Liberal Forum

RedheadedStranger » 14 Mar 2023, 8:27 am » wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2023, 8:27 am

My point stands.

You have no solution. You're just playing politics with dead kids.

I'm not surprised.

                       
appears you are correct.
this character NED is all talk, all talk. Nothing more, all talk.
https://i.postimg.cc/CKq76Kps/NED.jpg
                       
shooting people, reenacting movie scenes, burring people in his back yard.
shovels, his "wifes" shoveling abilities.. all talk all talk
                       
https://media.tenor.com/fChktGOuyjQAAAA ... ughing.gif
 
                       
 
 
 

maineman » 13 Mar 2023, 9:09 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Mar 2023, 9:09 pm

I don't wonder about anything MAGAts like you think.  I know I served.  I am proud of my service and some moron on an internet political chat site has no impact on that pride.  I never cheered about anyone who died from COVID.  In fact, in my own family, my first cousin, with whom I was very close in my early years, had a son, who was a Big time MAGAt, but was otherwise was a nice guy and a nice father and husband and he pooh poohed the COVID vaccine and he got COVID and he died and my cousin is devastated.  I never cheered his death, and mourned with my cousin.

here we go. playing the victim card again....
 

LincolnNebraska » 14 Mar 2023, 8:29 am » wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2023, 8:29 am

@maineman    Post pics of your guns.  Oh, you can't because you don't own any.

hello lil fella...     

 

all talk all talk          

impotent as well  
 

LincolnNebraska » 14 Mar 2023, 8:29 am » wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2023, 8:29 am

@maineman    Post pics of your guns.  Oh, you can't because you don't own any.

sweet signature  

maineman » 14 Mar 2023, 8:05 am » wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2023, 8:05 am

^^^ascribing suggestions to me that I never made.

boring

Oh, right, right.

You just ran some **** about a kid killing a kid. The last thing on EARTH you meant to suggest is that we should start gun grabbing.

Why, shuga wutn melt in yo MOUTH!

BORING, fruity.

Keep lobbing and then complaining about spikes, fruitcup.   
 

Cannonpointer » 14 Mar 2023, 11:25 am » wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2023, 11:25 am

Oh, right, right.

You just ran some **** about a kid killing a kid. The last thing on EARTH you meant to suggest is that we should start gun grabbing.

Why, shuga wutn melt in yo MOUTH!

BORING, fruity.

Keep lobbing and then complaining about spikes, fruitcup. 

Like I said, anytime anyone ever even tries to START a conversation about any sort of issues about finding ways to stop gun violence, the immediate answer is always akin to "what part of 'shall not be infringed" didn't you understand the first time?"  ALL STOP.

And again.... why do you, of all people, a man who has admitted to sucking another man's cock on more than one occasion, feel compelled to call heterosexual men who have never done such a thing "fruity"?

That is sort of like the pot calling the bed sheet black.

maineman » 14 Mar 2023, 11:51 am » wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2023, 11:51 am

Like I said, anytime anyone ever even tries to START a conversation about any sort of issues about finding ways to stop gun violence, the immediate answer is always akin to "what part of 'shall not be infringed" didn't you understand the first time?"  ALL STOP.

And why would that be, do you suppose, Innocence Eiliene McFruityvictim?

Any ideas? ANY at all?

maineman » 14 Mar 2023, 11:51 am » wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2023, 11:51 am

And again.... why do you, of all people, a man who has admitted to sucking another man's cock on more than one occasion, feel compelled to call heterosexual men who have never done such a thing "fruity"?

Oh, Idunno - takes one to know one, cock breath?

maineman » 14 Mar 2023, 11:51 am » wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2023, 11:51 am

That is sort of like the pot calling the bed sheet black.

And there you are compuslively referencing beds again. How many times do I need to tell you that I am NOT GOING TO REMAKE "IN THE BEDROOM" WITH YOU AND YOUR INBRED SONS, you **** freak?
 

Cannonpointer » 14 Mar 2023, 12:44 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2023, 12:44 pm

1.  And why would that be, do you suppose, Innocence Eiliene McFruityvictim?  Any ideas? ANY at all?

2. Oh, Idunno - takes one to know one, cock breath?

3. And there you are compuslively referencing beds again. How many times do I need to tell you that I am NOT GOING TO REMAKE "IN THE BEDROOM" WITH YOU AND YOUR INBRED SONS, you **** freak?

1. Why?  Because gun nuts can't imagine any possible way to curb gun violence.  As far as you idiots are concerned, it's just a fact of life. 
2. stupid idiom devoid of truth.  You don't know **** from fat meat about me.... and you certainly don't KNOW something about my sexual preference that is, in fact NOT a fact.
3.  Your cultural ignorance is only surpassed by your annoying Napoleon complex.

maineman » 14 Mar 2023, 1:10 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2023, 1:10 pm

1. Why?  Because gun nuts can't imagine any possible way to curb gun violence.  As far as you idiots are concerned, it's just a fact of life.

Then you must be a gun nut, since you are on here begging for answers, groomer.
 

Cannonpointer » 14 Mar 2023, 2:07 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2023, 2:07 pm

Then you must be a gun nut, since you are on here begging for answers, groomer.

^^^^ illogical and nonsensical word salad from an admitted cock sucker.

Groomer?  I don't groom anybody.  I don't even groom my dog.  I pay a place to groom her and clip her nails every month whether she needs  it or not.  That is the total extent of my "grooming".  

maineman » 14 Mar 2023, 2:16 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2023, 2:16 pm

^^^^ illogical and nonsensical word salad from an admitted cock sucker.
 

The fact that you are too stupid to follow your own logic to its obvious conclusion is probably due to all the time you spend grooming children for pedophiles rather than applying your brain to useful activities, groomer. 
 

Cannonpointer » 14 Mar 2023, 2:07 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2023, 2:07 pm

Then you must be a gun nut, since you are on here begging for answers, groomer.

How does my seeking some sort of consensus solution put me on the same side as those people refusing to even conceive of a consensus solution?

Please explain

maineman » 14 Mar 2023, 3:04 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2023, 3:04 pm

How does my seeking some sort of consensus solution put me on the same side as those people refusing to even conceive of a consensus solution?

Please explain

apparently not.  One would think that @Cannonpointer  aka Logic-man, aka Mr. Spock would just do a Vulcan mind meld with someone and figure out how to answer that softball question I gave him. 

maineman » 14 Mar 2023, 3:04 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2023, 3:04 pm

How does my seeking some sort of consensus solution put me on the same side as those people refusing to even conceive of a consensus solution?

Please explain

Was THAT the intention of the OP? Or was it to elicit something you could victim-pose over?

Because if THAT was the intention of the OP, your OP failed. But if victim-posing was - as I suppose - the intention, then it was a success. 

It's a loser's game, victim-posing. But you're a winner AT it.

maineman » 14 Mar 2023, 4:00 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2023, 4:00 pm

apparently not.  One would think that @Cannonpointer  aka Logic-man, aka Mr. Spock would just do a Vulcan mind meld with someone and figure out how to answer that softball question I gave him.

Not only did I already answer it, but I even gave you your booby prize - an excuse to victim pose.

A simple thank you would suffice - though more victim-posing was the more obvious and predictable course.
 
 

maineman » 13 Mar 2023, 2:15 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Mar 2023, 2:15 pm

“In no other similarly large or wealthy country are firearm deaths in the top 4 causes of mortality let alone the number 1 cause of death among children,”
 

Notice how this lying piece of **** misuses statistics in the SAME MANNER that anti-gun nuts do - because he is one. 

Firearms are NOT the number 1 cause of death among CHILDREN.

The way these queers get that stat is to pretend 19 year olds are "children" - even though they can vote and go to war and never get put into juvy if they offend. They can be charged with contributing to a minor and made a sex criminal for **** a 16 year old. But for the purpse of this anti-gun piece of ****'s narrative, they are "children."

Just remember how he mangles definitions and changes the meanings of words, the next time he lies that is not a groomer.
 

Cannonpointer » 14 Mar 2023, 4:45 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2023, 4:45 pm

Notice how this lying piece of **** misuses statistics in the SAME MANNER that anti-gun nuts do - because he is one. 

Firearms are NOT the number 1 cause of death among CHILDREN.

The way these queers get that stat is to pretend 19 year olds are "children" - even though they can vote and go to war and never get put into juvy if they offend. They can be charged with contributing to a minor and made a sex criminal for **** a 16 year old. But for the purpse of this anti-gun piece of ****'s narrative, they are "children."

Just remember how he mangles definitions and changes the meanings of words, the next time he lies that is not a groomer.

The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC) defines a child as everyone under 18 unless, "under the law applicable to the child, majority is attained earlier".

Did I mangle that, Spock?

maineman » 14 Mar 2023, 4:52 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2023, 4:52 pm

The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC) defines a child as everyone under 18 unless, "under the law applicable to the child, majority is attained earlier".

Did I mangle that, Spock?

Yes, liar. You mangled it. 

Because if you count ONLY THAT COHORT, your claim is a lie, you **** monkey. 
 

Cannonpointer » 14 Mar 2023, 4:21 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2023, 4:21 pm

Was THAT the intention of the OP? Or was it to elicit something you could victim-pose over?

Because if THAT was the intention of the OP, your OP failed. But if victim-posing was - as I suppose - the intention, then it was a success. 

It's a loser's game, victim-posing. But you're a winner AT it.

You claimed that I was a gun nut because I disagreed with the assertion that there was no room for finding consensus in solving the gun violence epidemic.  That was, on its very face, patently ridiculous and profoundly illogical, Mr Spock.

I posted the OP to see if there were ANY NRA members who might be outraged enough by this crime to begin to break ranks and be willing to start a dialog aimed at consensus.

Silly me.  If Sandy Hook wouldn't break the NRA's resolve, why would one dead four year old?

Call me a cockeyed optimist, I guess.  Hope springs eternal.