** cock, and seeing children sexualized.
 

SouthernFried » 13 Mar 2023, 10:31 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Mar 2023, 10:31 pm

Her "apology" should be accepted by nobody. She should be told to eat ****.

Why would you say that, bro? Are you so intolerant that you can't accept people owning their ****?
 

OdeToJoy » 14 Mar 2023, 2:10 am » wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2023, 2:10 am

She went QAnon:

Conspiracy theories

 

That **** doesn't play anymore, fruitcake. 

Try it in Rubesville - your **** will get nothing but eye rolls from the human community. 

Most children are born "sexualized". Nature does that. Most people do not want their children to be gay or Lesbian, and even fewer want to go through surgical sex change operations. But that is not the same thing at all from children being aware that SOME human beings are gay, Lesbian or Queer, and should be treated equally.

Xavier_Onassis » 14 Mar 2023, 12:49 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2023, 12:49 pm

How long does it take to transfer digital information that has already been organized and received for transmission? Maybe three hours at most?
That is not anything the Figplucker and his huge staff need to work on. 
It was WRONG to provide these exclusively to a propagandist like the Figplucker.
I would not be surprised if they stall a long time on this, because the Asshole Fascists at the bogus "Freedom Caucus" know that Trump looks like **** and fell in it and they know that only the stupidest saps actually believe Trump or the GOP.

                     If it is such a quick & short order to transfer that digital information (which I agree with) how come you had no issues with it taking over 2 years to release the Video evidence which sent much of your Jan 6 narrative down the toilet, and innocent people into jail cells?