Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
Stormy Daniels and the Statute of Limitation
Stormy Daniels and the Statute of Limitation
By roadkill
18 Mar 2023 9:09 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
22 Mar 2023 2:15 pm
sez the cuckold....lol
classic.
And ya know what? I have absolutely no doubt that your wife is getting serviced by SOME other guy, but any woman who would marry a moron like you is nobody I'd be interested in. I wouldn't **** her with CP's dick.
22 Mar 2023 3:04 pm
if you support what’s been going on the last 2 years your commitment to stupidity is impressivemaineman » 22 Mar 2023, 11:49 am » wrote: ↑ Of course I still support Biden. I am a lifelong democrat. My father was a democratic legislator in Illinois right after he came back from WWII. I come from a long line of democrats. I support the issues that are the planks in the democratic platform. I would imagine that you support the issues that are the planks of the republican platform... when they still had one, that is.
On hand, I KNOW what my party's platform says. I have read both party's platforms every presidential election year since 1972. Every. Single. ****. Year.
Until 2020, that is, when the GOP, for the first time in my lifetime, failed to issue a platform and went with "Whatever the clown wants is what we want".
How about you, @deadskunk? Have you EVER read a party platform in your miserable life?
I support universal health care, a stronger social safety net, a woman's right to reproductive freedom, sensible gun control, combating climate change, a strong military and the maintenance of our global alliances. Biden supports all of those things. The democratic party supports all of those things.
YOU DON'T. Your party doesn't.
If someone believes in the things that I believe in, there really is only one choice as to which party and which candidate to support.
And I missed you thanking me for my service, or do you only do that to REPUBLICAN veterans, cuckold?
now go **** off.
22 Mar 2023 3:59 pm
I'm pounding yer wife...that's why we turned the stereo up.maineman » 22 Mar 2023, 2:15 pm » wrote: ↑ sez the cuckold....lol
classic.
And ya know what? I have absolutely no doubt that your wife is getting serviced by SOME other guy, but any woman who would marry a moron like you is nobody I'd be interested in. I wouldn't **** her with CP's dick.
22 Mar 2023 4:01 pm
Odd...she's sitting right here next to me.roadkill » 22 Mar 2023, 3:59 pm » wrote: ↑ I'm pounding yer wife...that's why we turned the stereo up.
cuckold.
22 Mar 2023 4:03 pm
If you supported what happened on January 6th, you should be shot.BuckNaked » 22 Mar 2023, 3:04 pm » wrote: ↑ if you support what’s been going on the last 2 years your commitment to stupidity is impressive
22 Mar 2023 4:05 pm
i didnt.maineman » 22 Mar 2023, 4:03 pm » wrote: ↑ If you supported what happened on January 6th, you should be shot.
22 Mar 2023 4:06 pm
so you never bought into the "stop the steal" mantra?
22 Mar 2023 5:02 pm
Yeah now...lol
22 Mar 2023 5:26 pm
we haven't been out of each other's sight for more than a week, idiot. And my wife would laugh you out of the bedroom.... like your own wife does.
cuckold!
22 Mar 2023 5:30 pm
I denied it? Link?
22 Mar 2023 5:31 pm
The rule changes WERE partisan, and they were illegal.maineman » 21 Mar 2023, 10:05 pm » wrote: ↑ The rules changes were not partisan. My party just figured out how to maximize their GOTV effort using the new rules.
See what I mean about you being willfully blind, ignorant, stubborn AND stupid?
*******.
You approve because you gained power.
22 Mar 2023 5:33 pm
partisan? the rules specified different treatment for different parties? Link???golfboy » 22 Mar 2023, 5:31 pm » wrote: ↑ The rule changes WERE partisan, and they were illegal.
*******.
You approve because you gained power.
And they were deemed to be illegal, but the election was not.
22 Mar 2023 5:34 pm
So you don't deny it?
Keep tap dancing, retard.
22 Mar 2023 5:35 pm
You said I denied it. You lied.
Oh wait, you said you don't lie. But that too, was a lie, wasn't it?
You'll always be my bitch.
22 Mar 2023 5:36 pm
The rules were only advanced by Democrats, in coordination was Democrat activists who were staged to harvest those ballots.maineman » 22 Mar 2023, 5:33 pm » wrote: ↑ partisan? the rules specified different treatment for different parties? Link???
And they were deemed to be illegal, but the election was not.
Like I said, you don't give a **** about this country. All you care about is political power.
22 Mar 2023 5:36 pm
lolgolfboy » 22 Mar 2023, 5:35 pm » wrote: ↑ You said I denied it. You lied.
Oh wait, you said you don't lie. But that too, was a lie, wasn't it?
You'll always be my bitch.
poor little retarded golf boy.
sad
22 Mar 2023 5:38 pm
Game.
Set.
Match.
You lose again.
22 Mar 2023 5:38 pm
were the rules partisan in any way? Y/N?golfboy » 22 Mar 2023, 5:36 pm » wrote: ↑ The rules were only advanced by Democrats, in coordination was Democrat activists who were staged to harvest those ballots.
Like I said, you don't give a **** about this country. All you care about is political power.
Did their wording give any preference to either party? Y/N?
quit tapdancing.
22 Mar 2023 5:39 pm
Yes, it benefitted Democrats, for the reasons I already gave you.maineman » 22 Mar 2023, 5:38 pm » wrote: ↑ were the rules partisan in any way? Y/N?
Did their wording give any preference to either party? Y/N?
quit tapdancing.
You should read sometime.
*******.
22 Mar 2023 5:42 pm
maineman » 22 Mar 2023, 5:26 pm » wrote: ↑ we haven't been out of each other's sight for more than a week, idiot. And my wife would laugh you out of the bedroom.... like your own wife does.
cuckold!
I'm glad she calmed you down. It only took 5 minutes.
Who is online
In total there are 4965 users online :: 4 registered, 14 bots, and 4947 guests
Bots: Reeder, ADmantX, CriteoBot, facebookexternalhit, proximic, okhttp, YandexBot, Googlebot, Mediapartners-Google, DuckDuckBot, curl/7, Baiduspider, Applebot, bingbot