Liberal Forum

Cannonpointer » 14 Mar 2023, 4:54 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2023, 4:54 pm

Yes, liar. You mangled it. 

Because if you count ONLY THAT COHORT, your claim is a lie, you **** monkey.

because of the 19 is one year older than 18?

Yeah... now THAT's a strong argument to plant your flag on.

By the way... how many angels do YOU think can dance on the head of a pin?

Really... that's important!  

maineman » 14 Mar 2023, 5:04 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2023, 5:04 pm

You claimed that I was a gun nut because I disagreed with the assertion that there was no room for finding consensus in solving the gun violence epidemic.  That was, on its very face, patently ridiculous and profoundly illogical, Mr Spock.

I posted the OP to see if there were ANY NRA members who might be outraged enough by this crime to begin to break ranks and be willing to start a dialog aimed at consensus.

Silly me.  If Sandy Hook wouldn't break the NRA's resolve, why would one dead four year old?

Call me a cockeyed optimist, I guess.  Hope springs eternal.

****.

You used a dead kid to troll pro 2nd Amendment proponents, got called on it, and got pissed because you looked stupid.

At one point you were inviting me to come to "come on up" to Maine so you could kill me and bury me in your back yard.

You weren't looking for dialog at all. You were looking for a fight.

Like I said, you're about as disingenuous as they come.


​​​

RedheadedStranger » 14 Mar 2023, 5:12 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2023, 5:12 pm

****.

You used a dead kid to troll pro 2nd Amendment proponents, got called on it, and got pissed because you looked stupid.

At one point you were inviting me to come to "come on up" to Maine so you could kill me and bury me in your back yard.

You weren't looking for dialog at all. You were looking for a fight.

Like I said, you're about as disingenuous as they come.

​​​

did ANY NRA members indicate they were willing to enter a dialog leading to consensus?  NOT ONE OF YOU. 

not

one.

maineman » 14 Mar 2023, 5:07 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2023, 5:07 pm

because of the 19 is one year older than 18?

Yeah... now THAT's a strong argument to plant your flag on.

By the way... how many angels do YOU think can dance on the head of a pin?

Really... that's important!

Statistics mean things. Math means things. 

When you paste a false statistic, it means things. 

SPECIFICALLY, it means you're caught in a lie, fruity. 

The argument that it is only a small lie is ITSELF an admission you lied, groomer. 
 

maineman » 14 Mar 2023, 5:04 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2023, 5:04 pm

You claimed that I was a gun nut because I disagreed with the assertion that there was no room for finding consensus in solving the gun violence epidemic.  That was, on its very face, patently ridiculous and profoundly illogical, Mr Spock.

Continue to reframe - that's an order, groomer.

maineman » 14 Mar 2023, 5:04 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2023, 5:04 pm

I posted the OP to see if there were ANY NRA members who might be outraged enough by this crime to begin to break ranks and be willing to start a dialog aimed at consensus.

Yeah, yeah - that explians the hash tags and the anti-gun dog-whistles - UP TO AND INCLUDING A DEBUNKED LEFTIST TROPE RELYING ON DISHONEST STATISTICAL CLAIMS.

maineman » 14 Mar 2023, 5:04 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2023, 5:04 pm

Silly me.  If Sandy Hook wouldn't break the NRA's resolve, why would one dead four year old?

Call me a cockeyed optimist, I guess.  Hope springs eternal.

No, I call you a groomer and an anti-gun oath breaker, ***.

maineman » 14 Mar 2023, 5:15 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2023, 5:15 pm

did ANY NRA members indicate they were willing to enter a dialog leading to consensus?  NOT ONE OF YOU. 

not

one.

You asked a question and the unanimous answer you received from the "gun nutters" was that the parents should face serious charges for neglect in the death of the girl.

Then when I pointed out that your stats were **** and that you were mocking a dead kid in the process, you got pissed and started talking about killing me and burying me in your back yard.

At one point I even asked what it was YOU propose to keep this from happening again, and you dodged the question.

"Dialogue" was the last thing you were looking for when you started this thread you disingenuous piece of trash.

You may now **** off.

 
 

RedheadedStranger » 14 Mar 2023, 5:21 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2023, 5:21 pm

You asked a question and the unanimous answer you received from the "gun nutters" was that the parents should face serious charges for neglect in the death of the girl.

Then when I pointed out that your stats were **** and that you were mocking a dead kid in the process, you got pissed and started talking about killing me and burying me in your back yard.

"Dialogue" was the last thing you were looking for when you started this thread you disingenuous piece of trash.

You may now **** off.

which was my suggestion at my second  post.  

And that's it?  That's what the NRA thinks is a consensus solution to gun violence epidemic?  putting the parents of three year olds who shot their sisters in jail.


 

RedheadedStranger » 14 Mar 2023, 5:12 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2023, 5:12 pm

****.

You used a dead kid to troll pro 2nd Amendment proponents, got called on it, and got pissed because you looked stupid.

At one point you were inviting me to come to "come on up" to Maine so you could kill me and bury me in your back yard.

You weren't looking for dialog at all. You were looking for a fight.

Like I said, you're about as disingenuous as they come.

​​​

He lied that guns are the number one killer of "children" - then lied that using 18 and 19 year olds as part of the "children" claim was a tiny issue - two full years of adult deaths mischaracterized as children's deaths, for the sole purpose of making a lying **** claim. You gotta turn 20 to escape their fake statistic - **** soldiers killed in affie are counted as "child" deaths.

The OP was one big anti-gun dog whistle - and the instant I responded as if he were an anti-gunner, he responded aa a grievously injured, staunch 2nd amendment crusader whose intentions were pure. 

He's a groomer and a liar.

The left uses chicago gang bangers and soldiers in body bags to puff child-mortality statistics, and they count on dishonest queers like maineboi to puke them onto boards like these.

 
 

Cannonpointer » 14 Mar 2023, 5:20 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2023, 5:20 pm

1.  Continue to reframe - that's an order, groomer.

2.  Yeah, yeah - that explians the hash tags and the anti-gun dog-whistles - UP TO AND INCLUDING A DEBUNKED LEFTIST TROPE RELYING ON DISHONEST STATISTICAL CLAIMS.

No, I call you a groomer and an anti-gun oath breaker, ***. 

1.  Are you denying that you called me a gun nut and have yet even tried to explain that illogical idiocy?
2.  Because I didn't sing Kumbaya and offer to pick up your bar tab does not mean I was not seeking a dialog
3.  Funny stuff from an admitted cock sucker.
 

maineman » 14 Mar 2023, 5:25 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2023, 5:25 pm

which was my suggestion at my second  post.  

And that's it?  That's what the NRA thinks is a consensus solution to gun violence epidemic?  putting the parents of three year olds who shot their sisters in jail.

What's YOUR "consensus solution," staunch 2nd Amendment supporter?    

maineman » 14 Mar 2023, 5:30 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2023, 5:30 pm

1.  Are you denying that you called me a gun nut and have yet even tried to explain that illogical idiocy?

I am denying that, ***. I responded to you as an ANTI-GUNNER, and you spewed ****, and I said that BASED ON THAT ****, you - an obvious anti-second amendment fruit - would qualify as a gun nut. Now, suck off with that dishonesty, you anti-gun piece of **** oath breaker.

maineman » 14 Mar 2023, 5:30 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2023, 5:30 pm

2.  Because I didn't sing Kumbaya and offer to pick up your bar tab does not mean I was not seeking a dialog

But the anti-gun dog whistles and the fake statistics did.

Now, how would you characterize the last joke you told, groomer?

maineman » 14 Mar 2023, 5:30 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2023, 5:30 pm

3.  Funny stuff from an admitted cock sucker.

I see.
 

RedheadedStranger » 14 Mar 2023, 5:21 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2023, 5:21 pm

You asked a question and the unanimous answer you received from the "gun nutters" was that the parents should face serious charges for neglect in the death of the girl.

Then when I pointed out that your stats were **** and that you were mocking a dead kid in the process, you got pissed and started talking about killing me and burying me in your back yard.

At one point I even asked what it was YOU propose to keep this from happening again, and you dodged the question.

"Dialogue" was the last thing you were looking for when you started this thread you disingenuous piece of trash.

You may now **** off.

He's **** unhinged.

I think getting called out on a fake statistic his left wing masters gave him sent him over the edge. 

There'll be some tearful grooming tonight in maine. 
 

maineman » 14 Mar 2023, 5:25 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2023, 5:25 pm

which was my suggestion at my second  post.  

And that's it?  That's what the NRA thinks is a consensus solution to gun violence epidemic?  putting the parents of three year olds who shot their sisters in jail.

Your "suggestion" was the same as the "gun nutters" that answered your question.

Is that not a consensus?

I questioned your trolling and propaganda ****, and you threatened to bury me in your back yard.

Hopefully the authorities will act on my tip and come take your guns away... but seeing as how your connected to the DAs office by blood, I'm not holding my breath.

​​

RedheadedStranger » 14 Mar 2023, 5:39 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2023, 5:39 pm

1.  Your "suggestion" was the same as the "gun nutters" that answered your question.

Is that not a consensus?

2.  I questioned your trolling and propaganda ****, and you threatened to bury me in your back yard.

3.  Hopefully the authorities will act on my tip and come take your guns away... but seeing as how your[sic] connected to the DAs office by blood, I'm not holding my breath.

​​

1. consensus, certainly, but not a solution.

2. !  never threatened you for questioning me.  I told you what would happen if you came to Maine and got up in my grill.

3.  bring it on, tough guy.  
 
 
 

Cannonpointer » 14 Mar 2023, 5:32 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2023, 5:32 pm

What's YOUR "consensus solution," staunch 2nd Amendment supporter? 

If it were "MY" solution, it wouldn't be a consensus, moron.  Is English your second language, you admitted cock sucker?
 

maineman » 14 Mar 2023, 5:51 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2023, 5:51 pm

1. consensus, certainly, but not a solution.

2. !  never threatened you for questioning me.  I told you what would happen if you came to Maine and got up in my grill.

3.  bring it on, tough guy.

And when I asked you what YOUR solution was, you started bobbing and weaving.

Again I ask... what legislation would you propose to prevent a tragedy like this from happening again?

What new law would you enact?

Now dodge it again you disingenuous **** head.
 

maineman » 14 Mar 2023, 6:12 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2023, 6:12 pm

If it were "MY" solution, it wouldn't be a consensus, moron.  Is English your second language, you admitted cock sucker?

Keep trying.

Unless you propose one, you cannot get consensus - for which you clearly are not looking, anti-gun groomer. 
 
Are you ever going to own up to the false statistic you peddled, ignoramus?

maineman » 13 Mar 2023, 10:20 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Mar 2023, 10:20 pm

my OP merely asked what NRA members thought of the incident.  I never mentioned political affiliation, nor dd I suggest or even imply that everyone needed to hold a uniform view of the meaning of the 2nd amendment.

Then why did you ask:  "Are you suggesting that no one can have a different perspective on the absolute nature of the 2nd Amendment from NTA members?"
 

RedheadedStranger » 13 Mar 2023, 2:51 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Mar 2023, 2:51 pm

From your source...

Firearm-related injury recently surpassed motor vehicle crashes to become the leading cause of death among people 1 to 19 years old in the US, according to a 2022 paper published in The New England Journal of Medicine. In that, the US stands alone among world powers.

That age group includes 18 and 19 years olds, which not only aren't children, but are most likely gang bangers and other criminal elements in the urban jungles shooting each other.

Why do you lefties always have to be so damn disingenuous?

You have to forgive mainbitch, he NEVER reads his own links or bothers to question whether the information is is putting out, has any basis in reality.
 

golfboy » 14 Mar 2023, 6:35 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2023, 6:35 pm

Then why did you ask:  "Are you suggesting that no one can have a different perspective on the absolute nature of the 2nd Amendment from NTA members?"

because absolute and consensus are mutually exclusive.

Is English your second language or are your just so reading disabled that you can't understand that clear difference?