Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
Stormy Daniels and the Statute of Limitation
Stormy Daniels and the Statute of Limitation
By roadkill
18 Mar 2023 9:09 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
20 Mar 2023 4:44 pm
so you really CAN'T read?
20 Mar 2023 4:47 pm
@FJB is too ignorant to be able to read this post.maineman » 20 Mar 2023, 4:31 pm » wrote: ↑ @FJB
S 175.10 Falsifying business records in the first degree.
A person is guilty of falsifying business records in the first degree
when he commits the crime of falsifying business records in the second
degree, and when his intent to defraud includes an intent to commit
another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof.
Falsifying business records in the first degree is a class E felony.
18 U.S. Code § 793 - Gathering, transmitting or losing defense information
(a) Whoever, for the purpose of obtaining information respecting the national defense with intent or reason to believe that the information is to be used to the injury of the United States, or to the advantage of any foreign nation, goes upon, enters, flies over, or otherwise obtains information concerning any vessel, aircraft, work of defense, navy yard, naval station, submarine base, fueling station, fort, battery, torpedo station, dockyard, canal, railroad, arsenal, camp, factory, mine, telegraph, telephone, wireless, or signal station, building, office, research laboratory or station or other place connected with the national defense owned or constructed, or in progress of construction by the United States or under the control of the United States, or of any of its officers, departments, or agencies, or within the exclusive jurisdiction of the United States, or any place in which any vessel, aircraft, arms, munitions, or other materials or instruments for use in time of war are being made, prepared, repaired, stored, or are the subject of research or development, under any contract or agreement with the United States, or any department or agency thereof, or with any person on behalf of the United States, or otherwise on behalf of the United States, or any prohibited place so designated by the President by proclamation in time of war or in case of national emergency in which anything for the use of the Army, Navy, or Air Force is being prepared or constructed or stored, information as to which prohibited place the President has determined would be prejudicial to the national defense.
those are TWO of the several statutes the DA's are considering changing the clown with violating.
Is anyone surprised?
20 Mar 2023 4:57 pm
20 Mar 2023 5:01 pm
20 Mar 2023 5:04 pm
20 Mar 2023 5:05 pm
That is not what the fat **** Manhatten da is charging him with. Tell your skank to stop sucking dick and learn the law.maineman » 20 Mar 2023, 4:47 pm » wrote: ↑ @FJB is too ignorant to be able to read this post.
Is anyone surprised?
20 Mar 2023 5:05 pm
FJB » 20 Mar 2023, 5:05 pm » wrote: ↑ That is not what the fat **** Manhatten da is charging him with. Tell your skank to stop sucking dick and learn the law.
mainedump is clueless.
20 Mar 2023 5:27 pm
20 Mar 2023 5:40 pm
20 Mar 2023 6:06 pm
the first one IS what he will probably be charged with in NY... the second one is what Jack Smith will prosecute him for.FJB » 20 Mar 2023, 5:05 pm » wrote: ↑ That is not what the fat **** Manhatten da is charging him with. Tell your skank to stop sucking dick and learn the law.
Again... tell us all where YOU studied law, Mr. Perry Mason wannabe?
20 Mar 2023 6:09 pm
The fed already looked at charging trump with that. This fat **** is trying to score political points. He will regret it. Seems you and your cocksucking skank have no clue.maineman » 20 Mar 2023, 6:06 pm » wrote: ↑ the first one IS what he will probably be charged with in NY... the second one is what Jack Smith will prosecute him for.
Again... tell us all where YOU studied law, Mr. Perry Mason wannabe?
20 Mar 2023 6:09 pm
20 Mar 2023 6:10 pm
your skank is **** two ton tessy
20 Mar 2023 6:11 pm
Yer a public nuisance.
20 Mar 2023 6:11 pm
Jack Smith has not even finished his investigation. Seems like you don't know **** about the law... but you certainly know a lot about sucking cock.FJB » 20 Mar 2023, 6:09 pm » wrote: ↑ The fed already looked at charging trump with that. This fat **** is trying to score political points. He will regret it. Seems you and your cocksucking skank have no clue.
20 Mar 2023 6:12 pm
Yes your skank does know about sucking dick.maineman » 20 Mar 2023, 6:11 pm » wrote: ↑ Jack Smith has not even finished his investigation. Seems like you don't know **** about the law... but you certainly know a lot about sucking cock.
20 Mar 2023 6:12 pm
maineman » 20 Mar 2023, 6:11 pm » wrote: ↑ Jack Smith has not even finished his investigation. Seems like you don't know **** about the law... but you certainly know a lot about sucking cock.
He's not yer wife.
20 Mar 2023 6:12 pm
and you are a disgrace to American patriotism.
20 Mar 2023 6:13 pm
No...I'm yer daddy.
20 Mar 2023 6:15 pm
but that doesn't change the fact that he has repeatedly admitted to sucking a gay lawyer's cock on the beach in Ogunquit... he even said he drove all the way to Maine from North Caroline for his first taste of dick. FACT.
And I am amazed... your wife won't suck YOUR dick? That's sad.
Who is online
In total there are 3255 users online :: 5 registered, 20 bots, and 3230 guests
Bots: Mediatoolkitbot, TTD-Content, CriteoBot, Yahoo! Slurp, Firefox/7.0, ADmantX, DuckDuckBot, okhttp, Not, NING, proximic, sqlmap, YandexBot, Googlebot, Baiduspider, Applebot, facebookexternalhit, bingbot, Mediapartners-Google, curl/7