Has anyone figured out why this is coming about now? Doing away with all tyoes of communication except cyberspace? Print, theaters, radio, television, etc.Trumprules » 15 Mar 2023, 10:37 am » wrote: ↑ but it will be so much fun watching people sue the networks though.
When you, under the name "King of the County" spoke of buying two Trump hats and a Trump banner which you claimed you would fly from your Ram pickup truck.
a person named Candy is locked in that van.
don't you drive a Lesbaru?Xavier_Onassis » 16 Mar 2023, 8:50 am » wrote: ↑ When you, under the name "King of the County" spoke of buying two Trump hats and a Trump banner which you claimed you would fly from your Ram pickup truck.
So every news story that any element of which was possibly in dispute would result in a lawsuit?Cannonpointer » 15 Mar 2023, 4:14 pm » wrote: ↑ Not quite.
They'll be taking a chance, doing that. If they're wrong, they'll pay.
They are responsible for what THEY SAY, not for what another fellow says.
For example, calling Rittenhouse an alt right nazi - or lying that he transported a gun across state lines - or that he illegally possessed his firearm, or that zimmerman was white, or pretending that treyvon was 12 years old by publishing his sixth grade class photo instead of his 17 year old, six foot corpse - all of these would have resulted in big money losses under the law you and I support.
The problem with that law is that most media companies already admit in their disclaimers that they are not responsible for the opinions aired on their platforms thus giving them blanket immunity from prosecution .....in most cases.Trumprules » 15 Mar 2023, 12:10 am » wrote: ↑ Now the media will be held responsible for defamation. You got to tell your viewers this isn't news this is just my opinion. Opening up reporters from pushing fake news and letting their viewers not know its opinion and not fact.
I'm glad Florida is passing this law and applaud it. Now opinion based reporting needs to tell you if it is opinion or fact. Bravo.
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/new-florid ... -rcna71957
Just the ones where the press is trying to get cities burning and cops killed, groomer.Xavier_Onassis » 16 Mar 2023, 8:57 am » wrote: ↑ So every news story that any element of which was possibly in dispute would result in a lawsuit?
By his identity, ***. He identified as a afro-peruvian, spoke perfect Spanish, associated with mostly black folks and brown folks.Xavier_Onassis » 16 Mar 2023, 8:57 am » wrote: ↑ By what criteria would you prove that Zimmerman was not White? Would there have to be a DNA test?
Ask zimmerman. His great grandmother was black. That makes him an octoroon all day long in my klavern.Xavier_Onassis » 16 Mar 2023, 8:57 am » wrote: ↑ How much non-European DNA would i need to show to prove that Zimmerman was a "person of color"?
You think anyone will listen?Xavier_Onassis » 16 Mar 2023, 8:57 am » wrote: ↑ Do you propose that the "one drop rule" be ruled to be a legal standard?
I'd quickly establish myself as "one of the good ones."Xavier_Onassis » 16 Mar 2023, 8:57 am » wrote: ↑ Be careful of what you wish for. You might end up being known as "Little Black Cannonpointer".![]()
![]()
![]()
I'll give you a few examples that hit close to home, since you are a committed child groomer.Xavier_Onassis » 16 Mar 2023, 8:57 am » wrote: ↑ So every news story that any element of which was possibly in dispute would result in a lawsuit?