Liberal Forum

RedheadedStranger » 13 Mar 2023, 9:20 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Mar 2023, 9:20 pm

I'm saying that your designation of "Texas gun nuts" to the parents implied far right wing.

It certainly didn't imply progressive minority, and you know it.

Ironically, Houston is mostly minority and Democrat so... chances are, the kid would have grown up to be one of yours.

you inferred right wing.  I made no such implication.

I merely implied that the parents were irresponsible gun owners.  It cost them one daughter...hoepfully it costs them their freedom.

golfboy » 13 Mar 2023, 9:25 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Mar 2023, 9:25 pm

Not in today's democrat party.

sez a non-democrat.  who can't read.

moron.


"Yes asshole.... fifty votes IS all that is needed to pass a bill in the Senate when all senators are present and voting"

             

golfboy » 13 Mar 2023, 9:23 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Mar 2023, 9:23 pm

Was she an NRA member?   If not, why the thread title?

I wanted to get the perspective of NRA members to the incident.

I wouldn't think that three year olds are even capable of joining the NRA.

idiot.

maineman » 13 Mar 2023, 9:20 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Mar 2023, 9:20 pm

I challenged the 2nd Amendment supporters from across the political spectrum to explain, what, if any, limitations they saw in the abridgment of right to the people to bear arms.  If you were NOT an avid 2A supporter, the post was not aimed at you.

I CAN ONLY SEE FROM YOUR STATEMENTS THAT EXTREME RACISM RAVAGES YOU WHILE POINTING BLAME ON WHITE RIGHT-WING GUN OWNERS FOR THE DEATH OF A YOUNG CHILD WHEN IN FACT THERE IS A MUCH GREATER POSSIBILITY THE GUN TOTING PARENT WAS A BLACK LIBERAL MINORITY, 2A SUPPORTER OR NOT.   
 

righteous » 13 Mar 2023, 9:23 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Mar 2023, 9:23 pm

HIS APPARENT ASSUMPTION FROM HIS STATEMENT IS THAT ALL TEXANS ARE RIGHT WING GUN NUTS WHEN IN FACT HARRIS COUNTY HAS A MINORITY OF WHITE AND A MAJORITY OF DEMOCRATS. THERE IS NO OTHER WAY TO DECIPHER HIS GIBBERISH

your incorrect inference has absolutely nothing to do with any implication I may have made.

lose the all caps, btw... it really is sort of discordant.

righteous » 13 Mar 2023, 9:30 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Mar 2023, 9:30 pm

I CAN ONLY SEE FROM YOUR STATEMENTS THAT EXTREME RACISM RAVAGES YOU WHILE POINTING BLAME ON WHITE RIGHT-WING GUN OWNERS FOR THE DEATH OF A YOUNG CHILD WHEN IN FACT THERE IS A MUCH GREATER POSSIBILITY THE GUN TOTING PARENT WAS A BLACK LIBERAL MINORITY, 2A SUPPORTER OR NOT.

I never said anything about race, or skin color, or political affiliation.  I merely asked for comments from NRA members.

maineman » 13 Mar 2023, 9:29 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Mar 2023, 9:29 pm

I wanted to get the perspective of NRA members to the incident.

I wouldn't think that three year olds are even capable of joining the NRA.

idiot.

Why would an NRA member's perspective be any different than yours?
 

golfboy » 13 Mar 2023, 9:38 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Mar 2023, 9:38 pm

Why would an NRA member's perspective be any different than yours?

Are you suggesting that no one can have a different perspective on the absolute nature of the 2nd Amendment from NTA members?

maineman » 13 Mar 2023, 9:26 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Mar 2023, 9:26 pm

you inferred right wing.  I made no such implication.

I merely implied that the parents were irresponsible gun owners.  It cost them one daughter...hoepfully it costs them their freedom.

Actually, you implied that you were happy that at least one of their kids wouldn't be around to procreate you piece of garbage.

​​You can deny it all you want, but you did just that.
​​
 

maineman » 13 Mar 2023, 9:33 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Mar 2023, 9:33 pm

I never said anything about race, or skin color, or political affiliation.  I merely asked for comments from NRA members.

YOU'RE SAYING YOUR STATEMENT:  it would be that killing the children of Texas gun nuts before THEY themselves can procreate deepens the gene pool ever so slightly.  
IS REFERENCING BOTH RIGHT-WING AND LEFT-WING PARTIES?
HARD TO BELIEVE KNOWING WHO YOU ARE FROM YOUR POSTS.

PUSSIES SEEMED TO BE BOTHERED BY THE CAPS. 

  
 

RedheadedStranger » 13 Mar 2023, 9:45 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Mar 2023, 9:45 pm

Actually, you implied that you were happy that at least one of their kids wouldn't be around to procreate you piece of garbage.

​​You can deny it all you want, but you did just that.
​​

silver linings are called that because they are not optimal.  If they were, they'd be golden linings.  Parents who are so negligent as to leave loaded hand guns within reach of three year olds are, de facto, not from the deep end of the gene pool.  Their progeny won't be either.  Sad, but true.  Would I prefer that the three year old had NOT shot her four year old sister?  Of course. Would I prefer that the four year old had been given the chance to grow up and become a drive through clerk at McDonalds?  Of course.  Is the gene pool a little deeper with her passing?  I would say yes.  Silver lining... not golden... silver.  Not the optimal solution, but  it has some aspects of it that are upsides.

righteous » 13 Mar 2023, 9:50 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Mar 2023, 9:50 pm

YOU'RE SAYING YOUR STATEMENT:  it would be that killing the children of Texas gun nuts before THEY themselves can procreate deepens the gene pool ever so slightly.  
IS REFERENCING BOTH RIGHT-WING AND LEFT-WING PARTIES?
HARD TO BELIEVE KNOWING WHO YOU ARE FROM YOUR POSTS.

PUSSIES SEEMED TO BE BOTHERED BY THE CAPS.

my words speak for themselves... you are free to mischaracterize them to fit your agenda.  

I could give a ****.

And I am not bothered by all caps...I merely point out that it only makes it appear as if you think that saying something louder will make it magically more true.  It doesn't

maineman » 13 Mar 2023, 9:53 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Mar 2023, 9:53 pm

silver linings are called that because they are not optimal.  If they were, they'd be golden linings.  Parents who are so negligent as to leave loaded hand guns within reach of three year olds are, de facto, not from the deep end of the gene pool.  Their progeny won't be either.  Sad, but true.  Would I prefer that the three year old had NOT shot her four year old sister?  Of course. Would I prefer that the four year old had been given the chance to grow up and become a drive through clerk at McDonalds?  Of course.  Is the gene pool a little deeper with her passing?  I would say yes.  Silver lining... not golden... silver.  Not the optimal solution, but  it has some aspects of it that are upsides.

Nah... you were giddy the kid was dead because you thought her parents were "Texas gun nuts"... i.e. right wingers.

You can put as much lipstick on that pig as you want too, but it's still a pig... and you're still a piece of garbage for saying that ****.

​​​​

RedheadedStranger » 13 Mar 2023, 9:59 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Mar 2023, 9:59 pm

Nah... you were giddy the kid was dead because you thought her parents were "Texas gun nuts"... i.e. right wingers.

You can put as much lipstick on that pig as you want too, but it's still a pig... and you're still a piece of garbage for saying that ****.

​​​​

you can infer whatever the **** you want.  My words speak for themselves, and are silent when it comes to political affiliation 

Now...do you have anything of substance, or are you gonna keep beating this dead cat?

maineman » 13 Mar 2023, 9:41 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Mar 2023, 9:41 pm

Are you suggesting that no one can have a different perspective on the absolute nature of the 2nd Amendment from NTA members?

Your OP said nothing about "the absolute nature of the 2nd Amendment" 

 

maineman » 13 Mar 2023, 5:58 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Mar 2023, 5:58 pm

what does the NRA have to do with the rampant scourge of gun violence in America?

If you have to ask, we really have nothing to talk about.

Yeah, ****, explain away. How is the NRA responsible for a kid who picks up an unsecured handgun in a private household? What kind of lazy argument is that? "DeeeRrP! NRA's FauLt! DEEeeeRrrP!". **** ***-clown. Speaking of, I could have sworn that liberals were only after AR-15's, so what's your qualm with handguns all of a sudden? Is a 100% total ban of all firearms your dream, "proud navy veteran"? Maybe you should have spent a little more time understanding what you swore an oath to when you enlisted instead of taking cocks in your *** in a submarine. 

golfboy » 13 Mar 2023, 10:12 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Mar 2023, 10:12 pm

Your OP said nothing about "the absolute nature of the 2nd Amendment"

His OP was a troll at the expense of a dead four year old.

maineman » 13 Mar 2023, 9:56 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Mar 2023, 9:56 pm

my words speak for themselves... you are free to mischaracterize them to fit your agenda.  

I could give a ****.

And I am not bothered by all caps...I merely point out that it only makes it appear as if you think that saying something louder will make it magically more true.  It doesn't

YOU DON'T QUITE REALIZE THE IMPLICATIONS YOUR OWN WORDS SPEAK. YOU BELIEVE YOUR SKIRTING WILL OUTWIT EVERY POSTER, BUT YOUR MISINFORMED. YOU'RE ENTIRELY TRANSPARENT AND EASILY DETECTABLE.

TO SUM UP YOUR THREAD, IRRESPONSIBLE BIDEN SUPPORTER *** PARENTS DIDN'T PROPERLY SECURE THEIR WEAPON RESULTING IN ONE CHILD KILLING ANOTHER. PEOPLE KILL PEOPLE. GUNS ARE NECESSARY IN A FUTURE COMMUNIST AMERICA.  
YOU BELIEVE THIS WAS A GOOD THING RESULTING IN ONE LESS *** ON THE WELFARE ROLLS.


CAPS HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH SAYING THINGS LOUDER. STATEMENTS BORNE FROM THE UNLETTERED 
 

golfboy » 13 Mar 2023, 10:12 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Mar 2023, 10:12 pm

Your OP said nothing about "the absolute nature of the 2nd Amendment"

my OP merely asked what NRA members thought of the incident.  I never mentioned political affiliation, nor dd I suggest or even imply that everyone needed to hold a uniform view of the meaning of the 2nd amendment.

righteous » 13 Mar 2023, 10:20 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Mar 2023, 10:20 pm

YOU DON'T QUITE REALIZE THE IMPLICATIONS YOUR OWN WORDS SPEAK. YOU BELIEVE YOUR SKIRTING WILL OUTWIT EVERY POSTER, BUT YOUR MISINFORMED. YOU'RE ENTIRELY TRANSPARENT AND EASILY DETECTABLE.

TO SUM UP YOUR THREAD, IRRESPONSIBLE BIDEN SUPPORTER *** PARENTS DIDN'T PROPERLY SECURE THEIR WEAPON RESULTING IN ONE CHILD KILLING ANOTHER. PEOPLE KILL PEOPLE. GUNS ARE NECESSARY IN A FUTURE COMMUNIST AMERICA.  
YOU BELIEVE THIS WAS A GOOD THING RESULTING IN ONE LESS *** ON THE WELFARE ROLLS.

CAPS HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH SAYING THINGS LOUDER. STATEMENTS BORNE FROM THE UNLETTERED

cool story