razoo » 23 Mar 2023, 2:24 pm » wrote: ↑ Do some homework. As it is you are making **** up .................
There is ONE small detail that is worthy of note. SS bonds are not fungible on the open market - all of those others are. I believe it was Reagan who made that switch - before him, SS's bonds were the same as everyone else's.razoo » 23 Mar 2023, 2:24 pm » wrote: ↑ The trust fund is just a bunch of government IOUs and therefore worthless. Is this true? [/i]The trust fund does just contain IOUs, but they’re not worthless. If they are, someone should tell that to the very smart and very rich people, and the central banks of Japan, China, and many other countries that hold a large share of their assets in U.S. government bonds.
Post office needs to stop money laundring for elected representatives that decided to become leaders of reasonable doubt becoming legislated morality, legality, situational ethics for rank has the privileges the governed must sacrifice biological time to keep realities in fruition all 5 generations left evolving forward now..Cannonpointer » 23 Mar 2023, 3:25 pm » wrote: ↑ SOCIAL SECURITY ONLY HAS SIX MONTHS BEFORE IT IS INSOLVENT. THE POST OFFICE NEEDS TO BE GIVEN TO WALL STREET - WE SHOULD PAY THEM TO TAKE IT.
Link
You just yelled.Beekeeper » 23 Mar 2023, 3:06 pm » wrote: ↑ You use a THIRTEEN year old PROPAGANDA PIECE to ATTEMPT to justify your ****???
You got in line and took your vax like a good boy, did you not?Beekeeper » 23 Mar 2023, 3:06 pm » wrote: ↑ Trust me porkarse, you got NOTHING and never will since LWNJs like you LOVE you some GOVERNMENT and actually believe that you will be PAID IN FULL for your teat sucking.
I WOULD accuse you of using a "THIRTEEN year old PROPAGANDA PIECE to ATTEMPT to justify your ****," but you just yelled.Beekeeper » 23 Mar 2023, 3:06 pm » wrote: ↑ The REALITY IS, all those GOVERNMENT BONDS are being CASHED IN TODAY to pay FULL BENEFITS that have been put in place. Now, DENY THAT ONE or PROVE OTHERWISE!! THE SS TRUST FUND WILL BE GONE by 2033 or some year in the VERY near future.
AND WHAT DOES THAT MEAN, DORKFACE???? Oh that's right, BENEFITS GET CUT by 22% and YOU are NOT SUCKING AS MUCH TEAT!!
Or at sea level.Nostradamus'omh » 23 Mar 2023, 3:23 pm » wrote: ↑ Al Gore diversified where he keeps it to some in every house. Never put all your eggs in one basket.
Ever look at life from see level? Everyone has models speculating life exceeds mutually evolving here now. Living doesn't exceed being timed apart now conceived to decomposed and all you debate is relative time cradle to grave using semantics of 24/7.Cannonpointer » 23 Mar 2023, 3:39 pm » wrote: ↑ Or at sea level.
It's going up - any minute now. I have models. :rofl:
the next elections will be the most critical. changes to social security will happen. I will vote for the ones who will lift the cap on how much money can be taxed, that is the most fair, a lot more fairer than decreasing the amount of social security paid. and raising the retirement age is also not fair.Cannonpointer » 23 Mar 2023, 11:43 am » wrote: ↑ Not a Pence man, myself.
I think "cuts" to wall street and the MIC should precede cuts to SS and Medicare.
You?
Once corrupted ^^^^^^^^ will never go back to being honest again.jerra b » 24 Mar 2023, 12:08 pm » wrote: ↑ the next elections will be the most critical. changes to social security will happen. I will vote for the ones who will lift the cap on how much money can be taxed, that is the most fair, a lot more fairer than decreasing the amount of social security paid. and raising the retirement age is also not fair.
The fair is in september. I never miss it.jerrab » 24 Mar 2023, 12:08 pm » wrote: ↑ the next elections will be the most critical. changes to social security will happen. I will vote for the ones who will lift the cap on how much money can be taxed, that is the most fair, a lot more fairer than decreasing the amount of social security paid. and raising the retirement age is also not fair.