Liberal Forum

maineman » 14 Mar 2023, 7:01 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2023, 7:01 pm

because absolute and consensus are mutually exclusive.

Is English your second language or are your just so reading disabled that you can't understand that clear difference?

Who was comparing absolute and consensus?   *******?
You really have a hard time staying on topic, don't you?
 

Cannonpointer » 14 Mar 2023, 6:20 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2023, 6:20 pm

Keep trying.

Unless you propose one, you cannot get consensus - for which you clearly are not looking, anti-gun groomer. 
 
Are you ever going to own up to the false statistic you peddled, ignoramus?

I proposed opening a dialog.  There is no reason to sing an opening prelude if no one is listening.

Yeah...take the 19 year olds out of the data and ... ****... there ain't ANY kids killed by guns.  True.... NO kids...well, except for the four year old in the OP ... are killed by guns. Oddly enough, when you turn 19 in America...you're everybody's favorite target.  It's amazing...hardly any kids killed by guns in America until they turn 19...and then.... **** blood bath!    

golfboy » 14 Mar 2023, 7:05 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2023, 7:05 pm

Who was comparing absolute and consensus?   *******?
You really have a hard time staying on topic, don't you?

you were.  and you're too stupid to even understand that you were.

Just like you are too stupid to realize that. YES *******, FIFTY VOTES ARE ALL THAT IS NEEDED TO PASS A BILL IN THE SENATE WHEN ALL SENATORS ARE PRESENT AND VOTING"  is as **** wrong today as it was when ou said it.  You're stupid.  You're stubborn.  You're brain damaged.  Own it.

maineman » 14 Mar 2023, 7:06 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2023, 7:06 pm

I proposed opening a dialog.  There is no reason to sing an opening prelude if no one is listening.

Yeah...take the 19 year olds out of the data and ... ****... there ain't ANY kids killed by guns.  True.... NO kids...well, except for the four year old in the OP ... are killed by guns. Oddly enough, when you turn 19 in America...you're everybody's favorite target.  It's amazing...hardly any kids killed by guns in America until they turn 19...and then.... **** blood bath!  

So what ARE the numbers for 1-17 year olds?

Here's an interesting number, Metro vs Rural:
Metro: 37,391
Rural:  7,831
More proof that liberal hellholes are the problem. 
 

golfboy » 14 Mar 2023, 7:14 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2023, 7:14 pm

So what ARE the numbers for 1-17 year olds?

Here's an interesting number, Metro vs Rural:
Metro: 37,391
Rural:  7,831
More proof that liberal hellholes are the problem.

really?  more people live in cities than in the country?

wow.

you really ARE stupid, aren't you!        

maineman » 14 Mar 2023, 7:06 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2023, 7:06 pm

I proposed opening a dialog.  There is no reason to sing an opening prelude if no one is listening.

Yeah...take the 19 year olds out of the data and ... ****... there ain't ANY kids killed by guns.  True.... NO kids...well, except for the four year old in the OP ... are killed by guns. Oddly enough, when you turn 19 in America...you're everybody's favorite target.  It's amazing...hardly any kids killed by guns in America until they turn 19...and then.... **** blood bath!  

Take the 18 and 19 year olds out of the data, as well as intentional shootings (gang banging and criminal element), and the true number of kids killed by accidental shootings like the one in your OP, is considerably lower than the number you and your source cited.

This is why I said you were being deceitful, because you were.


 

maineman » 14 Mar 2023, 7:10 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2023, 7:10 pm

you were.  and you're too stupid to even understand that you were.

Just like you are too stupid to realize that. YES *******, FIFTY VOTES ARE ALL THAT IS NEEDED TO PASS A BILL IN THE SENATE WHEN ALL SENATORS ARE PRESENT AND VOTING"  is as **** wrong today as it was when ou said it.  You're stupid.  You're stubborn.  You're brain damaged.  Own it.

And once again, mainbitch is reduced to ad hominem attacks because he can't defend his ignorant positions.
 

maineman » 14 Mar 2023, 7:16 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2023, 7:16 pm

really?  more people live in cities than in the country?

wow.

you really ARE stupid, aren't you!      

Yea, it has nothing to do with crime rates and gangs in liberal hellholes. 
But it is amusing to see YOU calling other people stupid. 
 

RedheadedStranger » 14 Mar 2023, 7:17 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2023, 7:17 pm

Take the 18 and 19 year olds out of the data, as well as intentional shootings (gang banging and criminal element), and the true number of kids killed by accidental shootings like the one in your OP, is considerably lower than the number you and your source cited.

This is why I said you were being deceitful, because you were.

considerably lower.

now that is an objective measure if I ever heard one.

I bet you think your dick is considerably bigger than other guys.

wow.  


who gives a ****?

maineman » 14 Mar 2023, 7:19 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2023, 7:19 pm

considerably lower.

now that is an objective measure if I ever heard one.

I bet you think your dick is considerably bigger than other guys.

wow.  

who gives a ****?

shut the **** up

maineman » 14 Mar 2023, 7:06 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2023, 7:06 pm

I proposed opening a dialog.  There is no reason to sing an opening prelude if no one is listening.

But you DID sing - quite clearly. You used hashtags and dog whistles that were nothing less than a declaration of your intention to oppose guns.

Are you ever going to acknowledge that you cited a false statistic, and tell us whether that was dishonesty or merely gullability? When you get caught in a bald-faced lie, you have a **** duty. Are you new to posting on the internet, or just a typical lying leftist piece of ****?

maineman » 14 Mar 2023, 7:06 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2023, 7:06 pm

Yeah...take the 19 year olds out of the data

No, dishonest queer. Take the 18 AND 19year olds out of the equation - you had TWO false years: 18 to 19 and 19 to 20 - in your fake statistic.

maineman » 14 Mar 2023, 7:06 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2023, 7:06 pm

and ... ****... there ain't ANY kids killed by guns.

Oh, look - YOU'RE the victim. I'M the unreasonable guy for calling out your lie. Poor you, groomer.

When are YOU going to own you lie and stop asking ME to own it, you putrid little victim?

maineman » 14 Mar 2023, 7:06 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2023, 7:06 pm

True.... NO kids...well, except for the four year old in the OP

The one you CELEBRATED as a darwinian win for society, you piece of ****?

maineman » 14 Mar 2023, 7:06 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2023, 7:06 pm

... are killed by guns. Oddly enough, when you turn 19 in America...you're everybody's favorite target.

If you join a gang. Or the police force. Or the military.  

maineman » 14 Mar 2023, 7:06 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2023, 7:06 pm

It's amazing...hardly any kids killed by guns in America until they turn 19...and then.... **** blood bath!  

AGAIN, ***, quit whining that you were caught in that lie and man the **** up.

Were you lying, or were you lied-to and stupid. Which, groomer?
 

golfboy » 14 Mar 2023, 7:18 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2023, 7:18 pm

Yea, it has nothing to do with crime rates and gangs in liberal hellholes. 
But it is amusing to see YOU calling other people stupid.

your data shows that five times more kids died in urban areas than in rural areasUnited States 

• 3,573: Total number of 2010 Census urban areas in the United States
  • 486: Number of urbanized areas (UAs)
  • 3,087: Number of urban clusters (UCs)
• 249,253,271: Total urban population in the United States
  • 219,922,123: Urbanized area (UA) population
  • 29,331,148: Urban cluster (UC) population
• 59,492,276: Total rural population in the United States

• 80.7%: Percent of the U.S. population that is urban

 
 

maineman » 14 Mar 2023, 7:19 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2023, 7:19 pm

considerably lower.

now that is an objective measure if I ever heard one.

I bet you think your dick is considerably bigger than other guys.

wow.  

who gives a ****?

This is why nobody takes your **** seriously.

You get exposed posting ****, and your response is "who gives a ****".

And of course, you have to start talking about guys dicks too.

I'm not surprised there either.


 

POM » 14 Mar 2023, 7:20 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2023, 7:20 pm

shut the **** up

show me your YUGE e-muscles.

that'll scare me!          

maineman » 14 Mar 2023, 7:27 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2023, 7:27 pm

show me your YUGE e-muscles.

that'll scare me!        

aren’t you going to ask me to come to Maine?

POM » 14 Mar 2023, 7:31 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2023, 7:31 pm

aren’t you going to ask me to come to Maine?

PM me if you need his address.    
 

Majik » 13 Mar 2023, 2:20 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Mar 2023, 2:20 pm

Wrong.
a fire arm didn't kill that child.....
The parent's neglect... did.....
Period.
And that's the difference between your kind and my kind....
you will always blame the gun.....
What kind of military training did you get out of the NAVY..?...because I am starting to wonder how a guy that claims to be NAVY does not even show an inkling of the responsibility of an operator of a firearm. ...

And I wouldn't call a dunce who received an undesirable discharge 2 days into boot camp a "veteran."  He's a failure and cannot handle authority. Most liberals are that way.      
 

golfboy » 14 Mar 2023, 7:38 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2023, 7:38 pm

PM me if you need his address.  

that’s great! I would show up at @maineman s house and he would have a stroke and his wife would ask me to help dig a hole for him in the ground and I would and then we throw his fat body in the ground and I would piss on him and smile and then pile the dirt back on and laugh.  Don’t tell him but she wants to piss on him as well.

 
 

DeplorablePatriot » 14 Mar 2023, 7:39 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2023, 7:39 pm

And I wouldn't call a dunce who received an undesirable discharge 2 days into boot camp a "veteran."  He's a failure and cannot handle authority. Most liberals are that way.  

I agree 
 

That fat lazy **** @maineman  talks about his guns but he is a ****** because he won’t show a picture of them