BuckNaked » 22 Mar 2023, 12:26 pm » wrote: ↑ did you run into feisty redhead rosselle il? Or tarheel or chicky?
Tell me more about peepee
you don’t think there is law enforcement monitoring the internet?Vegas » 22 Mar 2023, 12:21 pm » wrote: ↑ Go ahead. Ask @Cannonpointer to put it on my profile and see how pissed I get.
Also, this is an anonymous forum. Nobody knows who the hell you are.
Crying for child disturbers, ya cheap little bitch?peepee » 22 Mar 2023, 11:42 am » wrote: ↑![]()
![]()
...certainly even a gd fool [and monetary ignoramus] such as yourself understands that if 'orange-mouthed puppet trump cacksucker and child-buggerer [and monetary ignoramus]' appeared under your avatar, you'd be less likely to post....can you admit that, you dense @sshole? [and monetary ignoramus]
start your own thread.
heis hoping to access your children.
nothing to start a thread on my mind
You want interaction because you crave hot man-on-man.Pastafarian » 22 Mar 2023, 11:55 am » wrote: ↑ So you can come take care of business.
I mean, y’all can bully just fine on an anonymous forum. I’m giving y’all the chance to come and bully me in person.
...drop in the bucket... 'republican-radio-incorporated' had been smearing puppet$ hillary/bill/etc. democrats for decades... 15 hours per week for 30 yearsMrkelly » 22 Mar 2023, 12:20 pm » wrote: ↑ Hillary tried that the first time around, she spent money going after his opponents …
sure there is, "Tell me more about peepee"
I’ve never dishonestly advertised with your avatar. That is playing dirty.
You, ******, have no kids.Cannonpointer » 22 Mar 2023, 12:31 pm » wrote: ↑ You want interaction because you crave hot man-on-man.
Likely you're also after access to other posters' children.
for 100 greenies, you can advertise with my avatar. Go aheadPastafarian » 22 Mar 2023, 12:31 pm » wrote: ↑ I’ve never dishonestly advertised with your avatar. That is playing dirty.
It was you who had Cannon place that logo as my avatar.
You can **** off now.
Is that what your next thread is going to be about?
@Cannonpointer lulls you into a false sense of security. Then he pounces.
Mrkelly » 22 Mar 2023, 12:35 pm » wrote: ↑ Is that what your next thread is going to be about?
you are the one talking about him in this hollowed thread
Cannonpointer » 22 Mar 2023, 12:28 pm » wrote: ↑ Crying for child disturbers, ya cheap little bitch?
How sad for you.
Heck no. I wouldn't have an account at a place like that. Too many crybabies, and the first time I would converse with one of them, I'd stab 'em in the gut 40 times and then pass the shiv to a friend, if I could find one. The short happy life of Skans on DU.ROG62 » 22 Mar 2023, 11:51 am » wrote: ↑ did you run into calvin there? that was his main source for posting **** on LFO...
sweet post man, this one really got some traction!Vegas » 22 Mar 2023, 10:08 am » wrote: ↑ And they were gay. Some showed about 90 members online, but their conversations were boring as hell. Not informative, not even creative insults. They insulted, but they were lame ones. I mean, if you are going to insult, then fine. But at least make them original, creative, and funny. Though it showed a lot of members, only a handful posted anything. What they posted was uninteresting.
This was the case for most of them. I like it here better.