If that actually happened at one of these drag-time readings, I would agree with you. But these Drag-time readings have proven pretty tame by anyone who actually sat through one.DeezerShoove » 10 Apr 2023, 8:04 am » wrote: ↑ I don't doubt that at all.
"Harmless" is subjective as hell and I don't agree with it coming from the people with a mindset that allows them to publicly explode when called by 'he' or 'she'.
Slapping out an exhibitionist's banana hammock in front of prepubescent girls is not harmless.
At the very least it is just hypocritical.
Why not have a non-drag queen read those stories. What's the purpose of the drag queen in those situations?ScottMon » 10 Apr 2023, 12:29 am » wrote: ↑ No. The drag time readings are harmless. DeSantis sent someone to investigate and came back with nothiong.
The worst thing? Bottles would have made a mess.DeezerShoove » 09 Apr 2023, 9:18 pm » wrote: ↑ You probably got it bent over the pinball machine.
Now every time you walk past an arcade you'll want to "snuff it"
Just like Little Alex listening to Beethoven.
For me it's the scanner beep at the grocery store.
A bag boy had his way with me in the wine section long ago. I'm wine section hot.
Gotta say - that *** has reasonable facility with screen names. Black veggie and 5th horseman are both decent references.Jantje_Smit » 10 Apr 2023, 5:21 am » wrote: ↑ You would love it...hooey claimed his meltdown is over but he lied, it's still going on, he has some serious issues.. lol.. just for fun.. oh, the5thhorseman is BV..
I've seen drag queen **** before.ScottMon » 10 Apr 2023, 8:23 am » wrote: ↑ If that actually happened at one of these drag-time readings, I would agree with you. But these Drag-time readings have proven pretty tame by anyone who actually sat through one.
Yeah, and the boxes were not stacked high...Cannonpointer » 10 Apr 2023, 8:47 am » wrote: ↑ The worst thing? Bottles would have made a mess.
You were bent of wine boxes.
There is so much shame in that. If you were Jap, you'd have to hari kari.
They disrespected you, my friend. There was no affection in what they did.DeezerShoove » 10 Apr 2023, 4:08 pm » wrote: ↑ Yeah, and the boxes were not stacked high...
I was so bent over.
And the beeping. Customer after customer.
Well, I plead the 5th then.
ScottMon » 09 Apr 2023, 9:59 pm » wrote: ↑ BV discovered how far you guys will go to play the blame game instead of solving the problems we face. Children are learning how to avoid active shooters and they are learning that the older generations are too lodged in their own games to keep them safe. They don't want you to protest drag time reading hours, They want to know they won't be killed by some shooter. All you do is blame and excuse. You protect your own feelings from any sense of personal responsiblity.
So, if cis men wanted to cavort with each other hyper-sexually around children, that wouldn't be a problem, either - right, pedo?ScottMon » 10 Apr 2023, 12:29 am » wrote: ↑ No. The drag time readings are harmless. DeSantis sent someone to investigate and came back with nothiong.
You have never sat through one of these readings. Your moral outrage is without proof.Cannonpointer » 13 Apr 2023, 8:08 pm » wrote: ↑ So, if cis men wanted to cavort with each other hyper-sexually around children, that wouldn't be a problem, either - right, pedo?
A gal once said that I acted very offensive during sex. Will that qualify?Cannonpointer » 31 Mar 2023, 10:17 pm » wrote: ↑ I TRIED to register as a sex offender and they wouldn't let me - said I had to commit a sex crime first.
I had two ex-wives provide affidavits regarding my incompetence in the bedroom, but that wasn't good enough.
I wanted to infiltrate the groomersphere - fit these cocksuckers for mill stones.
I even showed the photos of some of the nasty hogs I've bedded - no dice. Need a conviction.
OOOOO Not good. we girls gossip.DeplorablePatriot » 14 Apr 2023, 4:07 pm » wrote: ↑ A gal once said that I acted very offensive during sex. Will that qualify?
You should plead INSANITY! It worked before for you!
They'll lie, but the truth is, if you don't offend them, you're not doing it right.DeplorablePatriot » 14 Apr 2023, 4:07 pm » wrote: ↑ A gal once said that I acted very offensive during sex. Will that qualify?
So, if cis men wanted to cavort with each other hyper-sexually around children, that wouldn't be a problem, either - right, pedo?ScottMon » 14 Apr 2023, 7:42 am » wrote: ↑ You have never sat through one of these readings. Your moral outrage is without proof.
You guys are the only ones I see bringing up sexuality in this argument. You have NEVER attended one of these readings.Cannonpointer » 15 Apr 2023, 12:09 am » wrote: ↑ So, if cis men wanted to cavort with each other hyper-sexually around children, that wouldn't be a problem, either - right, pedo?
Why are the men in dresses and eye make up?ScottMon » 15 Apr 2023, 7:36 pm » wrote: ↑ You guys are the only ones I see bringing up sexuality in this argument. You have NEVER attended one of these readings.
So, if cis men wanted to cavort with each other hyper-sexually around children, that wouldn't be a problem, either - right, pedo?ScottMon » 15 Apr 2023, 7:36 pm » wrote: ↑ You guys are the only ones I see bringing up sexuality in this argument. You have NEVER attended one of these readings.
As I posted on another thread....ScottMon » 15 Apr 2023, 7:36 pm » wrote: ↑ You guys are the only ones I see bringing up sexuality in this argument. You have NEVER attended one of these readings.